Pros And Cons Of King Henry Viii

554 Words2 Pages

Henry VIII, a man known throughout history for his multitude of marriages and disregard for women, his separation from the RCC which sparked the beginning of the Reformation, and his favor for public executions. Although his negative actions are what he is most commonly known for, it is not all that defines who Henry VIII was. Henry VIII, King of England from 21 April 1509 to his death, January 28, 1547, was married to six women over his lifetime and he ruled for 37 years. Even though Henry VIII caused some prosperity in England during his rule, that does not make him a good leader. The methods for his progression, whether is be good or bad, as a leader were unethical, immoral and above all in complete ignorance for the wishes of his people. …show more content…

He believed that social, political and economical harmony could occur when only one man had complete power. In his mind, much of the discord and strife happening in Europe could only be solved by one, all powerful leader. To him, and many others who obtain their political beliefs from the Holy Scripture, similar to the Divine Right of Kings, stating that a king's rule is sacred and that the ruler should use their power for the people and not abuse it, and most importantly, put the people’s needs and desires above his own. To summarize, a ruler must use his absolute power for the good of his people, and act only with them in mind. In order for an absolute leader to be considered a good leader, they must possess at the minimum, the three IB learner traits caring, thinker and principled. The reason why it is so crucial for a leader to possess these traits is because being a benevolent, moral and selfless ruler will make the land they live is devoid of fear for internal destruction and unwarranted persecution. King Henry VIII did not use his unobstructed power for good; he abused

Open Document