Industrial Relations Case Study

1813 Words4 Pages

Different EU industrial relations system impact on MNCs differently; this would affect the decision made by China to relocate their company. The Chinese industrial relations started off with a Marxist view set by Mao Zedong (1949-1979). This meant that lands and businesses were nationalised and run by collectives. In this type of system there were and are no ‘free’ trade unions. The Communist party created one union whose role is described as a ‘transmission belt’ for party and enterprise management, not collective bargaining on behalf of workers. If the Chinese company decided to move to the UK then there will be radical changes made to the way the company could be run.
UK is classified as an Anglo Saxon industrial relations system. This means that the UK has not yet embraced corporatism but adopted collective bargaining between employers and employees towards industrial relations. This kind of system is described as ‘pluralistic fragmentation’ (Goldthorpe,1984).
An advantage of locating in an Anglo-Saxon industrial relations system is that it allows job mobility and has free market (Needle,2004). This means that there is little to none intervention by the government in reference to supply and demand in the market. Job mobility enables workers to benefit from transferable skills and move from one organisation to another.
However Anglo-Saxon systems has weak trade union power (Needle,2004). In UK; this is very true as the decrease of union influence was seen from 1970s when Margaret Thatcher came into power. With a weak trade union power it means that there will be industrial relations unrest.
But there is an emphasis on managerial autonomy (Needle,2004); this gives managing bodies greater autonomy to respond to a dynamic com...

... middle of paper ...

...increasing. Sweden’s steel market is profitable but due to Norway’s oil export; most investments are taken by Norway. If the Chinese steel MNC chooses to locate in UK then it will benefit from return on investments through employment level.

Looking at the arguments put in place between UK and Sweden, it is evident that the Chinese MNC should choose to locate in the UK. This is because UK offers a free market, protective private rights and a growing steel industry. The steel market in Sweden is still slow and there is a strong competition which Sweden may succumb to. It is essential that the economical forecast of the nation is positive. Looking at the stable financial grounds of UK; it seems to be the best fit for the MNC. The GDP growth rate for March 2014 is 2.8%; the new unemployment rate has decreased to 6.6% and inflation rate to be 2.9% (HM Treasury,2014).

Open Document