preview

The Consequences Of Juvenile Crimes

analytical Essay
1249 words
1249 words
bookmark

The United States has been affected by a number of crimes committed by juveniles. The juvenile crime rate has been increasing in recent years. Everyday more juveniles commit crimes for various reasons. They act as adults when they are not officially adults. There is a discussion about how juveniles should be punished if they commit heinous crimes. While many argue that juveniles who commit serious crimes, such as murder, should be treated as adults, the fact is, juveniles under the age of eighteen, are not adults, and should not be treated as such.
Juveniles are not mature enough or developed psychologically, and, therefore, do not consider the consequences of their actions. In the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” by Thompson, …show more content…

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that the united states has been affected by a number of crimes committed by juveniles. they act as adults when they are not officially adults.
  • Argues that juveniles are not mature enough or developed psychologically, and should not try them as adults.
  • Analyzes how garinger argues that juveniles should not be treated as adults if they commit horrible crimes.
  • Argues that juveniles who suffer from mental illness should not be treated as adults because they are not fully conscious of their actions.
  • Argues that juveniles should be treated as adults if they commit crimes and sentenced to life in prison. being mentally challenged does justify committing heinous crimes.
  • Opines that juveniles are a diversified group and should not be treated as adults. they could be placed in centers of rehabilitation to rehabilitate themselves.

Their brains develop in different stages and they learn skills that they need to learn at certain time. In the article “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences”, by Garinger, she argues that juveniles should not be treated as adults if they commit horrible crimes. Garinger states that juveniles should not be sentenced to life in prison without parole. She states that the court is considering life in prison without parole for juveniles who commit capital crimes. Garinger says that juveniles are immature, and still developing, so they can not be held to the same standards as adults. The writer add that as a juvenile court judge, she has seen how that juveniles can change and may become rehabilitated. For example, the court has already struck down death penalty and the life in prison without parole for juveniles or for young offenders convicted of non-homicide. According to the article, “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life In Prison,” Paul Garinger states that “Brain imaging studies reveal that the regions of the adolescent brain are responsible for controlling thoughts, actions, and emotions are not fully developed. They can not be held to the same standards when they commit terrible crimes.” If this is true, there is no a reason to treat juveniles as

Get Access