More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of the gold standard
Importance of political party in democracy
The importance of the gold standard
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On July 9, 1896 William Jennings Bryan delivered his famous Cross of Gold speech. It is known as one of the most unforgettable speeches ever given. In his speech he talked over the issues of the gold standard and why there should be free coinage of silver. However, this is not the only thing he discusses, it is just a fraction of it. With words of pure wisdom he had no problem sharing them with those who were willing to lend a listening ear. He was a very intellectual man who makes sure his audience understands what he is trying to interpret in his speeches. A political man with ideas of excellence and proof to back everything he believed, he had no issue fighting for change within the system. As a politician his main goal was to persuade …show more content…
Touching on how the gold standard is one of the most controversial issues to come about in all of history and needs to be repented. He wants all those in favor of free coinage of silver within the Democratic party to combine forces and take over the Democratic Party. Following his request, they did manage to do so and proposed their thoughts on to those with higher power. They will not take no for an answer and will no longer beg for it to be accepted. In his speech he says, they “fight in defense of our homes, our families, and posterity.” If their plans were to fail,which they had no doubt, then an agreement was made to suspend the coinage of …show more content…
The only right solution would be to do away with it completely. He is not criticizing the gold standard, although some people do believe that he just brings attention to what everyone else already knew. Income tax and free silver coinage were not seen unconstitutional until someone from the Supreme Court ruled it as such, this led to making citizens believe it as well. Mr. Bryan was trying to prove that it was not unconstitutional at all that was just the belief of one. Although, the ultimate decision is in the hands of the government. Gaining as allie Mr. Jefferson, well respected in the Democratic society, says the problem is with the banks being in circulation with paper money rather with the gold itself. The real question is if the gold standard is a good thing then he wants to know why their party has been said to try and replace with bimetallism? However just four months earlier they on board with the gold standard and would not amend it to enable two metals to be in circulation even of the whole world was involved. He says If the gold standard was truly good then he would not be working so hard to remove it but to improve it. When people look back in time they will realize that the gold standard was not needed, so why keep it? Without the restorations of money for the Constitution, how do you expect to have a
So, his role in the 1896 presidential campaign came down to this. However credible or not, he arouse the senses and got the blood boiling of the people, first of Emporia, then of the nation. The affect that this had was important, it is only when someone speaks frankly and possibly even out of context that people will listen to what it is that you have to say, especially if it is against the common thread of beliefs.
...transform rural areas into urban ones; and that is exactly what he did. He did vast transformations and now had another large accomplishment to be known for.
war often, for the sake of his country, but when he did he put in a
many problems faced by the nation during his time and set standards by which we still follow
He wanted to stress people right to liberty and fundamental rights as human beings as central values, making people united as a whole, rejecting the monarchy, aristocracy and the political power, he wanted citizens to be independent in thee way they implemented their civic duties, and as a way to disparage corruption.
Within his speech, and by looking at his diction and word choice, one could derive he is talking to an upper class group of men. He continually uses the word?gentlemen.? His statement?the worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House? makes it sound as if he is in a meeting of elected officials and decision makers. During the first part of the speech, he uses ethos to establish who he is, and why they should hear him.
Lyndon B. Johnson’s voice has drastically changed, and improved American History. He also has a huge role for enabling blacks to take part in voting. He would always be remembered as a kind-hearted person who simply wanted a world of peace. People will also remember this speech forever, by his effective use of rhetoric
This means he should be remembered for creating a successful political party, his likeliness and resemblance to the common man, and for how he kept together the country when the north and south had very opposing opinions.
He mentions the very recent violence that occurred in Selma, Alabama; where African Americans were attacked by police while preparing to march to Montgomery to protest voting rights discrimination. Without mentioning this violent event that occurred a week prior, there would not be much timeliness to his argument, and it wouldn’t have been as effective. The timeliness of his argument gave the speech a lot more meaning, and it heightened the emotions of many who heard the address. He is appealing to the emotions of many American people, both Congressmen and ordinary citizens, to encourage them to support his cause. He reminds us of all of the Americans around the world that are risking their lives for our freedom. He refers to them as “guardians of our liberty.” He also address the problem as the whole nation should be concerned not just the north, the south, or the African American
politician, war hero, and a leader he put his heart into it. Sure he may have made a
Once he was able to differentiate his public perception to whom he actually is as an individual it enabled
because he request to the audience that we must unite together to bring change in a society.
...large step towards world peace, thus this is way I believe he was an effective visionary leader.
...logy and goals, and also a opportunist and exploitative man in regard to opportunities within foreign policy as they were presented him.
Bryan pointed out flaws that the other contenders possessed and used this to his own advantage to receive the desired effect of acceptance. He presented the party’s platform on how they planned to make the free coinage of the silver happen; he also makes many points on how the government is not made up of humble beings, but instead, people that are selfish and do not have the good of the people in the forefront of their minds. Bryan really focused his efforts towards change. He stated multiple times that change in the nations currency was a must and did not shy away from telling the people that the exact same people who were promoting the competition of free silver coinage, had since changed their positions on the current gold standard to something completely different. By pointing out the