The literature review was described about the history, definition, purpose and the process of performance appraisal system that applied in the organization. Performance appraisal system in an essential tool that used in Human Resource Department to integrate both administrative in decision making as well as the development of employee job performance at workplace. It may give a large impact of employee satisfaction with the appraisal system being practiced in the organization which in turn impacts how the employee feels towards on his or her organization. So, the researcher found that employee is an important role play in this system. This review also defined an employee satisfaction and it’s relation with performance appraisal system in an organization.
The outcome from performance appraisal system will give mutual benefits to the employee and the organization. The researcher was constructing a theoretical framework that describes detail about the dependent variables which is the performance appraisal system that depends on independent variables which is the employee satisfaction. There are three independent variables that need to evaluate is provide training for appraiser, feedback seeking from employees, and motivation and reward system. The researcher assumes that these dependent variables will enhance the employee satisfaction during the evaluation of performance appraisal system towards them in an organization.
2.1 Performance Appraisal System
Performance appraisal was roots in the early of 20th century where it can be outlined during Taylor’s pioneering Time and Motion studies. This system was not very helpful during this period but now it was almost everything in the field of modern human resource management. As a dis...
... middle of paper ...
...praisal. The feedback might give by supervisor is high or low level that reflect their work performance in the organization. High self-esteem of the employee perceived the feedback to be more accurate and their perceptions were influenced by sequence. Apparently, the greater the self-esteem of employee, the more they will avoid or ignores the negative aspects and it might enhance their satisfaction of job performance.
Feedback Seeking
This feedback seeking behaviors is thought to be tied to motivations for achieving competence as well as protecting and enhancing self-esteem of an employee. An individual should accept and desire to respond to feedback is greater when the feedback is actively sought. Perhaps, an employee with a greater propensity for feedback-seeking behavior also has more favorable attitudes about performance appraisal system in the organization.
Feedback is an excellent tool to provide employees with information and guidance. Feedback consists of two-way communication. Employee feedback provides managers with clues regarding how they are hindering or aiding their subordinates ' work performance. Supervisory feedback should inform, enlighten, and suggest improvements to employees regarding their performance. Feedback increases self-awareness. Proverbs 19:20 states “Hear counsel, receive instruction, and accept correction, that you may be wise in the time to come.” If presented correctly, feedback is not positive or negative. It is just data to make someone aware of the impact of his/her skills and behaviors on
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
Tanyaturner (2013) Case 7-1 the Politics of Performance Appraisal Essay [online] available from [24 March 2014]
First type is positive feedback. This type of feedback we all love but too much positive feedback can cause us to become complacent with our work. Receiving this type of feedback is definitely encouraging to a worker and it stands out the most due to the fact of how well it made us feel. The next type is negative feedback, which to us means failure. We do not like how receiving negative feedback feels so we usually do not accept unfavorable information. There is also a tendency for the recipient to try to place blame on another individual, constant explanations as well as only fixing the behavior to avoid it in the future. Doing so may change the individual’s actions but if they have no guidance with it he or she may still not perform at a desired behavior. The last type of feedback is no feedback at all. The article states, that no response feedback at all is detrimental to the employee’s performance in the workplace (Sadri and Seto, 2011). There has to be some type of encouragement or motivation for them. The authors have a good rule to follow with feedback, “Since the purpose of feedback is to motivate and inform, we suggest that the ratio of positive to negative information that an individual receives is very important. Three positives followed by one negative is a good ratio” (Sadri and Seto, 2011, p.
The 360-degree feedback system can be very delicate in nature. A person not well ready for it could be thrown out of balance. It can also generate some new problem in an organisation. It not designed and conducted well, it posses the potential danger of a candidate developing wrong perceptions or notions about one or more of his auditor and creating new perspective towards them. It is therefore, unavoidable and significant to handle the process well and make it foolproof. The first important step is to examine whether the organisation is ready for it or not. The second important step is to examine if the candidate is ready for it. For the purpose of systematic analysis and examination of the problem at hand, the studies by the several researchers have been reviewed. Baron, (2009) examines that managers who received upward feedback about their supervisory behaviour significantly improved their behaviour and improves the subordinate ratings of managerial performance. Similarly, Baron, (2009) found that employees were favourably disposed toward associate rating. The feedback is positively related with fulfilment with prior peer ratings and negatively associated with perceived friendship bias and years of company experience. Subordinates’ ratings of leadership were significantly higher following feedback from subordinates under which a highly structured session is there where leaders discussed the feedback results with subordinates (Baron, 2009).
