Admiral Stark's Plan Dog (WWII)

1331 Words3 Pages

Strategy depends on numerous analytical factors and some of these present challenges to planners. This essay will identify some of these challenges that strategists encountered during WWII. Moreover, it will present strategy as a fluid process requiring refinement throughout.
Admiral Stark’s strategic assessment and recommendations in the “Plan Dog” memorandum set the stage for Allied Coalition military strategy in Europe. He did this by presenting an operational assessment between conducting war alone or with allies. In his memorandum, he presented four courses of action for entry into the war and one reclama that predominantly supports Great Britain without entry into WWII. He also identifies different uses of national power instruments to maintain United States interest in the western hemisphere and discusses how United States strategy includes efforts to prevent the disruption of the British Empire.
Admiral Stark clearly presents true concern for the fall of the British by asserting anticipated losses to critical resources in the western hemisphere would threaten the United States. An example is the anticipated loss of countries in the region, such as Latin America and its natural resources. Our national interests may …show more content…

Britain wanted complete support to prevent Germany’s hegemony in Europe, but the people of the United States believed Japan was the real enemy. This became evident during the two most important conferences of World War II between the United States and Great Britain that established a solid coalition; Casablanca and Trident.
The strategy formulation framework will help identify the strategic decision made during the conferences and how the objectives, concepts, and resources changed through coalition discussions. Moreover, the changes did not significantly impact the conduct of the

Open Document