Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exegesis on Ephesians 5:21-33
Analysis to Ephesians 5:21-33
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Exegesis on Ephesians 5:21-33
Introduction
Ephesians 5:21-33 addresses the roles of the husband and the wife in light of the position each holds as a result of being in Christ. The passage is located in the latter half of the book of Ephesians, which is developed primarily around the “walk” passages. Chapter 4-6 are the direct application of chapters 1-3. The commands to husbands and wives are found in the last exhortation to walk carefully. The focus of the exhortation to “walk carefully” is a variety of relationships: husband/wife, children/parents, with a focus on fathers, and slaves/masters. This passage teaches how redemption and the sanctification process is to affect these relationships, including the marriage relationship between a man a woman. In other words, as the transforming process of sanctification “pushes back” the effects of the fall in the life of a man or a woman in the context of marriage, it will look different for each gender because the effects of the fall have been distinct for each gender. There is a clear distinction in the commands given to the man and the woman concerning the transformed life in the context of marriage because of these distinctions in gender. In examining Ephesians 5:20-33, this paper seeks to present how the complementarian side of the gender debate provides the best interpretation for gender roles.
1 Prescription for mutual submission as it relates to a wife’s submission (5:21-22, 24, 33) http://cbmw.org/book-reviews/biblical-interpretation/fifty-crucial-questions-mutual-submission/
Ephesians 5:21 says, “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ.” In the admonition “submit to one another” the verb hupotasso has as its basic meaning “to order oneself under another, to yield, to consider the other above on...
... middle of paper ...
...der? The phrase “one another” is often understood to evoke a sense of reciprocation. However, the word translated “one another” in Greek is the term allÄ“lois and its use in the New Testament often has nothing to do with reiprcol action. The cmman to submit, while understand as a general command for all Christians, is not specifically given directed to husbands. Only the wives receive such instruction. Since Paul says the marriage relationship is patterned after hrist relationship to his church it is impotant to see that there is not eciprocal submission between Christ and his brind; neither is there tobe such between husbands and wives. As a result, while there are mutual obligations for husbands and wives, there is not mutual submission in the recipricol sence. http://www.dennyburk.com/mutual-submission-in-ephesians-521/ 5. Paul’s larger “in Christ” theology
However, it’s evident that Paul had concerns of the people in Ephesus, and the nature of this letter was not addressed to a culture that did not know God, but to one that needed guidance in establishing a relationship with him. Jack J. Gibson stated, “While submission of wives to husbands was commonplace among Greeks and Jews, it was extremely rare for Roman wives to be in submission to their husbands. The average Roman wife did not submit to her husband. Instead, she continued to submit to her father (if she was in the more common marriage without manus), or if she had borne sufficient children and had been emancipated, she submitted to no one.”3
In the household codes of the New Testament the traditional patriarchal social order is reaffirmed, not simply for secular society, but for Christian community. The concept that children are to obey their parents, wives their husbands and slaves their masters is restated in no fewer than five places in the New Testament: Ephesians, Colossians, 1 Timothy, Titus, and 1 Peter. Conversely all subjugated persons can be viewed as relations of wives to husbands, children to father, and servants to masters. Patriarchalism refers to the total structure of society in all theses types of relations of domination and subjugation; sons to father, wives to husband, and slaves to masters. Also, there is delegated domination and subjugation within the paternal
...ty in the world that even remotely resembles it”. (p91) Going forward what is needed is for the Corinthians is to stop being self-centered and repent. The church is God’s sanctuary. Paul’s portrayal of the church expands upon the role of the “Father Son and Holy Spirit in relation to the church”(p91). Which minimizes the role of its leaders, the leaders are not to be put on a pedestal. Because all the glory goes to God the leaders are mere servants of their flock and servants of God. The growth in God’s field is caused by God not humans as for God’s building the only foundation is that of Jesus Christ, and God’s temple is where the Holy Spirit dwells. According to Romans 8:17 what is Jesus’s is ours 17 Now if we are children, then we are heirs—heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory.
Olsen, Glenn W. (Glenn Warren). Chirstian Marriage a Historical Study: Old Testament Views on Christian Marriage. Imprint: Crossroad Publishing Company. New York, NY, 2001.
Studying female authorship in colonial America, William Scheick notes that Puritans supported this attitude of subordination with Biblical passages. In the Old Testament, Adam declares Eve the bone of his bones and the flesh of his flesh. Because “she was taken out of man,” Adam resolves on calling her “woman.” Similarly, in the New Testament, Paul describes Christians as “members of [the Lord’s] body, of his flesh, and of his bones.” Whereas the Genesis passage refers to earthly matrimony, Paul addresses the spiritual marriage between Christians and the Bridegroom Christ. Scheick observes how these passages imply “the silent subordination of the second sex to men, [and] the reverence wives owe to their husbands” (62)....
They did not want to argue with their wives, nor jeopardize their family unit. Many men, attempting to uphold their male honor did not require that their wives share the same religious views; however, according to the monograph, “preserving manly independence did mean that husbands would keep their own counsel on religious matters and that wives would refrain from challenging those view too often or too forthrightly.” Despite the opinion of their husband, women did not give up on spreading the gospel. They continued on with their evangelical worship.
