Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Juvenile courts and corrections
Juvenile delinquency research
Juvenile justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Juvenile courts and corrections
Every day violent crimes are being committed in the Unites States by juveniles, between the ages of twelve and fifteen, and are tried for these crimes in juvenile courts. The juveniles are being prosecuted in a juvenile court and are receiving a lesser sentence, than an adult for the violent crimes. Some people believe that teens should not be tried as an adult and should just be tried as a juvenile. Juveniles should be tried as an adult, in an adult court, when they are charged with a murder, a sexual offense, and having been previously tried and convicted of two prior offenses.
Prior to the 1800’s children over the age of seven were tried in an adult court and upon conviction went to adult prison. In the nineteenth century it was believed that children lacked the mental capacity that comes with age and should be tried and rehabilitated separate from adults. In 1899 the first juvenile court was founded, in Chicago, with two basic principles. It was believed that juveniles could not be held accountable for their actions and could be rehabilitated. A “get tough” approach has been adopted my many states, one example is California’s Proposition 21, passed in 2000. (Juvenile) California’s Proposition 21 states that prosecutors have the right to send “juveniles accused of felonies directly to adult court.” (Juvenile)
Murder is not a school prank. Every jurisdiction in the United States has a different definition for murder. A law made by the courts defines it as “the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought.” (Murder) For a juvenile to be charged with murder it does not have to be planned or intentional; they can just be an accomplice. A juvenile, between the age of twelve and fifteen, who commits an adul...
... middle of paper ...
...ns Today 75.4 (2013): 60-64. Academic Search Complete. Web. 18 Apr 2014.
Flesch, Lisa M. “Juvenile Crime And Why Waiver Is Not The Answer.” Family Court Review 42.3
(2004):583-596. Academic Search Complete. Web. 18 Apr. 2014.
“Juvenile Justice." Issues & Controversies On File: n. pag. Issues & Controversies.
Facts On File News Services, 31 Mar. 2002. Web. 21 Apr. 2014. .
"Juvenile Law." Gale Encyclopedia of American Law. Ed. Donna Batten. 3rd ed. Vol. 6. Detroit: Gale, 2011. 112-119. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
McShane, Marilyn D., and Franklin P. Williams. "Aftercare." Encyclopedia of Juvenile Justice.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003. 4. Print.
"Murder." Gale Encyclopedia of American Law. Ed. Donna Batten. 3rd ed. Vol. 7. Detroit: Gale,
2010. 151-155. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.
Within the last five years, violent offenses by children have increased 68 percent, crimes such as: murder, rape, assault, and robbery. Honestly, with these figures, it is not surprising at all that the Juveniles Courts focus less on the children in danger, and focus more on dangerous children. This in fact is most likely the underlying reasoning behind juveniles being tried as adults by imposing harsher and stiffer sentences. However, these policies fail to recognize the developmental differences between young people and
Jenson, Jeffrey and Howard, Matthew. "Youth Crime, Public Policy, and Practice in the Juvenile Justice System: Recent Trends and Needed Reforms." Social Work 43 (1998): 324-32
The process of transferring juveniles to adult courts has shown no effects on decreasing recidivism or a deterrent outcome. Waiver as it is known has three means by which a juvenile can be transferred to an adult court. Judicial waiver offenses, statutory exclusions, and concurrent jurisdiction are the three methods in which a waiver can occur. This research will describe each one of these methods with detail. It will also provide statistical facts showing why waiver can be a very debatable topic within the juvenile criminal justice system. In its totality it will discuss the arguments for and against waiver.
Bartollas, Clemens and Miller, Stuart J. (2014). Juvenile justice in america (7 ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, 58-60.
Vito, Gennaro F., and Clifford E. Simonsen. Juvenile justice today. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2004. Print.
juvenile justice” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011) is to detour juvenile crimes and not be so easy on
Larry J. Siegel, Brandon C. Welsh. "Juvenile Delinquency Theory, Practice, and Law." Linda Schreiber Ganster, n.d. 549.