Section 1: The focus of many managers is most often on the wrong things. They focus on appraisal rather than planning. Performance appraisal is not performance management. Managers often focus on a one-way flow of words (manager to employee) rather than dialogue. Performance management and the end of the year appraisal are often seen as a necessary evil. They don’t realize that if carried out properly, performance management has the potential to fix many of the problems they’re facing.
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
In this paper I critically reflect on five different self-assessments: locus of control (LOC), emotional intelligence (EI), listening self-inventory, team member type and conflict management. Throughout my discussion, I focus on their correlations and apply the gathered information to my work-life experiences. I will also provide a systematic assessment of each of these questionnaires. This evaluation will address any possible weaknesses I had found within the tests and prepare my final conclusions based upon those final educated results.
The 360-degree feedback or multi sources feedback is assessment, which comes from other employees. This feedback contains direct and indirect information from managers, colleagues, subordinates as well as self-evaluation data. Also, it includes other external sources such as customers and suppliers reports. The 360-degree feedback plays a significant role to help workers develop their performance. Human resources professionals are increasingly using this assessment. The main propose of the 360 feedback is to encourage employees to seek out information about their performance, skills and working relations. The origin of 360-feedback came from the German military during World War II. They started using multiple sources in order to evaluate officer’s performance (Thornton, 2014). In this paper, I am going to explore some key principles and actions that can help a manager increase their 360-degree feedback ratings. The paper will identify manager perspective of job performance, environmental factors influencing employee review of managers, and perspective of customers and suppliers satisfaction. Also, actions will be suggested for affective applications of the principles.
The manager communicates with the members of staff individually on a regular basis providing all the necessary information about the employee’s overall performance as it relates to their roles in the workplace. This performance appraisal is beneficial to employees as it allows them to create an outline for their goals with the greatest effort it should not be used to lower the employee’s level of motivation but seek to increase it.
Performance management: changing behavior that drives organizational effectiveness (4th ed.). Atlanta, GA: Performance Management Publications. Larry L. Axline., (1996). The ethics of performance appraisal.
Organization is a group of people brought to gather to achieve specific goals. Goals can be achieved if team member are performing well. Performance is the results of activities given to the employees in an organization to be achieved within specific period of time. Evaluating the current performance of employees against past performances and organizational standards is known as Performance Appraisal (Dessler, 2005). Furthermore performance appraisal helps the company know how individual employees are performing and how to improve their performance thus improving the performance of the company (Grubb, 2007). A performance appraisal is propose in which the performance management system in an organizations set work goals, determine performance standards, provide performance feedback, determine training and development needs and distribute rewards as well as evaluating an employee’s job performance during a period of time. The performance of team member is much more than appraising individuals’ works, it is managing the business, so the performance of an employee is influences by the performance of an organization. It is target to achieve the best results for the planned strategic by managing activities of employees. There are many different opinions on the performance appraisals, some organizations do performance appraisals without any aim just follow others., where some organizations do performance appraisals to make sure they have a record of a piece of paper in the employee’s file – they are careless about do corrective action. But successful organizations understand the importance of combining performance appraisals into their performance management process and strategy plan as the success of any organizatio...
Although performance is a major objective at top organizations, successfully addressing poor performance is also a key focus. Although many employees feel or dread performance appraisals they are directed to enforce clarity with individual employees day-to-day work-load, performance appraisals develops responsibility while making employees accountable for performance expectations, reinforces future career planning, helps the organization with determining training needs, and provides a stem of documentation for legality purposes. Performance management in detail is much broader than many employers, and employees assume and necessitates so much more. Proficient appraisals should represent a summary of on-going dialogue. Focusing only on an annual performance evaluation leads to misrepresentation of the performance management process in its
The performance method can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of employee at work through performance appraisals
Banner, D. K., Graber, J. M. (1985). Critical issues in performances appraisal. Journal of Management Development. Issue 4. Pp. 27-35.