14. Emergent leadership theory Emergent leaders are leaders that develop over time by their constant contributions, frequent presence, and continuous progress as the group grows and becomes stronger. Leaders are most effective when their style matches their followers’ maturity and readiness. These leaders rise to the occasion when no one else is mature, confident, or competent enough to do so. An emergent leader practices the art of putting themselves in situation others do not wish to be in. Then when the task is complete, these leaders step back down and rise once they are needed again. For example, when working in a group on a project, one student may take the roll of the leader. Shortly after, this leader realizes they do not understand …show more content…
The gap between men and women produce three important concepts that reason the difference. First is the discussion of the better leader- men or women? It has been studied that women approach their followers with an interactive style with the encouragement of sharing power and information with others, participation, and self-worthiness to others. On the other hand, men have a consistency to be more task-oriented in their leadership styles and emerge in short-term conditions. The simple claim that women are just different than men, can be argued with the idea that men have effective traits for leadership. Women are less likely to negotiate and as a leader, this leads to lack of communication. And as discussed, leadership’s main ingredient is communication. Without it, nothing gets across to followers, and nothing is reciprocated to leaders. As a leadership position becomes larger and larger, (such as a CEO’s leadership position) there are fewer and fewer women holding these positions. The biggest question is why? Generally, females and males share the leadership values, work equally as hard to accomplish their goals, and react accordingly. Society plays a huge role in the gender gap. Some jobs aren’t even offered to women because of their gender and women …show more content…
Primary service is the key. Many view this as a contradiction because the leader is leading and serving. How can a person do both? Good servant leaders are good listeners. The communication between the leader and the follower being served allows the leader to listen to the follower first, in order to understand what the other person has to say and to understand their needs. These leaders practice empathy as well. Understanding what the follower is facing or feeling is comforting to the follower because it validates their importance to another person. The ability to heal a person through care and the concern for a person’s well being is another quality of a servant leader. These are only a few of the characteristics that generate a strong servant leader. Mother Teresa said, “The miracle is not that we do this work, but that we are happy to do it.” Her words describe exactly what servant leaders do. Servant leaders serve others willingly because they find joy and pleasure in doing so. The outcome of serving others in this manner is growth and social impacts for a greater good. When there is an improvement in self-actualization, followers improve in their goal reaching or task completion by understanding their full potential to do
Servant leadership, as defined by Kretiner and Kinkicki (2015, p.486), is putting the needs of others, including employees, customers, and community ahead of one’s own needs. This management style requires selflessness and humility from management so the organization can focus on serving key stakeholders. There are ten characteristics of a servant-leader as identified in the text
There has been a bit of research done on the nature of servant leadership. The belief is that many organizations are moving from the traditional style of leadership to a more servant based style. Larry C. Spears (2010) and Kent Keith (2016) note a few characteristics of one who is a servant leader. The characteristics proposed by Spears (2010) are listening, empathy, healing, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, commitment to others growth, and community building. These traits will often manifest naturally becoming more enriched as time goes by through experience. Keith (2016) references only four elements of servant leadership. He begins with an element of morality, then of the servant focus, concern for others’
Servant leadership is a philosophy and set of practices that augments the lives of individuals, builds better organizations, and creates a more just and caring world, they put the team first, and themselves second (MindTools, 2015). Servant leaders are able to demonstrate their traits through interaction with followers and other leaders within the organization. The characteristics of servant leaders include their commitment to the growth of people, stewardship, and building community, and provide leaders with the opportunity to experience change and to invite followers to change (Savage-Austin & Honeycutt 2011). Servant leadership encourages leaders and followers to ‘raise one another to higher levels of motivation and morality’, and set their leadership focus: follower’s first, organizations second, their own needs last (Sendjaya, Sarros, & Santora, 2008). The servant leader focuses on the needs of others to include team members.
The Servant Leader discusses the importance of leaders who adopt a service oriented attitude in which they care for the needs of others before their own. A servant leader need not be an actual servant or have ever been a servant to become a servant leader. Rather, a servant leader is born with or adopts an “others first” disposition. Climbing through the ranks may help to create a servant leader, though it is not necessary. When leaders choose to see that the needs of their followers or their organizations are the highest priority they become servants.
The CEO’s inability to see her values and strengths that she brought to the organizations was also a barrier to her success. Other barriers presented were gender difference and prejudice. Gender difference is a barrier to women’s advancement in commitment to employment and motivation to lead. According to Northouse (2013), one gender difference that advantages men in leadership is that men are more likely than women to ask for what they want. People must negotiate with others to access the right positions, experiences, and opportunities in both the professional and domestic spheres. Women are less likely to negotiate than men are, the negotiations needed to ascend leadership are often unstructured and ambiguous in which is why that particular disadvantages women. For example, when Lisa approached her boss and asked about the path to a partnership, he shut her down with many reasons why he assumed that the was not an appropriate candidate. Lisa chose not to defend
Powell and Graves’s study shows that “the gender gap in leadership is a global phenomenon whereby women are disproportionately concentrated in lower-level and lower-authority leader ship positions compared to men” (as cited in Northouse, 2016, p. 399). I couldn’t have agreed more with the statement; I have come across all of people from different aspects of lives. I have noticed that females’ interactions and how they are perceived and or accepted are quite different from males, whether at the workplace, school, in social gathering like religious services, around families and friends, etc. This includes the communication, uncertainty that arises in a professional environment that must do with our
Servant leadership can be thought of as an inverted triangle where the leader is supporting the organization at the point. As a result of this leadership style, leaders are more in tune with their teams. They have more insight on their team and the inner workings of their organizations.
