Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of religions in a political society
The role of religion in society and politics
The role of religion in society and politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of religions in a political society
Relationships are fleeting. They can be destroyed over the most fickle of things: slight differences of opinions, influence of other friends, arguments over the most ridiculous of things. But they can also be created as quickly as they can be dissolved. Two people may meet each other and instantly become best friends, leaving their other friends behind to scramble to find someone new to incessantly gossip and complain and bicker with. Once the people an individual used to associate with have moved on and one is left with only the person he/she deemed more worthy of attention than old friends, that person is apt to discover certain, unsavory, unbearable habits in the “friend” all of one’s trust bestowed in. Yet a person would rather continue to suffer with an individual one has grown to despise that be tossed back into the churning pot of society, supplied with a ceaseless supply of faces, opting for a negative relationship as opposed to discovering someone that genuinely compliments one’s own personality, enhances one’s sharpness of mind, clarifies one’s destined path. For as imperfect, naïve, self-deprecating humans, forever concerned with the perception of others, “we are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of the siren till she transforms us into beasts” (Henry). All of humanity would prefer to sit idly by and watch as the world slowly cracked and crumbled to pieces around them instead of holding their ground, defending their individual rights, standing up to despotism of tyranny. Governments are inclined to engulf as much power as possible, as much autonomy as their subjects are willing to hand over to them. The state will dominate every aspect of a person’s life--occupation, religion, life de...
... middle of paper ...
...y cretinous; to them their spiritual beliefs are irrevocably superior, the rest of the world’s, merely savage, those who adhere to them in desperate, immediate need of “saving.” And as people continue to “pronounce those blessed who most nearly resemble the gods” (Aristotle), religion will inevitably and endlessly be a pawn in the hands of tyrants. Therefore, by authorizing religion and the fabricated stories of creation, falsified accounts of woman’s inferiority to man, and fictitious assertions that suffering is better than challenging tyranny that accompany it to dictate life choices, people will never truly be free, regardless of their government’s actions. But if humankind is naturally inclined to follow the laws of government and the apparent guidance of religion, how can humanity ensure that spiritual and intellectual individuality will ever be fully achieved?
Thomas Paine begins his article by first exploring the differences between society and government. He explains that, “society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil.” (Frohnen 179) What he means by this is that to have society and community is a privilege, because we as humans are designed to have a need for human interaction, while government on the other hand is only a necessary evil, simply because we as humans are also designed to be inherently evil, and therefore government is a necessary evil to have in order to monitor wrongdoing, or to keep us from our own vices in other words. This emphasizes the Classical Christian Anthropological principle of duality, which is the inner struggle that we as humans have between amor sui, the love of self, and amor dei, the love of God. This struggle springs from the fact that evil is found within man, and we must mak...
Titus Lucretius Carus was a roman poet and a philosopher. He was born in 99B.C. and died 55B.C. As a philosopher he was very well known for his work on Epicureanism, or as we refer to it today, The Nature of Things. After reading his work, I believe that the source of religious belief is born within the fundamental nature of man and religious teaching embodies a deep concern shared by philosophy, for us as humans to possess knowledge of our world as a whole. No politics or laws will keep man from believing what they want, and we will always have a longing for political rule or higher power. The breakdown of society is far worse than society itself.
“To understand political power right, and derive it from its original, we must consider, what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom…” (2.8).
People have their own perspective of a government that they envision for their people. Thomas Jefferson has been the president of the United States and ruled under a monarch. Jefferson couldn’t tolerate the abuse from a monarch, so he rebelled against the British crown. In 1776, Thomas Jefferson wrote The Declaration of Independence, and declared the colonies were free from British rule. Before he became the author of The Declaration of Independence, Jefferson was established “ as an ardent republican and revolutionary” (Jacobus 77). Jacobus states Jefferson is, “one of the most versatile Americans of any generation” (Jacobus 78). In The Declaration of Independence, Jefferson and the founding fathers envisioned a government that would govern the people, and the people would be free. The people must be governed with rights, Jefferson implies it’s the government’s duty to guide and secure the people, therefore, he believes the government’s obligation to the individual is more important than the individuals obligation to the state.
Slezak, P. "Gods of the State: Atheism, Enlightenment and Barbarity." Politics and Religion in the New Century: Philosophical Reflections (2009): 20. Web. 20 Oct. 2012.
