More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of patient consent
Some essays about patient privacy, security, and confidentiality
Some essays about patient privacy, security, and confidentiality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Personal autonomy refers to the capacity to think, decide and act on one's own free initiative (Patient confidentiality & divulging patient information to third parties, 1996). For a patient’s choice to be an autonomous choice, the patient must make his choice voluntarily (free of controlling constraints), his choice must be adequately informed, and the patient must have decision-making capacity (he must be competent) (Paola, 2010), therefore Physicians and family members should help the patient come to his own decision by providing full information; they should also uphold a competent, adult patient's decision, even if it appears medically wrong (Patient confidentiality & divulging patient information to third parties, 1996).
Beauchamp and Childress (2012) defined autonomy as self-ruled, self governance or self determination. John Peter Smith hospital did not respect the advance wishes of Mrs. Munoz. Although Marlise did not have a formal advance directive Mr. Munoz, her surrogate, continued to advocate her wishes . Mrs. Munoz right to autonomy
According to Terrence F. Ackerman, as of the 1980s the American Medical Association had to include the respect for a person’s autonomy as a principle of medical ethics (Ackerman 14, 1982). This includes having the physician provide all the medical information to the patient even if the information could cause negative implication onto the patient. The physician is also expected to withhold all information of the patient from 3rd parties (Ackerman 14, 1982). Although it is seen as standard in today’s world, in
Autonomy is to consider the clients rights to determine his or her own situation. Professional helpers who administer the client with autonomy must encourage self-reliance and support the client’s independence. For example, Lisa is 20 years old pregnant and is in denial of being addicted to heroin. Lisa arrived at her appointment to see her social worker Janice with her aunt. Before attending the appointment her aunt reported to the social worker that her niece just found out that she is three months pregnant and she is addicted to heroin. The aunt would like for her niece to enter a twelve step program to get clean before having her baby. Janice met with Lisa and her aunt notice and she recognized that Lisa was a little high. She discussed with Lisa of the idea of entering in a twelve program, she became very distraught and hostile. Shouting, “My aunt just want to send me away, she doesn’t love me, and she just want me to get out her house”! Janice explained to Lisa, “It’s up to you and you do what you feel is necessary”. Ms. Janice is here for whatever you
The four major ethical principles in health care are: Autonomy – to honor the patient’s right to make their own decision (the opposite is paternalism - the health care provider knows best for the patient), Beneficence – to help the patient advance his/her own good, Nonmaleficence – to do no harm (many bioethical controversies involves this principle), and Justice – to be fair and treat like cases alike. All 4 principles are considered to be in effect at all times. In theory, each is of equal weight or importance. Ethical responsibilities in a given situation depend in part on the nature of the decision and in part on the roles everyone involved play.
This provides people with control over their health care when they cannot speak for themselves. In other words, a health care directive is a legal document recognized by a legislative body to promote autonomy (The Health Care Directives Act, 1992). Autonomy is described as the quality to function independently (Mosby, 2013). Autonomy is the fundamental concept of health care directives, it allows people to openly express their personal values and beliefs, without judgement of health care decisions, “…autonomous decisions as those made intentionally and with substantial understanding and freedom from controlling influences” (Entwistle, Carter, Cribb, & McCaffery, 2010). When all information is provided, the individual can make an informed decision about their health care and have a right to no influencing factors. The health care directive document provide people the opportunity to consent to or refuse treatment and who will have the authority to make decisions on the individual’s behalf if unconscious, or mental incapacity arise (The Health Care Directives Act, 1992). In order to fully practice autonomy, especially in regards to health care directives, the appropriate mental development is key to comprehending
Autonomy is the person right to be able to decide for themselves (Arnold & Boggs-Underman, 2011). In this case individual are not force to use NEP or stop taking drugs. But, the health care providers seek ways for the drug user to make a healthy decision by using sterile equipment rather than used possibly contaminated equipment (Loue, Lurie & Lloyd, 1995).
