Examples Of The Federalist Paper And Government Today
analytical Essay
1034 words
The Federalist Papers and Government Today In The Federalist Papers by James Madison, Madison discuses various aspects of government and how the government must be organized in order to better represent the people. In The Federalist, No. 10 Madison discusses the nature of political factions and parties and how they can affect the government and its practices. The Federalist, No. 51 discusses instead how the government being in branches helps maintain liberties and better protect the American people. The topics mentioned in The Federalist Papers continue to explain and structure our government today. The Federalist, No.10 explains the nature of factions within the government and how they can harm the implementation of proper policies and …show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how madison's the federalist papers explains various aspects of government and how it must be organized to better represent the people. madison discusses the nature of political factions and parties.
- Analyzes how madison states that a well-constructed union must control and break apart factions that may manipulate or prevent the passing of proper legislature or government controls.
- Analyzes how madison states that latent causes of faction are sown in the nature of man, and that the government must be fit to handle them and keep them from gaining control over legislature.
- Analyzes how madison explains the purpose of having multiple branches of government and how it protects the people.
- Analyzes how madison's federalists papers inspire and explain our government today and how it functions.
- Analyzes how madison's federalist papers have an influence on our government and how it functions today.
Within the document Madison states, "In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty, it is evident that each department should have a will of its own" (Madison, The Federalist, No.52. R83). Through the quote Madison states that the government is split into branches that act as their own separate entities. By having these branches be completely separate from each other, the government can assure freedoms and liberties for the people. Madison explains how having multiple branches protects the people by stating, "It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard the society against the oppression of its rulers, but to guard one part of the society against the injustice of another part" (Madison, The Federalist, No.52. R84). Madison states that by having separate parts of the government, one part can fight against the corruption of another. Having the government be separated into parts can also keep the entire government from being corrupted instead of just a fraction of it. Madison 's paper states that having the government be separated into parts can protect the liberties of the …show more content…
In today 's government political parties are a large part of government operations and how decisions are made in the government. In Madison 's The Federalist, No.10 Madison talked about how factions can control and cause harm to the government. A solution to this control was the use of a republic in order to limit the power of factions and keep them from having complete control. In our government however, factions have become a major part of the government system with political parties having complete control over the different branches of government. The use of this two political party system creates many problems within our government as the two parties fight for control over legislature and control over the government. Despite using a republic system as Madison mentions in his paper, factions continue to control and affect our government today. Madison 's views on government branches also affects our government today. Our government being in branches does help our government from being affected by corruption by each branch being independent from each other. These independent branches help prevent corruption by each branch having independent leadership and control and not being affected by the views of each other. At the same time these branches having unique views and control can lead to problems as the branches of government may not be able to interact properly with
Related
- analytical
- explanatory
- opinion
- Federalist #10analytical essayIn “Federalist #10”, Madison describes the dangerous effects that factions can have on Republican government and on its people. Madison defines a faction as a group of citizens who unite under a shared cause, and work against other groups in order to achieve their means. Their means of achieving their goals may achieve adverse effects upon the rights of other citizens. Put in more modern terms, a faction could be reasonably compared to a special-interest group. The sort of faction that most endangers the liberty inherent in United States society are factions that contain a majority of the whole. The weakness of a popular government is its susceptibility to the effects of factions. However, a well-constructed Union provides numerous advantages, and its ability to break and control factions is its most important and vital to the success of the Union. Factions arise due to the nature of man to be moved by different opinions and passions. Men will be diverse in their opinions as well as their social and economic classes, and just by the mere presence of dividing classes will factions arise. By means of factions, legislative measures are often decided by an overbearing majority, with little or no regard for others who do not share their interests. Protecting against factions will protect those in the minority, and ensure that the public good is served.
In this essay, the author
- Explains madison's definition of a faction, which entails working against other groups to achieve their goals. a well-constructed union provides numerous advantages, and its ability to break and control factions is vital to the success of the union.
- Argues that madison is adamant about the dangers of pure democracy and the negatives it poses when faced by factions.
- Explains that a pure democracy is better-suited to be extended over the "greater sphere of country". madison holds that there are two options in curing the effects of factions.
- Explains that madison proposes that the effects of factions must be controlled, and the best way to do this is to create a large republic.
