The Federalist No.'s 10 and 51
analytical Essay
433 words
The Federalist No.'s 10 and 51 The Federalist, No. 10, by James Madison is a clear expression of views and policies for a new government. Madison was a strong supporter and member of the Federalists whose main beliefs favored the Constitution. They also believed that the Articles of Confederation needed to be rewritten so that a new central government would control the power of the states. Madison differentiates between a Democracy and a Republic and later on decides on a Republic as his choice of government. A Republic is a type of government run by representatives who are elected by its citizens. Madison states that “however small the Republic may be, the Representatives must be raised to a certain number in order to guard against the cabals of a few; and that however large it may be, they must be limited to a certain number, in order to guard against the confusion of a multitude.” This means that the Republic should have a certain number of representatives large enough to overpower any outsiders, but not too many where-as nothing could be accomplished due to disagreement. Madison speaks of the problems of the present attempts at a new government saying “our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice, and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and over-bearing majority”. The crucial issue of Madison’s time was the right of the people. The people should be involved in their government, and know about how their government can work with them. Madison’s, The Federalist, No. 51 discusses separation of powers in the government and more of the Republican system of government. Madison says outright that “we see it particularly displayed in all the subordinate distributions of power, where the constant aim is to decide and arrange the several officers in such manner as that each may be a check on the other.” Madison states several things in his papers that will be used in the United States Constitution. He says: “authority will be derived from and dependent on the society, because society is broken into so many parts, interests and classes of citizens…”, ”government must protect the weak as well as themselves.”. “Principles of justice” and the “general good” of the people are also mentioned.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how madison's the federalist, no. 10, is a clear expression of views and policies for new government.
- Analyzes how madison talks about the problems of the present attempts at a new government, saying that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are often decided, not according to the rules of justice.
- Analyzes how madison's the federalist, no. 51 discusses separation of powers in the government and more of the republican system of government.
- Explains that madison states several things in his papers that will be used in the united states constitution.
- Analyzes how the federalist was written to squash the fears of the people that a central government would impede on their liberties.
- Explains that james madison's the federalist was written to explain to the people the new united states constitution and to convince the states to ratify it.
Related
- analytical
- Examples Of The Federalist Paper And Government Todayanalytical essayThe Federalist Papers and Government Today In The Federalist Papers by James Madison, Madison discuses various aspects of government and how the government must be organized in order to better represent the people. In The Federalist, No. 10 Madison discusses the nature of political factions and parties and how they can affect the government and its practices. The Federalist, No. 51 discusses instead how the government being in branches helps maintain liberties and better protect the American people. The topics mentioned in The Federalist Papers continue to explain and structure our government today.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how madison's the federalist papers explains various aspects of government and how it must be organized to better represent the people. madison discusses the nature of political factions and parties.
- Analyzes how madison states that a well-constructed union must control and break apart factions that may manipulate or prevent the passing of proper legislature or government controls.
- Analyzes how madison states that latent causes of faction are sown in the nature of man, and that the government must be fit to handle them and keep them from gaining control over legislature.
- Analyzes how madison explains the purpose of having multiple branches of government and how it protects the people.
- Analyzes how madison's federalists papers inspire and explain our government today and how it functions.
- Analyzes how madison's federalist papers have an influence on our government and how it functions today.
1034 wordsRead More - Constitutional Law: Federalist Paper Analysisanalytical essayIn “Federalist No. 39”, James Madison sets to outline and discuss how the planned Constitution conforms to the American view of Republican principles. In doing so he establishes that the decided form of government, post-Revolution, will be Republican in nature and that “If the plan of the convention, therefore, be found to depart from the republican character, its advocates must abandon it as no longer defensible”. Madison asks what distinctively makes a government Republican in nature. A few different governments are described, noting that, while they may be described as Republican, they are Republican in name only.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how james madison's "federalist no. 39" outlines how the planned constitution conforms to the american view of republican principles. madison asks what distinctively makes a government republican in nature.
- Analyzes how madison's distinction between the national and the federal constitution draws upon the central argument that the citizens make up states, from which authority is derived.
- Explains that the distinction between the designed roles played by the house of representatives and the senate has been lost due to the passage of the 17th amendment.
- Explains that the 17th amendment was passed as one of the progressive era amendments to reduce corruption and influence of big party bosses in politics.