Autonomy is identified as another professional value and one that the nurse must possess. Autonomy is the right to self-determination. Nurse’s respect the patient’s right to make a decision regarding their healthcare. Practical application includes, educating patients and their families on their choices, honoring their right to make their own decision and stay in control of their health, developing care plans in collaboration with the patient (Taylor, C. Lillis, C. LeMone, P. Lynn, P,
The aim of the analysis is meant to clarify the meaning of the word autonomy thereby the introduction of a concept. Clarification is needed as the word autonomy does have several meanings and not all apply to medical terminology, some meanings span to philosophy, technology and general decision making. The medical meaning is significant in the care of patients for improved outcomes through choice and educated decision making on the part of the patient. Autonomy can be empowering as a concept or even as a single word.
The principle of autonomy states, that an individual’s decision must be respected in all cases, also an individual can act freely in accordance to their plan. For example, in a case where a patient and family demands to continue medical or surgical care and a physician want the patient to stop further treatment. In this case the patient’s choice will matter the most. According to the principle of autonomy it will be the patients and family choice whether to continue or discontinue treatment. The principle of beneficence which states, “one must promote good” comes into play in this case. In accordance to beneficence the patient will not benefit from the physicians responses personally. He/she will not benefit from harming her body with more surgeries. The patient will be going against the principle non-maleficence, which states that “one must cause no harm to an individual” by causing harm to herself. In this case the physician is justified in his/her actions by discontinuing medical or surgical care to the patient because it will not it her. These principles are what healthcare provider use to help and guide patients with the ...
She would rather choose to be at risk for death than have her legs amputated. No person other than the only particular individual can better know about the best interests for him or her. This is also supported by Bernice Elger when analyzing the case of Monica (Elger, 2000). Also, respect for autonomy has already been taken into account in the modernized version of Hippocratic Oath, “But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty” (Lasagna, 1964). Autonomy empowers an individual the right of making rational decisions when facing medical problems, so does the right to act accordingly to
Autonomy has become the essential principle in western bioethics. A person has the right to their own decision making and to exercise independent action and individual choice after having been fully informed of the treatment options available in western culture if the person is mentally capable gives their informed consent and makes decisions on their behalf. Patient autonomy in Indian culture may not play the same role that it does in the West. In Hinduism, however, family members make decisions, particularly the elder son. Besides, the husband will make arrangements for his wife.
The concept of autonomy in the medical practice brings many different views. Autonomy is the ability individuals have to be self-governing. In these different views there exist two schools of thought, one is the belief that people are born with the ability to do what they want their body and no organization can tell them what to do with their body, like the government. On the other hand, some people believe that it is more complicated and conditional on mental competency so that person can make rational decisions. However, the majority of people seem to advocate for autonomy. A particular largely uncontroversial discussion arises with the case of Dax Cowart, who had his right to autonomy taken from him in a tragic accident and is therefore, an advocate for autonomy. As an ethics committee, we were to discuss this case in accord with four questions: can Dax Cowart refuse treatment, is no, why. If yes, then when could he be released, and if yes to the first question what would your decision be if Cowart asked for physician assisted suicide. I will be discussing the major points, consensus, and the reasons for the consensus from the committee. In addition, I will summarize the case and state my own opinion.
Autonomy (independence and the right of self-determination) is certainly valued in modern society and patients do, and should, have the right to accept or reject medical treatment. However, those who favor assisted suicide claim that autonomy extends to the right of a patient to decide when, where, how and why to die
Patient autonomy is “the right of patients to make decisions about their medical care without their health care provider trying to influence the decision. Patient autonomy does allow for health care providers to educate the patient but does not allow the health care provider to make the decision for the patient” (Patient Autonomy, n.d.). In this case, the conflict to be resolved was “the right of a competent adult to refuse medical treatment and the interest of a physician in preserving life without fear of liability” (Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, 1999). We must remember that Jesus Christ is our head and lawgiver. Our self-rule is to be with Him, with no outside interference in harmony with His laws. A symposium of
In this essay I argue based on the principle of informed consent that physicians always have a duty to get permission from autonomous patients before treatment and that physicians should never lie about the treatment based on a deontological framework through the principles of autonomy and beneficence, no matter how much psychological pain could be caused. The principle of informed consent states that the term “refers to the action of an autonomous, informed person agreeing to submit to medical treatment or experimentation” (Vaughn 180). The two main principles that help justify informed consent would be principles of autonomy