Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)

944 Words2 Pages

The regulation of industrial relations and employment relationships in Australia through government policies and state intervention dates back to 1904 through Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (Cth). Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) is the major employment law that is presently used and supersedes the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005 (Nankervis et al. 2017). This section of the report aims to give comprehensive understanding regarding Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and assesses the impact of this law in encouraging employer-employee collaboration.

The major provisions of this law include the Fair Work Commission and the Fair Work Ombudsman, modern awards, minimal wages objectives, the National Employment Standards, agreements …show more content…

There are three types of enterprise agreements: single-enterprise agreement, an agreement between one or more employers with common interests and employee(s); multiple-enterprise agreement, a contract between employer(s) with disparate interests and employee(s); and greenfield agreements, an agreement related to employer or employers’ new enterprise before any employment occurs (Fair Work Ombudsman 2017). X. Some academics believe that the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) encourages the significance and involvement of trade unions, which is signaled by the increasing number trade unions membership in 2009 (Gollan 2009; Sloan 2010). However, Hardy and Howe (Cooper 2010) believes that the Fair Work Act symbolises a shift from the situation in which trade unions as the key player in communicating workers’ demands to an environment where trade unions are regarded as an optional participant or negotiation agent in bargaining …show more content…

This method aims to quash employers’ non-negotiable attitude during negotiations with employees to produce an enterprise agreement. The concept of this method comprises the requirement of attending meetings at negotiated and acceptable times, reciprocation and genuine deliberation toward proposals, along with being impartial and non-discriminatory during the bargaining process (Sloan 2010). This statute is frequently criticised because good-faith bargaining’s obligations do not assure that the discussion will not be a mere exchange of views or consultation between employer and employee. In addition, if negotiation reaches a stalemate, employer is allowed to suggest an employee vote, which empowers employer to decide the extent to which employee’s inputs are incorporated into the terms of agreement. Thus, good-faith bargaining is often viewed as facilitating but does not guarantee bargaining relations (Walpole 2015). This argument is correct to a certain extent, however, the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) successfully provides a set of elaborate support mechanism for the transition into shaping a collective oriented bargaining environment that has steered Australia away from difficulties that follow these provisions and besets countries such as the United States, United Kingdom,

Open Document