Workingman's Paradise Analysis

2277 Words5 Pages

Both life and it’s working conditions during the time of the changing of centuries was challenging and harsh throughout Australia. This is quite a drastic change to the Australia that is known today. Despite the hardships Australia still had it’s reputation and title throughout the 19th century of bliss, known as a ‘working man’s paradise’. This title was based on the offerings that Australia gave to it’s “workers” opposed to Europe's working options. The question is then asked was this ‘Working man’s paradise” a triumph or tragedy. Australia’s “Workingman's paradise” was a phrase used by colonial politicians and employer groups to attract workers to the colonies that made up Australia in the 1800s. It is the ideal place of work, where the …show more content…

A racial hierarchy had made it’s way into the Australian lifestyle. A white Australia point of view was taken from the British, back from when they first settled in Australia (1788). The white settlers had immediately “formed racist beliefs about the Aboriginal people.” British superiority and culture was spread through literature and teachings to young children in school, so from a young age children were taught who was “in charge”, this was done so young children feared Aboriginals and felt superior to them from a young age. Unbeknownst to these children, the Aboriginals were the original land owners and custodians. The British took their land thinking it was “terra nullius”however upon arriving the Aboriginals and white settlers were courteous with each other, but it was not long before “cultural misunderstandings began to arise”. Indigenous Australian children were ripped away from their families, whilst others were forced to have children with white people to eliminate the race and culture all together, to make Australia an all white nation. Aboriginals like other non white Europeans didn’t have the same working opportunities or the benefits of the basic wage. Aboriginals were not entitled to vote and were taken off any voting rolls. They were treated with disrespect and …show more content…

It was based of workers and their under payment and rights, the case was largely built around workers having enough to pay for the expenses of their own life and their families. Henry Bournes Biggins was the president of the Court at the time and he took it to himself to work out the minimum the average worker with a wife and three children would need to support their family. Factors like food, transport, fares, clothing and life insurance were all taken into consideration. In conclusion it was decided that the basic wage would consist of 42 shillings ($4.20) would be enough for the average family to make it through a week, or seven shilling a per day. For an unskilled man this was the minimum that he and his family could live on. In the end Australian workers were at a much higher advantage than those in other countries, they received the basic wage, eight hours of work a day, pension after 65 years of age, assistance if unable to work and annual dental check ups for children. Despite all these advantages it still had its criticisms. Women were not covered by the basic wage. They were still paid much less than the 42 shillings that men received, they were earning 54 percent of a man's wage even if they were working in the exact same job. This was a big step in the right direction for Australia. For

Open Document