Differences Between Rome And Macedon

1193 Words3 Pages

Expansion is a significant element of most ancient cultures. However, not many reach the expansion magnitude of either Alexander the Great of Macedon or Rome. Both cultures are known for some of histories most breath taking expeditions of their times. Though the journey may have been troubling for these societies, both cultures brought great honor and wealth home in their own distinctive ways. While both the culture of Rome and Macedon during the time of Alexander the Great have quite a large number of differences in their dreams of expansion and how to maintain the home front while the soldiers are away, the similarities they share of scare tactics and how to handle their Greek neighbors are undeniable. In broad terms, both Rome and Macedon …show more content…

In fact, with many key concepts, they were much more similar than some people would think. One of the most successful tactics of war that they share is the fear tactic, which usually involved violent means for execution. Alexander the Great was especially known for these. While he could have his moments of compassion, such as when he spared the lives of Darius’ family after the once noble king fled from battle (Martin, Ancient Greece, 246), he also had his vindictive side. This was especially true for those who opposed him, such as the city of Tyre. While Alexander was trekking through the Persian lands, Tyre refused to surrender to him. In turn, the King of Macedon burnt the city to the ground for its disobedient and disrespect (Martin, Ancient Greece, 246). This sent a strong message for his opponents, and it carried volumes. This is extremely similar to what the Romans did in respects to the Greeks. When the Greeks showed resistance to following the Roman’s rule, they burnt the rich city of Corinth to the ground to send a message of what would happen to those who did not follow their law (Martin, Ancient Rome, 78). Their path of destruction did not end there either. They followed this one up by mowing over their rivals, the Carthaginians, after the Third Punic Wars (Martin, Ancient Rome, 78). As a result of both of these culture’s merciless tactics, they were able …show more content…

Both of these empires were able to conquer vast lands to enrich their cities and bring glory to their name. In doing so they managed to make many rivals, but against all odds they showed the world just how clever and dangerous they truly are. By this account, even though these countries share some similarities, this does not diminish the impact these cultures had on the times they were alive. They ruled with the strong hand of a right king, and though these tactics might seem merciless to some, it is the way to rule a land

Open Document