The author then turns her attention to five practices that can assist in carrying out the task of being a Christian in this postmodern world: having sex, eating, tithing, serving and praying. “In the context of this book I consider sex as fundamental to the practices of relationship and compassion, eating as a dimension of practicing relationship and justice, tithing in relation to the practice of simplicity, serving as a way of practicing compassion, and praying as a form centering. All five can be seen as practices of resistance embedded in ordinary life marked by Christian commitments to God and neighbor” (98). The author maintains faithful sexual practice in a marriage fosters ethical goods such as: vulnerability, self-sacrifice, self-love, and bodily belonging with one’s spouse. The common and ordinary practice of eating a meal as a family around the dinner table is noted as a necessary practice. Eating meals together is associated not only with strong families but with strong communities, concretized in Catholic teaching by the Eucharist. “The majority of American
Centuries of traditions has enabled men and women to define gender roles in society. Although some critics declare gender roles do not exist today, others believe they do. In society, men and women are defined by gender roles throughout their activities and emotions. A doctor is typically portrayed by a male while women rear the children and cook for the men. However, although still in existence, today these roles are less obvious but tend to have similar meaning when compared to the past. In ancient Greece, women suffered great hardships. Currently, females work, vote, and run for office. In comparison to ancient Greece, these activities are a phenomenal leap from being under the direct supervision of a male husband.
Throughout Greek and Roman mythology there are many themes, motifs, and symbols that are consistent amongst the different myths. Some of the more common ones include the abuse of mortals from the gods, the relationship between men and women, and the way in which lust operates in society. All of these are apparent in the writing style of Euripides in his text the Bacchae. This myth explores the battle between Dionysus, who has just returned dressed as a stranger, and Pentheus, who is the current ruler of the state, over the city of Thebes. As one reads this myth they will clearly identify some of the important subjects, however one detail that may not be noticed is the portrayal of Pentheus holding gender identity issues. There are many examples
In the chapter Veith states “marriage is a tangible manifestation of the relationship between Christ and the Church (2011, p. 79-80). The wife is to see Christ in her husband and love him as God loves her. While the husband is to love his wife like God loved the church. Being God put his all into the church to watch it grow and develop, the husband should do the same for his wife. If both partners are performing their roles adequately they will harbor the love of Christ within their relationship. The chapter also references precreation within the family. With the birth of a new child the parents are to care for the baby and bring them up in the way of the Lord. By looking at the family unit it is clear all members of the family have a specific role in which they function. The parents are to act as providers, educators, and express their love. While the children are to play, learn, and abide by their parents. Throughout the continued interaction of the family, each member will fulfill their vocation for the growth of the
The Christian meaning of fidelity is perceived by the majority of society to be strictly in the corporeal sense only. As a Christian we are called to look upon not only the physical reality but also the spiritual reality. The actual definition of fidelity is: 1) strict fulfillment of promises, duties, etc., 2) loyalty, 3) conjugal faithfulness. In light of that we must look at the meaning and practice of fidelity in a Christian marriage.
The Corinthians verse depicts Pauls’ idea of a non-hierarchal marriage, that is infused with equality through the equal marital duties that each spouse is expected to demonstrate. As Garland argued, the main idea behind the Corinthians text is the mutuality that should be instilled in marriage.13 The evidence that proves this reoccurring idea of mutualism, is seen throughout the entire passage but more specifically through the excerpts about equal marital duties and “mutual consent.”14 that are the same requirements for each spouse. However, the Timothy verse is opposite as there is no gender equality present and the main message is assigning specific gender-roles. A popular argument is that the Timothy passage is, “the one most referred to by those who would limit the freedom and authority of women in the church.”15 This passage stirs up controversy as it is one of the most common passages in the New Testament that has bee accused of limiting women’s opportunities. The Corinthians and Timothy passages are evidently contradictory; the Corinthians passage has instilled an array of equality in marriage and the Timothy passage has designated distinct, but unequal gender-roles. The Corinthians writing is emphasizing the importance of a non-hierarchal marriage through the enforcement of identical marital duties. The Timothy passage offers a clear contradiction to this verse by
The number of feminist scholars critically assessing Biblical narrative has risen since the second feminist movement of the 1970s (Scholz 2014). A common theme of their scholarship has been to what extent the Bible may be seen to favour men. Some feminist scholars may not be able to legitimately assess the Bible and remain faithful to it because of such outdated views on women in a time when women’s equality is encouraged. I will firstly discuss the difficulties of being a feminist scholar and a Christian or Jew with particular reference to belonging to men, being of less value in society, and finally with a focus on key issues arising from Genesis 2 and 3 whereby gender roles and woman’s blame for the Fall of Man have been central to feminist interpretations. I will then assess ways in which such difficulties may be overcome with a different interpretation, beginning with refuting claims concerning the Creation story. This will be followed by analysing how the Bible is read and the value of historical context when doing so. By discussing these aspects, I will reach a conclusion as to how far you can be both a feminist scholar and a faithful Christian or Jew.
As Christians in a marriage many have decided to take words within the Bible and use them to their own benefits and scrutinized the meaning of what marriage is about. It already known that God made woman from man and that she is to be his helpmate. And the one reason why marriage is supposed to occurs is to keep believers from sexual sin or sexual immorality. Therefore, God asked for man to find a wife, so that he does not succumb to the sin of sex, which could further lead one into other forms of sin. Yet, Paul makes it clear that it is better to remain a single person because they can stay focused on God and commit themselves to him. Also, the apostle said that he wishes people to remain single because there will be many problems that will arise within a marriage. And he sent this letter to the people of Corinthians because God was not pleased with what he saw in these people. In the times of the Romans it was prevalent for the term of “Corinthian Girl” was loosely used to mean a
There are varieties of passages in the Old Testament that discuss the metaphor of marriage for the relationship between God/Israel. In the Old Testament, God’s relation with Israel is portrayed as a relationship between husband and wife. The book of Genesis two discuss about the creation of man and woman. Genesis two, God created man and gave him everything in the Garden of Eden, except for the tree of knowledge. God put man in the garden to take care of it. Adam was alone so God made a woman by taking one of the ribs from Adam. This metaphor can be reflected as how God wants to have a relationship with Israel. In Genesis two, God created humans to be the object of His love and creation.