544 wordsRead More - Federalist #10analytical essayMadison begins perhaps the most famous of the Federalist papers by stating that one of the strongest arguments in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. Madison defines that factions are groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions. Although these factions are at odds with each other, they frequently work against the public interests, and infringe upon the rights of others.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that madison's federalist paper argues that the constitution establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions.
- Explains that both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions.
- Explains that factions are inevitable due to the unequal distribution of property. men of greater ability and talent possess more property than those of lesser ability.
- Explains madison's view that there are only two ways to control a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests.
- Explains that direct democracies cannot control factious conflicts because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against an obnoxious individual or a strong majority.
- Argues that madison hopes that the men elected to office will be wise and good men the best of america. theoretically, those who govern should be the least likely to sacrifice the public good to temporary condition.
- Opines that in large republics, factions will be numerous, but weaker than in small, direct democracies where it is easier to consolidate their strength.
- Explains that the constitution's immediate object is to bring the present thirteen states into a secure union. the states farthest from the center of the country will be most endangered by foreign countries.
- Analyzes how madison concludes that he presents thee previous arguments to convince those who will not listen to those 'prophets of gloom' who say that the proposed government is unworkable.
935 wordsRead More - Madison vs. Marshallanalytical essayIn Madison’s work of Federalist No. 10, he identifies factions were a problem. He views them as “a dangerous vice”, but at the same time saw factions as a necessary evil. He mentions that “The regulation of these various and interfering interest forms the principal task of modern legislation; and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of government.” Here Madison states that factions, opposed in spirit to democratic ideals, spreading “unsteadiness and injustice” which are actually necessary for the function of a representative government. Throughout his paper, Madison explains how pure democracy wouldn’t be able to work, because it had “no cure for the mischief of faction.” He believed that this type of government will give so much power to the majority that it was doomed to fail. He sounded very confident that the new constitution would work. He believed of having a representative and a republic system. He had no doubt in mind that new constitution would be the end of the states embarrassment to the world. Madison saw democracy not as an ideal but something that could be modified to be fitted.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that madison and marshall's points of view differed from one another, and that the political landscape was different.
- Analyzes how madison identifies factions as a problem in federalist no. 10. he believes that pure democracy wouldn't work because it had no cure for the mischief of faction.
- Opines that marshall was erroneous by not accepting the constitutional celebration.
640 wordsRead More - Compare The Writings Of John Locke And Jean-Jacques Rousseauanalytical essayThroughout The Federalist No. 10, James Madison frequently used the term “public good”. What Madison proposed was that the public good is best protected by representatives elected from masses that hold an extensive variety of opinions. While this does put the security of some rights into the hands of the government, it also demonstrates a remarkable faith in both the individuals in charge and the individuals who elected them. The more a group of individual leaders feels the ability to express their differences, the safer the rights of the people will be, because as Madison asserted, “the increased variety of parties comprised within the Union, increase this security.” Thus, the protection of individual rights could be of benefit to a Republic that depends on the diversity and wisdom of a popularly elected
In this essay, the author
- Compares the writings of john locke and jean-jacques rousseau to the nation's founding documents.
- Analyzes how the founding documents echo both locke and rousseau's ideas. the constitution promises to promote the general welfare, but it pledges to provide for the common defense.
- Analyzes how the declaration of independence, which served as a defense of america's founding and existence, quotes locke in stating that humans have "unalienable rights" including, "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
- Analyzes how madison proposed that the public good is best protected by representatives elected from masses that hold an extensive variety of opinions. the more individual leaders feel the ability to express their differences, the safer the rights of the people.
- Explains that the united states of america was founded in the spirit of locke's ideals of natural, immutable individual rights.
583 wordsRead More - Pluralismanalytical essayIn Federalist No. 10, James Madison stresses that “measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.” Madison philosophized that a large republic, composed of numerous factions capable of competing with each other and the majority must exist in order to avoid tyranny of majority rule.# When Federalist No. 10 was published, the concept of pluralism was not widely used. However, the political theory that is the foundation for United States government was the influential force behind pluralism and its doctrines.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that many critics believe that faction representation is biased in favor of wealthy corporations and affluent individuals. schattschneider claims that the heavenly chorus sings with an upper-class accent.
- Analyzes how madison and the other founding fathers envisioned a country with political freedom and opportunity for every citizen. they hoped that america would avoid tyranny brought by an overwhelming majority.
