Scientific Revolution: Boyle Vs. Isaac Newton

971 Words2 Pages

Although both Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton both were founders of the Scientific Revolution and modern Science Newton was better known for his work than Boyle in the general public. They both accomplished a lot but Newton’s work was better known and used by many. For more than a few reasons Newson’s work is better known in the public than that of Boyle.
Robert Boyle studied modern chemistry and investigated air pressure. He made two important contributions to science especially medicine and gravitation. He was noted for his work on behalf of experimentation. “Boyle’s experimental approach to chemistry helped to bring it into the realm of modern scholarship” (Bowles, Kaplan, 2012). “Alchemy, a mystical or mysterious element that was associated with chemistry, was almost the only chemical investigation done until Boyle’s days” (Sweeney, 2014).Deceptive allegations, bizarre beliefs and absolute deception made medieval science a disgraceful means of research. “By substituting quasi-scientific work with the experimental method, Boyle did a great service for future generations of chemical researchers” (Sweeney, 2014).He did not make any particular discoveries that persist …show more content…

“He proved that the force of attraction between two bodies of constant mass varies as the inverse of the square of the distance between those bodies (that is, FA = k/D2, where FA is the force of attraction between the bodies, D is the distance between them, and k is a constant) “(Hibbin, 2014). “From this beginning, he was able to explain why planets travel in ellipses around the Sun, why Earth’s tides move as they do, and why tennis balls, for example, follow the trajectories that they do. The inverse square formula also led Newton toward a notion of gravity that neatly tied his mathematics together” (Hibbin,

Open Document