Essay On Tyranny In Government

611 Words2 Pages

Fortunately our forefathers were not subsumed into mindless robotic obeisance, but understood the people’s rights. After being subjected to British tyranny, they were especially interested in having an individual citizenry well-armed enough to be able to take on whatever government might be in power. Thomas Jefferson appropriately stated, “When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”1
On May 9, 1792, Congress passed the Uniform Militia Act (1 Stat. 264) which remained the basic militia law until the twentieth century; in as much, …show more content…

In the 1st Amendment the first five words, “Congress shall make no law, essentially removes everything that follows from the field of federal jurisdiction. Our founders intended that freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition were to be left to the states and were not to be prevented, molested, or controlled by the federal government in any way. Over the past eight years the federal government has been a bully pulpit denying Christians & Jews their religious rights in policy and deed.4 For example, endangering women and children by subjecting them to the LGBT restroom laws with the federal government suing North Carolina for taking a stand.5 Assembly of the far left is no longer peaceful protests, but has declined into vulgarity (women dressed as labia’s), assault, and unlawful rioting. In regard to the 2nd Amendment, the far left used every device possible to establish gun regulation and registration, which is the first stage of disarming the populace.6 The first two clauses of the Second Amendment: (1) a militia, and (2) the people, cannot be divorced or elucidated individually, since one does not exist without the other. Bearing arms for individual protection was an unequivocal, God-given right in the minds of the Founding Fathers; ergo, just as it is in the minds of those who interpret the Constitution and Bill of Rights as our founders

Open Document