- Analyzes how texas republican larry combest criticizes the bush administration for turning down the republican farm bill.
- Explains the concept of pluralism in federalist no. 10, which focuses on shared power among interest groups and competing factions.
- Analyzes how the bush administration felt that not enough money would be spent on the environment. pluralism is a large aspect of the united states' political system.
- Cites becker, elizabeth, evans, graham, hewnham, jeffrey, kernell, samuel, and gary c. jacobson, the logic of american politics.
1378 wordsRead More - All Politics Are Not National States Are Powerful Summaryanalytical essayMadison stated, “the first and most natural attachment of the people will be to the government of their respective states”.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the article "all politics are not national, states are powerful" argues that state politics are more important to the daily lives of americans.
- Opines that the argument being addressed in this article has my support due to the fact that certain laws such as abortion laws and gun laws pertain within certain states.
- Opines that brown's article "all politics are not national, states are powerful" supports his argument when brown quotes james madison. madison stated that the first and most natural attachment of the people will be to the government of their respective states.
- Argues that judis' "the federal government hold the power" opposes my position of the argument due to the fact that states have tried weakening power of federal government, but the federal government overcame power regardless.
- Argues that state politics matters more than national politics because of how personally involved i am in state issues and laws as well as the rest of the nation.
- Cites burn, l. (2013, july 16). "all politics are not national, states are powerful".
442 wordsRead More - Summary Of Madison's View On Human Natureanalytical essayMadison’s views about human nature: power and majority rule? Why did the Framers prefer repr+esentaTve democracy over direct democracy? Human nature: ±he implicit conclusions Madison draws from his condiTonal (if-then) logical statements are plain. Men are not angels, and therefore government is in fact necessary. Moreover, men are not always governable by angels or God. ±he people follow their passions and leaders su²er from ambiTon for power. ±hus, internal and external controls on government are necessary because men are governed by men? Majority Rule: A³er recognizing the need for a majority in rouTne votes, he asked when "a majority... united by a common interest or a passion cannot be constrained from oppressing the minority, what remedy can be found...?"
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes madison's views about human nature: power and majority rule. the framers prefer repr+esentatve democracy over direct democracy.
- Analyzes how federalist no. 10 addresses the question of how to guard against "factons", or groups of citzens with interests contrary to the rights of others or the interests of the whole community.
466 wordsRead More - Federalist No 10 Analysisanalytical essayFederalist No. 10: The central idea depicted by the text of Federalist Number 10, written by James Madison, is that the establishment of a federal government was key to a peaceful and well-managed nation. Madison also described factions as dangerous to the nation. In order to get everyone on the same page in terms of agreeance to a constitution, Madison adopted a desire to give everyone the same ideological beliefs. He thought that this would resolve the issues of too many factions containing opposition to the ideas of Federalism. The republican form of government also played a role in the establishment of the constitution by providing citizens to vote for the leaders that they wanted to run the country instead of running it themselves (Which
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the central idea depicted by the text of federalist no. 10, written by james madison, that the establishment of a federal government was key to peaceful and well-managed nation.
- Analyzes how james madison's federalist paper explained how each branch should be independent and equal. the executive, legislative, and judicial branches all perform checks on each other to ensure equality.
398 wordsRead More - Analysis Of The New Federal Constitution A Radical Experimentanalytical essayHe discusses how Madison noticed the problem of each of the 134 states having its own agenda. Madison even thought that people were interested in their local politics. They don’t think of the whole state or even the whole country (Wood, 2012). He wanted to change this and create a stronger government that would override certain state powers like money printing and the ability to pass tariffs. He suggested that democracy was not a solution, but a problem (Wood, 2012). Basically, on a state level, he wanted to elevate decision making to limit democracy which was actually causing more harm than
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how gordon wood calls the new federal constitution a "radical experiment" and believes the framers of that constitution to be political radicals.
- Explains that the new federal constitution was considered a "radical experiment" because it gave the government power.
- Analyzes wood's argument that there were two reform movements that influenced the creation of the constitution.
- Analyzes how gordon wood explains the second reform movement at state level. madison noticed the problem of each of the 134 states having its own agenda and wanted to create a stronger government that would override certain state powers.
- Opines that modern americans still believe in the framer's "radical experiment" but don't believe it as much.
809 wordsRead More