“How men and women differ: Gender differences in communication styles, influence tactics, and leadership styles” is another article explaining gender differences in leadership. According to the article, women encounter different challenges in the workplace with the glass ceiling and wage gap being the most popular issues. Though, in the United States the male-female wage gap has decreased, the women still earn about 77% of the amount men get. In matters concerning education, women are earning the same degrees as men but they make the small number of working people as compared to men. For example, in 2010 women in United States made up 47.2% of the students taking law and 36.8% of MBAs received.
According to Robert Greenleaf, a servant leader is a “servant first… It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first”. A servant-leader focuses primarily on the growth and well-being of people and the communities to which they belong. Martin Luther King Jr. demonstrates servant leadership in the following quote:
The book addressed a central issue of male dominated leadership in the business field and suggested solutions written based on her own personal stories using research, and offering advice to help women achieve their goal. Therefore, Sandberg suggested that the most effective way is for women to find careers they love and have ambition to reach the top of a leadership structures. In addition, she mentioned the importance of marrying someone who will be supportive of a woman’s ambition, both at home and at work, and an equal partner in actualizing that vision. Therefore, she solved the issue of male dominated leadership through defining the problem, suggest strategies for improvement, and guide working women to help change the professional climate.
In the book, Sally Helgesen cites the “Feminine Principles” brought forth by Anita Roddick, who is the founder of The Body Shop as basic principles that could help to distinguish, or rather help to further define men and women leaders. The principles include, caring, making intuitive decisions, not getting hung up on hierarchy, having a sense of work being part of your life, putting labor where your love is, being responsible to the world and knowing that the bottom line should not be the only driving factor. These are the principles that encompass the “feminine principles” within the context of the text. While these principles are broad, they are not exclusive to women, however, women in general exhibit these qualities in more pounced ways than men.
Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith.” (Smith, 2001) As a Servant Leader you must lead by example and demonstrate charismatic traits. Throughout the bible many of the leaders posed the necessary characteristics and demonstrated the necessary behaviors to live a righteous life. Jesus Christ modeled the behavior of servant leadership and exemplified every area of it. When Jesus humbled himself onto death that is servant leadership; “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends” (John
When you think of a CEO of a company or of world political leaders, do you think of a man or of a woman? Many, if not most of us, see these positions as being held by men. In this essay, I will explain why women are still not equal to men. In the first paragraph I will discuss inequalities that happen in the workplace. The second section will show the differences that occur within the athletic world. Thirdly, I will explain the differences in education and home life. Even though we are approaching the twenty-first century, women in our society are still not equal to men.
Gender inequality is present in all aspects of human society, from culture, politics, and economic stand point to personal relationships. Gender inequality can be viewed as a major problem especially within the business world (Corporation, 2016). In the past, men are seen as leaders in all aspects. For example, men could work without any criticisms, they could participate in political issues and were given higher education. Women on the other hand, were given no political participation, criticized for working outside the household as they were responsible for chores such as takes care of their children, cooking or cleaning and given limited education compared to men. Although there are claims rights equality of women in 21st century and much has been written about it in the field of business (Player, 2013), but there is still a gap between male and female. This essay aims to explore the impact of gender inequality in business and will analyze the details in terms of the men are given high pay and specific jobs over women.
Barriers to women’s success as leaders is not due to social obstacles but rather other factors. “Barriers for Women to Position of Power” hones in on opposing evidence that illustrates that it is not societal obstacles that hinder women from leadership opportunities but, differing from males in leadership styles, behavioral characteristics. Moral reasoning is an important factor in leadership roles, it can determine if is fit leader can resolve a challenging situation. Women and Leadership states, “the male moral development and therefore the traditional model id human development is conflict- and evaluation-based while female moral development is based on relationships and communication” (Klenke 1996). Men and women have different temperament and cognitive abilities. Women are more commonly associated with communion traits described as “sympathy and warmth and having a concern for other people” (Etaugh 2010). Men, on the other hand, are associated with agentic traits which is depicted ambitious, directive, and all about accomplishing tasks. Throughout history, male experiences have been more commonly seen in society, therefore, their temperament is well established in leadership positions unlike women’s. Women are good with responsibilities, communication, among other lead traits which would be great advantages to have in a leadership position if given the chance, rather than solely focusing on male