Should Juveniles Be Allowed To Commit A Crime

995 Words2 Pages

If a teenager committed a crime such as rape, murder, or assault against your child would you want them tried as an adult and sentenced to prison? In most responses the parent would say yes. In today’s world about 10 percent of all homicides are committed by juveniles under the age of 18 (Khan 1). In saying this, juveniles commit viscous crimes in which their time is limited to “rehabilitate” their actions, thus is not true. If a teenager commits a crime and does not suffer from metal distress means they were stable during the time of a crime ensures they need to suffer and learn from their actions by doing jail time. Also, it is unfair to the person who commits the same crime who learns their lesson by spending the rest of their time in prison. Lastly for the safety of …show more content…

Ultimately, teens should be held accountable for their actions. Some feel as if teens are capable of learning from their mistakes and because they are still young they can be rehabilitated (TeenInk 1). Juveniles who have the motive, energy, and capability of killing and or committing any other adulterous crime should spend time in jail and or prison. For example, if a loved one was murdered or killed and their perpetrator was a teen would you want him or her to aces their full time in jail or prison? Most people would answer yes. Although it may seem harsh to some it is done for the best in most circumstances. Rather at the age 13 or 30 if someone is harmed by the hands of other they should be put into a jail or prison for the safety of others surrounding them. Youth who commit crime are criminals and shouldn’t be able to walk the streets freely, live as neighbors, and are capable of committing more crimes (TeenInk 1). “All crimes committed by juveniles should and must be treated in the same regard, it not to punish heinous acts, then to provide justice to the families of victims (TeenInk

Open Document