Police leadership is important because it organizes and makes police organizations successful. Leadership is functional in all types occupation. In addition, every jobs or organization or more than two people will always need some sort of leadership. Also, there are few negative leadership and positive police leadership which will be covered in this critical analysis. Most of all this writing is prove the importance of police leadership.
Police leadership like every other leadership requires ample of responsibility, but the difference between a police leadership and other leadership is police leadership responsibility for police members, civilians, and complete of task: whereas normal leadership is only responsible for complete of task,
…show more content…
Also, (Johnson, 2016) stated “the police chief said the biggest leadership problem is prevalent at mid-level ranks such as: assistant inspector of police, inspector of police, assistant superintendent of police and superintendent of police”. (2010. Para,3) people can argue this as not an accurate statement because once a bad leader will always be a bad leadership no matter the rank of the leadership. However, leadership is supposed to be influential and role model to the lower ranked officer, because every officer will always aim get a higher rank rather be at the same position. However, police leadership is not always the most honest or accurate as (Justice, 2004) said “influence of officers’ and supervisors’ attitudes and priorities toward community policing and problem solving over the time officers spend conducting problem-solving activities. Analyzing data collected for the Project on Policing Neighborhoods, a multi-method study of police patrol in two police departments, results show that officers’ perceptions of their supervisors’ priorities for problem solving affect the amount of time they spend conducting these activities, although their own attitudes toward community policing are unrelated to their behavior. We also find that officers’ attitudes regarding problem solving are weakly correlated with their supervisors’ attitudes and, further, that officers’ perceptions of their …show more content…
On their duty, regardless the rank of the officer or the situation they most lead, because they deal with vulnerable people most of the time. Mostly every organization is deemed to lead. (Willis, 2010) suggested the analogy “. Like a lot of people i thought leadership was about rank, title, and position in an organization. I thought that the leaders of the organization were the Sergeant, Inspectors, Lieutenants, Captains, Superintendents and Chiefs. Over the years, I learned many valuable lessons about leadership. I learned that leadership is not about rank, position or title. Leadership is about action and interaction. Leadership is about doing what’s right, not what’s popular. Leadership is about doing what’s right, not what’s expedient. Perhaps most the most important lesson I’ve learned over the years is that everyone in an organization is able to lead.” (2010. Para,1). Affirmatively a true statement by (Willis,
Part 1, The Basics of Leadership, Chapter 1 covers Fundamentals of Leadership while Roles and Relationships are covered in Chapter 2. This section describes and depicts levels of Leadership. We as a military are set apart from other non-military professions in that Soldiers must be prepared to use deadly force and have the courage required to close with and destroy the enemy. All leaders, from non-commissioned officers and warrant officers, to commissioned officers, inherently possess a great responsibility. The repercussions of decisions and actions impact the lives of Soldiers and their families. Additionally, these decisions affect the battlefield environment including enemy and non-combatants, both military and
“Leadership is a process in which many can engage, not a position that only a few can hold.
Leadership can come in many forms and from many perspectives. In the heat of combat, the leadership from a Navy Seal is much different than that of a leader in a high school dorm. Through reading Extreme Ownership I found how leadership completely changes depending on the perspective. Leadership in combat is completely dependent on quick, decisive execution, whereas leadership in the dorm is more dependent on taking time to work with everyone before arriving at a solution.
Introduction According to the Oxford Dictionary, a leader is defined as “the person who leads or commands a group, organization, or country” (Oxford Dictionaries, 2013). Though there is a definition for what a leader is, people still have different ideas about what a leader should be and how he or she should act. There has never been a concrete idea of what a leader is; the only thing we know is that this person is the one in charge of the unit. We look at characteristics of those people we see as leaders and use those attributes to compare other people to see if they are able to be as good as, or even better than, those aforementioned leaders. We have to keep in mind that in different situations, leaders must do different tasks which indicates the need for different qualities.