870 wordsRead More - Federalist #10analytical essayMadison begins perhaps the most famous of the Federalist papers by stating that one of the strongest arguments in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. Madison defines that factions are groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions. Although these factions are at odds with each other, they frequently work against the public interests, and infringe upon the rights of others.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that madison's federalist paper argues that the constitution establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions.
- Explains that both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions.
- Explains that factions are inevitable due to the unequal distribution of property. men of greater ability and talent possess more property than those of lesser ability.
- Explains madison's view that there are only two ways to control a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests.
- Explains that direct democracies cannot control factious conflicts because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against an obnoxious individual or a strong majority.
- Argues that madison hopes that the men elected to office will be wise and good men the best of america. theoretically, those who govern should be the least likely to sacrifice the public good to temporary condition.
- Opines that in large republics, factions will be numerous, but weaker than in small, direct democracies where it is easier to consolidate their strength.
- Explains that the constitution's immediate object is to bring the present thirteen states into a secure union. the states farthest from the center of the country will be most endangered by foreign countries.
- Analyzes how madison concludes that he presents thee previous arguments to convince those who will not listen to those 'prophets of gloom' who say that the proposed government is unworkable.
935 wordsRead More - rawlanalytical essayUltimately, Madison puts forth the most compelling argument in Federalist 10 saying that multiplying the diversity of interests in a large republic is the key to breaking these dangerous majority factions. This can be accomplished by with the aid of separation of powers and checks and balances in government that is established by the Constitution.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how calhoun argues against majority rule, arguing it would lead to a general consensus of all states and the interest of the common good.
- Analyzes madison's argument that multiplying the diversity of interests in a large republic is the key to breaking dangerous majority factions.
- Compares rawls and mill's arguments for liberty grounded in utilitarianism, arguing that it is theoretically possible to override human rights if it serves the greater good.
- Analyzes how rawls's a theory of justice develops a hypothesis for how to deal with political and societal differences and inequalities.
- Explains rawls' principle that each person has an equal right to the most extensive total system of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar system for all.
- Describes rawls' "veil of ignorance" which will help us achieve a more just political and socioeconomically society where resources are more equitably distributed.
- Analyzes how rawls argues that in a just society, disembodied souls would agree to be born into, knowing that they might be dealt lousy social or genetic hand.
- Analyzes how john stuart mill's ideas are based on utilitarianism, the ethical theory claiming that all actions should be directed towards achieving greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.
- Explains that freedom is central to mankind's ability to have freedom from persecution from the law or society. mill talks about the "harm principle" in that as long as we don't harm ourselves and others, we should be able to embrace our diversity.
- Opines that by encouraging open conversation of diverse ideas, we are open to discovering new truths and putting false truth behind us.
- Disagrees with mill's concept of justice because one person could be sacrificed for the greater good of the group. the most just theory is found under the ssocial contract theories.
984 wordsRead More - Pluralismanalytical essayIn Federalist No. 10, James Madison stresses that “measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.” Madison philosophized that a large republic, composed of numerous factions capable of competing with each other and the majority must exist in order to avoid tyranny of majority rule.# When Federalist No. 10 was published, the concept of pluralism was not widely used. However, the political theory that is the foundation for United States government was the influential force behind pluralism and its doctrines.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that many critics believe that faction representation is biased in favor of wealthy corporations and affluent individuals. schattschneider claims that the heavenly chorus sings with an upper-class accent.
- Analyzes how madison and the other founding fathers envisioned a country with political freedom and opportunity for every citizen. they hoped that america would avoid tyranny brought by an overwhelming majority.
- Analyzes how texas republican larry combest criticizes the bush administration for turning down the republican farm bill.
- Explains the concept of pluralism in federalist no. 10, which focuses on shared power among interest groups and competing factions.
- Analyzes how the bush administration felt that not enough money would be spent on the environment. pluralism is a large aspect of the united states' political system.
- Cites becker, elizabeth, evans, graham, hewnham, jeffrey, kernell, samuel, and gary c. jacobson, the logic of american politics.
1378 wordsRead More - Madisonian Model Essayanalytical essayThe Madisonian model, which was first proposed by James Madison, is a structure of government made to prevent either a minority or majority group to build up enough power to dominate the others. The Constitution made this possible. One of the principles was to separate the powers of the government into three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The separation of powers allowed each of the three branches to be independent with the exception of working together in order to govern. Congress passes laws, the president applies and manages the laws, and the courts elucidates the laws in distinct conditions. Madison clarified his beliefs in Federalist Paper No. 51 saying that in order for a government to exist it was necessary for there to be a balance in power. By giving each branch administer constitutional means, they'll avoid intrusions of the others. The constitutional means are a system of checks and balances, where each branch of government has the right to inspect the conduct of the others. Neither branc...