Sharon Cohen. Prosecuting kids as adults: Some state ponder changes. 2007. 26 May 2010 .
Pagnanelli, E. (2007). CHILDREN AS ADULTS: THE TRANSFER OF JUVENILES TO ADULT COURTS AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF ROPER V. SIMMONS. The American Criminal Law Review, 44(1), 175-194. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/230359891?accountid=12610
This paper will discuss the history of the juvenile justice system and how it has come to be what it is today. When a juvenile offender commits a crime and is sentenced to jail or reform school, the offender goes to a separate jail or reforming place than an adult. It hasn’t always been this way. Until the early 1800’s juveniles were tried just like everyone else. Today, that is not the case. This paper will explain the reforms that have taken place within the criminal justice system that developed the juvenile justice system.
There has always been controversies as to whether juvenile criminals should be tried as adults or not. Over the years more and more teenagers have been involved in committing crimes. In some cases the juries have been too rough on the teens. Trying teens as adults can have a both positive and negative views. For example, teens that are detained can provide information about other crimes, can have an impact in social conditions, and serve as experience; however, it can be negative because teens are still not mature enough for that experience, they are exposed to adult criminals; and they will lose out on getting an education.
The United States has been affected by a number of crimes committed by juveniles. The juvenile crime rate has been increasing in recent years. Everyday more juveniles commit crimes for various reasons. They act as adults when they are not officially adults. There is a discussion about how juveniles should be punished if they commit heinous crimes. While many argue that juveniles who commit serious crimes, such as murder, should be treated as adults, the fact is, juveniles under the age of eighteen, are not adults, and should not be treated as such.
In juvenile court, the judge must decide if the teen gets tried as an adult or minor. If the juvenile gets sent to a juvenile detention center for murder they will live their lives there until they are twenty one, but if tried as an adult they will serve so many years in prison. There is a grey area of law for certain teens that commit serious crimes. In this case of the grey law, each state gets to decide upon the particular state how they person is tried. For most cases pertaining to the juvenile courts are case by case bases. Many believe that it isn’t fair for the teens to be locked up with adults. The U.S. House of Representatives made the Juvenile Justice Act encouraging states to find alternatives to having the teens go through such a process with people much older than themselves (Locked Up…).
The controversy of juveniles being tried as adults has plagued the U.S. for years now. If kids do not have the same rights as adults do and aren’t allowed to vote, drink alcohol, smoke, or drive until a certain age, is it acceptable for them to receive the same punishments as adults? It is questions like these that have caused endless debates to erupt in courtrooms. Locking minors in prisons may get them off the streets and reduce overall criminal activity, but there are issues of morality affecting people’s judgments. When people consider teens’ underdeveloped brains and emotionality, the pros and cons of being sentenced as adults, and the process of being tried, perspectives tend to change toward juvenile defendants. This practice of trying minors as adults is one Americans need to face and resolve in
Today?s court system is left with many difficult decisions. One of the most controversial being whether to try juveniles as adults or not. With the number of children in adult prisons and jails rising rapidly, questions are being asked as to why children have been committing such heinous crimes and how will they be stopped. The fact of the matter is that it is not always the children's fault for their poor choices and actions; they are merely a victim of their environment or their parents. Another question asked is how young is too young. Children who are too young to see an R rated film unaccompanied are being sent to adult prisons. The only boundaries that seem to matter when it comes to being an adult are laws that restrain kids from things such as alcohol, pornography, and other materials seen as unethical. Children that are sent to adult prison are going to be subjected to even more unprincipled ideas and scenes. When children can be sent to jail for something as minor as a smash and grab burglary, the judicial system has errors. The laws that send juveniles to adult prisons are inhumane, immoral, and unjust. Kids are often incompetent, which leads to unfair trials. Adult prisons are also very dangerous for minors, and in many cases this leads to more juvenile crimes.