Walking In The City Rhetorical Analysis

613 Words2 Pages

Strategies and Tactics Exposed in Philadelphia In “Walking in the City”, written by Michel de Certeau, the concepts of strategies and tactics are discussed. Certeau begins with suggesting that having a trajectory will initiate movement of an operation. For example, one must have an idea, or concept, to start a project. Once the idea is made, an operation will be in the works and the concepts of a strategy will protrude. Strategies are concepts of early planning-when one decides to transform an area, they must rationally plan it. They are used by larger corporations such as construction firms, architects, and the rich and the powerful. However, with strategy comes tactic. Tactics are portrayed by those who are subordinate. These people tend to be opportunistic and defensive to challenge the ideas of organizational power structures. Tactics are meant to fight higher order through the creation of the people’s own laws and regulations. They are also personalized ways in how people get from one place to another. In the early developmental …show more content…

He stated that strategies are used by those within organizational power structures who can work with construction firms, architects, the rich and the powerful and who plan structures from bird’s eye point of view. People who create strategies are able to see things clearly without having emotions be a distraction, meaning that their plans do not include people. Tactics, mentioned by Certeau, are employed by those who are subordinate-the people who are residents of a city without any power. These people create their own laws and regulations to fight the higher order of people-such as construction firms, architects, and the wealthy. Tactics are what people do to challenge the strategies of the powerful groups. Tactics can also be the different, personalized ways of how people move around cities- usually different from an urban planner’s point of

Open Document