Five Types Of Leadership Essay

The five different types of leadership strategies are laissez-faire, Autocratic, participative, transactional, and transformational. Each of these types of leadership have a different belief of how employees should be deployed. A successful leader must have the ability to influence other people and must be able to inspire, motivate and direct their activities. This push provided by leaders directs employees in the right direction to achieve group and organizational goals. Corporate leaders that demonstrate strong participative and transformational leadership qualities are more successful with new generations versus historical autocratic leaders that imposed their beliefs and opinions on their work force. The result of a leader adopting participative

Only highly experienced and trained employees who require little supervision fall under the laissez-faire leadership style. This leadership style hinders the production of employees needing supervision. The laissez-faire style produces no leadership or supervision efforts from managers. This often leads to poor production, lack of control and increasing costs(Johnson, n.d, para 2). The autocratic leadership style allows managers to make decisions alone without the input of others. Managers possess total authority and impose their will on employees. No one challenges the decisions of autocratic leaders. This leadership style only benefits employees who require close supervision. Creative employees who need time and space are unable to thrive with this leadership style (Johnson, n.d, para 3). The transformational leadership style depends on high levels of communication to meet goals. Leaders motivate employees and enhance productivity and efficiency through communication (Johnson, n.d, para 6). Participative leadership values the input of team members and peers. This leadership strategy boosts employee morale because they are able to contribute to the decision-making process (Johnson, n.d, para 6). Choosing to follow the beliefs of transactional and participative leadership benefits a wider variety of employees, where as laissez-faire and

They have no need to explain their rationale and followers must obey instructions without question. This form of leadership is dictatorship and absolute monarchy within a corporation (Bowen, 2015). In the past, the New York Times ranked among the top companies with autocratic leadership. a famous autocratic leader named Rosenthal lead the company during the 1970s. While it was not easy to work under such an autocratic leader; this style raised efficiency and contributed to bottom line growth in the highly demanding newspaper industry(Bowen, 2015). This worked in the past when businesses needed this form of control to ensure the growth of the company, however, times have changed. Success is made by the steps a leader choses to follow when leading a group of people. This form of leadership now leads to distress and dissension among staff, lowers morale, and leads to a decline in both quality and quantity of information (Bowen, 2015). Raines, the executive editor between 2001 and 2003 tried to follow Rosenthal’s footsteps. This autocratic style led to charges of highhandedness and callousness. His drive to get things done made him contemptuous, dismissive, and sarcastic. He centralized decision-making, and killed stories at will. Leaders choosing to use transformational and participative are more successful in