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the madisonian model fails due to the abuse of power, resulting in the domination of one group over another.
- Explains the madisonian model of government, which was first proposed by james madison. the separation of powers allowed each branch to be independent with the exception of working together.
- Explains that the republic and federal system help clarify what the intentions of the government originally were.
- Explains how the supreme court changed the landscape of campaign finance with citizens united, which allowed corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts of money in campaigns.
- Analyzes how madison's model has failed in many situations. one group dominating the other by abusing their powers.
1158 wordsRead More - Similarities Between Madison And The Federalistsexplanatory essayThe ideas that Madison was discussing in his Federalist Paper #10 were that because the character of man, factions are inevitable. He believed a well-created union (government) would collapse and restrain the passion of faction, an unsafe flaw in admired governments. Madison defines factions as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community (Reader of Primary Sources pp. 29)”. In other words, they are crowds of individuals who gather collectively to defend and endorse their special economic concerns and political views.
In this essay, the author
- Explains madison's view that factions are inevitable because of the character of man. he believed a well-created union would collapse and restrain the passion of faction, an unsafe flaw in admired governments.
- Explains that madison believed that factions were unavoidable given the character of men as a whole. he felt there were only two ways to manage them: to remove its causes or to control its effects.
- Explains that pure democracies have been spectacles of turbulence and contention, incompatible with personal security or the rights of property, and violent in their deaths.
- Explains the difficulty of a "pure" democracy was that the new nation was too sizeable in physical area and territory and in inhabitants for the residents to "assemble and administer the government in person."
- Explains how madison rose to the contradictory decision that the more factions, the better.
587 wordsRead More - Essay On Federalismopinion essayOur founding father George Washington once said “The basis of our political system is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitution of government.” When acquiring independence, The U.S wanted to form a source of government that would conciliated all of their citizens but they wanted to do it in a way that would distinguish them from the parliamentary government of the British. As a result, theU.S created a unique structure of government to assure that no one gain power over another, and this set of structure can be identified as Federalism. Federalism according to American Government is “a system in which the legal power of government is divided between a central or national government and smaller units of state government, usually under the authority of a written constitution.”(Volkomer, Pg33) The U.S separation of powers is evident through the judicial, legislative, and representative branch. The power given to each is in theory balanced and checked by the power of the other two. Each branch serves as a check on potential immoderations of the other two. In this essay, I would be differentiating the political system with that of the British, and explaining certain aspects that makeour political system unique. Although our political system has been the core for our country for centuries, I feel is the best representation even though it could be dysfunctional at times.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the u.s created a unique structure of government to ensure that no one gain power over another.
- Explains that the state and local levels receive the most law-making authority because they are guaranteed reserved powers by the constitution. however, certain limitations are set to the states so that they won’t contradict with the federal government.
- Explains that interest groups in the united states emphasize the importance of freedom of speech, press, and assembly.
- Compares the two types of democracy in the united states and the u.k.
- Explains that members of congress are more loyal to their constituents than their parties. they practiced two forms of representation: policy representation and service.
- Opines that the american political system serves the country well because of many reasons, such as cultural, historical, and proportional representation.
1430 wordsRead More - The Federalist Papers is the name for the 85 articles that Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote collectively between the years of 1787 and 1788. These essays or articles were written in an attempt to persuade the people of New York to ratify the new United States Constitution. During the time that these papers were being written, the ambient discussions were heightened by political controversy amongst the people. Some were in favor of founding a new government while others were too compliant with the old ways and were often afraid of the consequences that forming a new government would bring. The Federalist Papers helped to ease some of the tension and aimed to reassure that the old form of government did not frighten, oppress, or undermine the voice of the people. The Federalist Papers guided the ratification of the constitution by constructing some of their biggest and crucial arguments, along with the aspiration that Americans at this time had for a more adequate and effective national government and
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the federalist papers were written to persuade the people of new york to ratify the new united states constitution.
- Analyzes how hamilton, madison, and jay's papers gave the americans the extra confidence and push they needed to achieve their goals of becoming independent.
- Explains that the federalist papers' plan for the new government included the power to provide a safe keeping of the states against external dangers.