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
M.D. Arnold once said, “A good leader leads the people from above them. A great leader leads the people from within them.” Reading this quote always reminds me of my decision to go into the Human Resource Management and Development field. It reminds me of what being in a leadership role is all about and how the wrong kind of leadership influence can potentially break or corrupt an organization. Ever since I can remember, I have always been the friend who others felt comfortable enough to speak to about their issues. I have always been the student who tries to find different methods to learn. I have always been the employee who makes sure my peers feel comfortable with the work given to them. I have always been a leader.
“In order to be a good leader, there are two things to remember. Lead from the Front and always set the Example. From these two leadership principles, everything else will fall into place.”
Wuestewald, T. (2013). Police Chief Magazine. The Changing Face of Police Leadership. Retrieved from http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_arch&article_id=859&issue_id=42006
It is necessary for different ranking levels to resolve issues. For example, the “Chief” of an organization does not always have time to answer all of the little questions or deal with every issue. When there is a chain of command, the lower level employees can utilize the chain of command to help resolve issues in a timely manner. Without this structure, employees would “flood” the “chief” with all of the issues, and the supervisors will be kept out of the loop of what’s going on. Nevertheless, I believe the paramilitary structure will work in policing for the reasons, information flows up the chain of command from the street officer to the police administration and orders and commands flow down the chain to the street officer. The chain of command and the paramilitary structure have been retained, regardless to the complexity of the police bureaucracy. Therefore, no matter how defined the hierarchy is or how flat the structure is, the goal was to be more consistent with community-oriented policing (Travis,
It is important that leaders can control and influence its subordinates or employees. For leaders achieve that they need to be knowledgeable, have good accreditation and as well as excellent reputation. This helps the leaders to be well respected by its employees. Since the criminal justice system operates in a chain of command, it is essential to possess all these qualities. Intellectual qualities enable leaders to attain respect from their subordinates, however, reducing the possibility of conflicts between the leader and his subordinate staff members. Therefore, officers need to be included in the leadership training to have such qualities. They include having knowledge of criminal justice, should be diverse with the ability for continuous learning, be computer literate and with knowledge of technology, fluent communicator, both verbally and in writing, and finally, the leader should be physically fit to sustain the strict justice
The Webster Dictionary defines leadership as an office or position, the capacity to lead, the act or an instance of leading (Merriam-Webster, 2011). Leader is defined as; a person who directs a military force or unit, a person who has commanding authority or influence (Merriam-Webster, 2011). The Army defines leadership as the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improving the organization. (Department of the Army, 2006 pg 1-2)
Leaders can have a powerful impact on the futures of many, and the way in which one approaches leadership is paramount to the type of impact one will have. Continual growth in the areas of knowledge I have and seek to acquire, as well as recognizing my leadership style and utilizing my personal strengths to the fullest, is vital to the successful implementation of my personal philosophy of leadership.
When some think of leadership the idea of the military is taken into account while others use the term to refer to executive management. These are few examples of different types of leaders there are. There are also different roles of leadership such as senior-level executives and middle managers. Motivated leaders who have charisma and high levels of emotional stability will be honest and have integrity in the manner in which they lead. An effective leader must be respected by the members of his or her group in order to perform effectively.
Many people associate leadership with a specific job title or form of power within an organization. However, through personal experience, I have concluded that leadership can come in many forms and position as well as from multiple sources of roles and job titles both with and without power. Based on the definition of leadership, anyone can be considered a leader as long as they have the ability to influence people to achieve a particular result or goal which benefits the organization or group as a whole. Individuals with a secure sense of self and understanding, acceptance of diversity within an organization tend to be the strongest leaders that not only make others want to follow, but they also encourage other leaders to gravitate to their
As the police look at leaders for help in coming together on a plan to implement in a way to resolve issues (Ortmeier, 2006). As with leaders and other community persons being involved with the aspect of improving the community, shows criminals that crime in the neighborhood is not going to be. As with this also, in teaching others, it can limit the role of the officer (Ortmeier, 2006). Although the police is still a function in the community, they can put efforts to other problems elsewhere. It allows the community to share responsibilities in the crime-reduction and problem solving (National Crime Prevention Council, 2008).