Integrating Faith and politics can be difficult. Arguments can be made for whether to have complete separation of faith and politics, or to fully integrate the two. A balanced middle-ground between separation and integration can be looked at also. Examples of each can be looked at in history. Complete separation of faith and politics has consequences (both positive and negative). Government that is separated from faith can be efficient, but very inhumane and controlling. Complete integration of faith and politics is influenced by God and the Bible, but it can be just as controlling as complete separation. Multiple disagreements in the Christian doctrine would also cause more challenges in the government. Having a middle ground where only some aspects of the government are influenced by religion can pose problems in certain areas. The middle ground could allow Christians to spread the Gospel (which is the goal of the church). When these three options are compared, one may see an option stand out as an obvious choice. The middle ground between separation and integration is where the church can both stay relevant in politics and participate in the great commission.
Third, religion is hypocritical. Although it might profess valuable principles, it sides with the oppressors. Jesus advocated helping the poor, but the Christian church merged with the oppressive Roman state, taking part in the enslavement of people for centuries. In the Middle Ages the Catholic Church preached about heaven, but acquired as much property and power as possible.
The American government prides itself on the foundational principle of democracy which allows individual voices to be heard. Afterall, the roots of power in our nation stem from the people. The Constitution was established to ensure the balance of powers among the federal government, state legislature, and the common people. Time, however, has worked against the American people in the battle towards democracy. The idea of a governing body drawing its power directly from its constituents has been undermined by the corrupt nature of modern politics where politicians act out of self-interest. While the Constitution and later amendments had every intention of securing basic liberties, certain limitations later undermined the original intentions of the founding fathers to give power back to the people by placing the larger majority of power in the hands of the state.
Government effects my life everyday in a vast variety of ways. From the quality of the milk that I drink in the morning, to the license and Insurance I need to drive my vehicle to school and work. Government also effects the taxes that are deducted from my salary. The government uses this money to protect consumers and provide services for the public amongst many other things.
...be taken to the extent of life or death due to the importance religion has in one’s life. The use of secrets to protect harmful truths or opposing powers that create harm the prestige of a religion is also a common action that is believed to be necessary to keep balance within a community. The constant influential attributes that religion possess can dictate the actions that somebody with perform. It is viewed solely as a positive system that creates peace between beings, however religion obtains negative factors that also negatively influence believers. People tend to turn to religion as the answer for the unknown as well as allowing it to dictate the majority of aspects in a human’s life. This prevents people from deciding their own unique path in life and disabling them from further educating themselves about available answers to questions they are unaware of.
Religion manifests in our midst by our parents. These illusions are "ready made." They are handed down to us from generations. We accept these ready-made ideas because these wishes speak of what is most important to us and what we're most afraid of, for example death. "Death itself is not extinction, is not a return to inorganic lifelessness, but the beginning of a new kind of existence which lies on the path of development to something higher"(pg.23). He states that religious ideas satisfy everything we are most terrified by. In reality we project human
A filibuster procedure that allows a senator to speak against a bill for as long as he or she can stand and talk. It can become a formidable obstacle or threat against controversial bills near the end of a legislative session. (Gibson, Robinson pg.243) Some of the reasons why the filibuster is regarded an obstacle to legislation starts off with the two-thirds rule which basically requires the approval of at least two-thirds of senators before a bill can be debated on the Senate floor. This type of rule allows minority of senators to block controversial legislation. This rule also gives the senators the opportunity to vote on both sides of an issue. (Gibson, Robinson pg. 243 para 2) A filibuster can become a potent and ever-present threat against controversial legislation near the end of a session. An example of this is when a lieutenant governor may refuse to recognize the sponsor of a controversial bill because of the fear of a filibuster will delay the process for the legislative proposals. Something really interesting about filibuster that happened in the past is when State Senator Bill Meir of Euless was able to speak for forty-three hours in 1977 against a bill with the public reporting of on the job accidents. By doing this he was able to capture the world’s record for the longest filibuster, which he held for years. (Gibson, Robinson, pg. 243, para 5.) In my own aspect of the view of filibustering, I think its abusive power is a threat to legislation because it can become even deadlier when senators decide to use a tag team approach taking turns against a bill. (Gibson, Robinson, pg. 243 para 5) Another great example is recently Texas State Senator ...
Religion is an organized collection of beliefs and cultural systems that entail the worship of a supernatural and metaphysical being. “Religion just like other belief systems, when held onto so much, can stop one from making significant progress in life”. Together with religion come traditions that provide the people with ways to tackle life’s complexities. A subscription to the school of thought of great scholars
“Religion is an institution established by man for various reasons. Exert control; instill morality, stroke egos, or whatever it does. Organized, structured religions all but remove god from the equation. You confess your sins to a clergy member, go to elaborate churches to worship, and told what to pray and when to pray it. All those factors remove you from god.”
... of the majority, the minority endures oppression. The quality of government suffers when it has been mixed too much with religion, and the quality of religious motives suffer when they have been polluted by political motives.