- Analyzes how the federalist papers portrays that the rights given to the central government would put a spotlight on the legislative branch of that government.
- Analyzes the issues that were evident before the ratification of the new constitution, such as the poor public credit, the vast amount of debt, and the inability for the nation to defend their right to the mississippi.
- Explains that a weak government could not tax, which made finances difficult to handle with the articles of confederation. the new republic government would allow improvements in the financial gap between rich and poor.
- Explains that the american people were afraid of the occupation of a standing army because of their struggle with britain in the years that led up to american revolution.
- Explains the federalist papers' purpose of government, which is to preserve the union of the thirteen states and allow for other states to join.
- Concludes that the 85-essays succeeded in persuading doubtful new yorkers to ratify the constitution.
1493 wordsRead More - Madison vs. Marshallanalytical essayIn Madison’s work of Federalist No. 10, he identifies factions were a problem. He views them as “a dangerous vice”, but at the same time saw factions as a necessary evil. He mentions that “The regulation of these various and interfering interest forms the principal task of modern legislation; and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of government.” Here Madison states that factions, opposed in spirit to democratic ideals, spreading “unsteadiness and injustice” which are actually necessary for the function of a representative government. Throughout his paper, Madison explains how pure democracy wouldn’t be able to work, because it had “no cure for the mischief of faction.” He believed that this type of government will give so much power to the majority that it was doomed to fail. He sounded very confident that the new constitution would work. He believed of having a representative and a republic system. He had no doubt in mind that new constitution would be the end of the states embarrassment to the world. Madison saw democracy not as an ideal but something that could be modified to be fitted.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that madison and marshall's points of view differed from one another, and that the political landscape was different.
- Analyzes how madison identifies factions as a problem in federalist no. 10. he believes that pure democracy wouldn't work because it had no cure for the mischief of faction.
- Opines that marshall was erroneous by not accepting the constitutional celebration.
640 wordsRead More - Factionalism in Americaanalytical essayIn discussing the problems surrounding the issue of factionalism in American society, James Madison concluded in Federalist #10, "The inference to which we are brought is that the causes of cannot be removed and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its effects." (Federalist Papers 1999, 75) In many ways, the nature of American politics has revolved around this question since our country's birth. What is the relationship between parties and government? Should the party serve as an intermediary between the populace and government, and how should a government respond to disparate ideas espoused by the factions inherent to a free society. This paper will discuss the political evolution that has revolved around this question, examining different "regimes" and how they attempted to reconcile the relationship between power and the corresponding role of the people. Beginning with the Federalists themselves, we will trace this evolution until we reach the contemporary period, where we find a political climate described as "interest-group liberalism." Eventually this paper will seek to determine which has been the most beneficial, and which is ultimately preferable.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the nature of american politics revolves around this question since our country's birth. the paper will examine different "regimes" and how they attempted to reconcile the relationship between power and the corresponding role of the people.
- Explains the federalists' philosophy of a centralized government after the failure of the articles of confederation.
- Explains that the federalists never foresaw that a strict two-party system would develop. they envisioned that members of government would come from different regions, and thus have vastly different interests.
- Explains that even as the federalist system was implemented, a semblance of the first party emerged. thomas jefferson's republican party served as foil to the federalists. john quincy adams was elected president.
- Analyzes how the jacksonian system corrected this, stressing partisanship as a means of motivating and energizing the electorate.
- Analyzes how the progressive party sought to rectify the problem of decentralized government. the us became more connected economically; political connectivity was necessary.
- Analyzes how the progressives gained 27% of the vote in the 1912 election. woodrow wilson's democrats recognized this, and would present a tempered form of progressivism.
- Explains that the wilsonian system was ineffective because of a split between the southern and progressive wings of the democrat party.
- Analyzes how roosevelt's presidency saw a drastic change in the electorate and legislative branches. roosevelt stressed constitutional rights and tried to "localize" the executive branch.
- Analyzes the rise of "interest-group liberalism," a political pattern that gradually developed in response to rooseveltian politics.
- Explains that the federalists sought to temper faction, but did not account for the emergence of political parties. the wilsonians tried to strike a balance between progressivism and jacksonian approaches to democracy.
- Analyzes how the wilsonian system struck the largest balance between centralized and decentralized politics. the wilsonians realized that progressive policy was necessary to the american political climate.
1750 wordsRead More