Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should college athletes be paid
Essays on whether college athletes should be paid
Should college athletes be paid? not
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should college athletes be paid
Is College Athlete receiving payment important for Student Athlete to get through college. Or is this whole topic irrelevant because College Athletes are already on a scholarship? This topic is important because it gives Student Athletes a chance to get extra money for their personal needs. Also this topic is very controversial to our society today and has been making a lot of commotion for College Athlete for years. One Side believes College Athletes should not receive payment for playing a sport because many people think that they’re already on a scholarship so they’re are being paid through that scholarship. Also being a College Athlete is not a job it’s a privilege because of the free education. Another side believe that College Athlete …show more content…
Many athlete have their personal need that they need money for to help them get through college. This is mainly for the women athlete because they have many personal issue that involve their body. My first quote states “Huma says that Edwards gave an interview to a radio program and mentioned that he sometimes couldn't afford to buy all the food he needed to maintain his playing weight”. ("The college-athlete pay case that nearly didn't happen."( (parag.33). This quote show how many football player need to maintain or gain a certain weight to remain on the team or in their position. Not only football player but many other sport player need a certain amount of food to keep their weight or nutrition. My second quote states “His story of struggling financially a decade after leaving school was the essence of what the plaintiffs were fighting for in court”. ( "The college-athlete pay case that nearly didn't happen.") (parag.66). This quote shows how even after their college living they leave with nothing and end up in debt because they did not have any help. Also they can learn how to save money to become successful in the future. My third quote states quote “When players go straight from college to making millions of dollars, the do not have the know how to manage it correctly.”(7 Most Notable Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes). This quote show how we still have personal problem …show more content…
In this generation NCAA turned into one of the most successful business in the world. All because of the College Athlete the NCAA is is making billions, so why can’t the college athlete get paid a little of money they are making. My first quote states “College football and men's basketball generate revenues of more than $6 billion every year. Yet not one penny goes toward paying the people who make the sports possible: the student athletes.” (Pay to play: should college athletes be paid?(parag. 5). This quote provided how Just 2 sport make about 6 billion dollars a year which will help many of the athlete if they give back. Also show how much value these player are to the NCAA. My second quote states “it is only reasonable that student athletes have a share in the millions of dollars that their sports businesses bring in.”(Pay to play: should college athletes be paid?(parag. 4). This quote proves that the NCAA is kind of hoarding their money from the student. which can help them in a long run. My third quote states “O'Bannon was sitting at a friend's house watching himself in a video game when the wheels began to turn: Why, he wondered, is my image being used years after I'm out of college to make money for someone else?” ("The college-athlete pay case that nearly didn't happen.") ( parag. 6). This quote provided an evidence to support my argument. Today athlete are still
They do not face problems of debt and tuition to the extent that the normal college student faces. Student-athletes are fairly compensated through publicity and financial benefits, and the NCAA should continue to refrain from paying them. The varying size and interest levels of universities makes it almost impossible to fairly pay all athletes. In order to avoid problems like those exhibited by Northwestern’s football team, who recently tried to unionize, all athletes would need to be paid equally. The excitement brought on by college sports is immense, and problems created due to paying athletes would only hurt the tradition and charisma that college athletics offer. In conclusion, College athletes are students and amateurs, not employees. “Remember student comes first in student-athlete”
Some feel that by not paying college athletes that college institutions are thereby exploiting their athletes free of charge, which is unfair. However, this article feels that college athletes are paid very favorably by the large amount of money they receive for schooling through scholarships. Also, since college athletes don’t pay to play or go to school they are receiving a free college degree whether or not they decide to stay in school for four years or not. With the training that they receive from professional trainers and nutritionists for a professional controlled diet they save possibly thousands within the 4 years they attend school and perform in collegiate athletics.
These professors argue that student athletes, under common law and NLRB’s (National Labor Relations Board) employee criterion, do in fact fall under the classification of an employee (Cooper). Under common law, four tests determine if someone is an employee or not. Three of these rules are as follows: “(1) the right of others to control a person's activities; (2) whether that person is compensated; and (3) if that person is economically dependent on that compensation.” According to these guidelines the employer-employee relationship is plainly synonymous to that of coaches and student-athletes. For one, coaches have a significant amount of control over their student-athletes’ activities, two, athletic scholarship money is considered compensation, and third, student-athletes are highly dependent on these scholarships for their food, living, and education. Even after realizing that a student-athlete falls under what the law defines as an employee, we can agree that any D1 student-athlete who works upwards of 40 hours a week to perform at a high level of competition for the universities benefit is essentially working a full time job on top of school work
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote is regarding a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact that college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid to play for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income they bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Many sports people say that if the NCAA pays the athletes to play, it will encourage them to stay in school longer. The money that the athletes will receive at the next level will be bigger than any amount the NCAA can afford to pay them. Athletes argue that the NCAA and ESPN are making billions of dollars off of them to air their games; why can’t they get compensation for it. This argument is valid, but no matter what amount, free education is far more valuable than any financial amount. You’re talking about giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to
Yes, college athletes with scholarship money are still in need of money to have in their pockets: they need personal money for gas, food, clothing, and other things that a college student may need. Paying these athletes may lessen the stress they have dealing with a job during the off-season. Unlike a student going to college with an academic scholarship, a college athlete on an athletic scholarship does not have the time for a job with workouts, classes, practice, and study time that is required. But if you compare a student athlete to just a regular student, the athlete still receives many benefits. Several of the Division I college athletes are always being looked at by their respective professional leagues. There are not re...
