Dbq Essay On Abortion

At the 1994 United Nations Population and Development Conference, several major societies were pro-life in regards to abortion, such as in Iranian, United Arab Emirates, and Vatican societies, whereas others felt that abortion should be a choice, like Norwegian and Syrian Arab societies as well as the United Nations as a whole. First, several major societies were pro-life in regards to abortion. Document 2 discusses the beliefs of Iranian Minister Hossain Malekafzali. It states that instead of abortion, families should take advantage of education. In addition, it states the importance and necessity of the family unit in society, which would be affected by this family planning tool. In Document 3, the beliefs of a United Arab Emirates representative

Document 1 shows the opinion of the Norwegian Prime Minister. His beliefs portray that, while religion and morality play a role in family-planning services, “morality becomes hypocrisy if it means accepting mothers’ suffering or dying in connection with unwanted pregnancies and illegal abortions, and unwanted children living in mistery.” He feels that women should be educated and that without this education population growth will become a more prominent issue. Document 5, a statement by the representative of the Syrian Arab Republic, also shows the belief that abortion should be a choice. Ultimately, it states that the enhancement of prosperity in societies, through family planning, is still in accordance with ethical and religious ideals. Document 6, a full U.N. Report, also shows the idea of abortion as a choice. It states that, “the aim of family-planning programmes must be to enable couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number and spacing of their children and to have the information and means to do so.” Despite the fact that this family planning has led to a decrease in fertility rates, these services are still allowed, and barriers are even