One of the strongest arguments against student athletes getting paid is that many people feel they already are getting paid, through their financial aid package. Sports Illustrated author, Seth Davis, states in his article “Hoop Thoughts”, that “student athletes are already being payed by earning a free tuition. Which over the course of four years can exceed $200,000, depending on the school they attend. They are also provided with housing, textbooks, food and academic tutoring. When they travel to road games, they are given per diems for meals. They also get coaching, training, game experience and media exposure in their respective crafts” (Davis, 2011). This is a considerable amount of income. While the majority of regular students are walking out of school with a sizeable amount of debt, most student athletes are debt free. Plus they get to enjoy other benefits that are not made available to the average student. They get to travel with their teams, t...
College athletes may not receive pay based on their performance, or be entitled to sell their own merchandise, but they are heavily relieved with financial aid. When Posnanski says, “It (money generated from football and basketball) should pay to give opportunities to gifted young swimmers, dedicated runners, hard-working volleyball players, and so on.” (588) he displays the idea that using the money from big-time college sports to give scholarships to people who play other sports and endure the same hardships of paying tuition is a better idea than simply paying the players. College athletes are receiving more from the school that they would not need pay from boosters or the college board. Student athletes get top of the line coaching, free tuition, free transportation, free meals, aside from getting a college level education while
A question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for their individual universities, colleges need to financially compensate players for their contributions. The colleges that these superstars represent are reaping all of the benefits of the accomplishments the athletes have, yet the big named players are making nothing from what they do.
Some people say that college athletes get paid by having a scholarship, but if you look at it a different way, scholarships might change your mind. Coaches try to get players who they think have the talent to make them win and to persuade them to come to their school by offering them scholarships. The whole idea behind a scholarship is to lure the athlete into coming to your school. Scholarships are nothing more than a recruitment tactic. They will give you a scholarship as long as you produce for them. It’s all about what you can do for them. Indeed these scholarships pay for tuition, room and board, and books, but these athletes don’t have money for other necessities. The NCAA doesn’t want friends or boosters to offer athletes jobs because they ...
Student athletes get the opportunity to play the game that they love, while getting free or close to free education. If colleges were to pay college athletes the purity and passion of the game would be lossed. “...would turn them into employees,” (Williams 23) athletes would have the mindset that they are getting paid
In our world today, there are many things that are very controversial and debatable. One major thing that is very controversial is in college sports. Should college athletes get paid or not? College athletes should not get paid because only division one football and basketball generate big revenue, the pros are for making the money, and college athletes already receive benefits.
The NCAA does not pay college football athletes salary already and they should keep it that way. One reason college athletes play is to be recognized by NFL scouts because it is their dream to play professionally. They have risks playing football like injury and many other things, so some people say that the players should be paid salary so they have money to help with living, injury, etc. Some people will argue that they have the opportunity to make to the NFL and they also receive other things from the NCAA, so they should not be paid a salary. Overall the college athletes should not be paid salary to play college football because they receive financial living assistance, they receive free/or assisted pay for education to represent their
Within college athletics, there has been controversy over if these athletes should be paid or not. These athletes have worked at their craft for their entire life and should they be awarded by playing this sport with amounts of money because they are good at it? College athletes should not be paid because college athletics are not professional, they are for the betterment of the athletes throughout sports as well through their furtherment in education. College athletics have been apart of the college education for the longest time. Certain colleges have been paying their players with bonuses or straight up money for their athletic ability.
Experts have said that most ‘regular’ students wouldn’t want to be a student athlete “if they knew everything that it entailed”, such as long days, busy schedules, no free time (Newton) (Pattern 4). However, even though they are students first, athletes second, that doesn’t mean that being an athlete is their job. Other college students can be paid for their work, so athletes should be paid for their work as well. Other people may say that college athletes shouldn’t be paid since they are getting a free education through scholarships.