Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

501 Words2 Pages

College Athletes Should Not Be Paid
College athletes should not be paid from an economic standpoint. The college they attend to will provide much more for the athletes than giving them pay would, not only would it be extravagant but it would take away money from other sports that the college offers. In scholarships for student athletes, the college provides financial compensation in almost all aspects of college life, which will take away much of the student debts that accumulate, paying to further their education. Joe Posnanski, a sports journalist, argued that college athletes should not be paid. He discusses how college athletes really are paid in the form of free tuition, free board, free doctors, free places to train, free food, and top of the line coaching. Jared Welch and Blake Marshall, write for the student newspaper of the University of Utah. They argue the 2 different sides on whether college athletes should be paid. College athletes should not be …show more content…

College athletes may not receive pay based on their performance, or be entitled to sell their own merchandise, but they are heavily relieved with financial aid. When Posnanski says, “It (money generated from football and basketball) should pay to give opportunities to gifted young swimmers, dedicated runners, hard-working volleyball players, and so on.” (588) he displays the idea that using the money from big-time college sports to give scholarships to people who play other sports and endure the same hardships of paying tuition is a better idea than simply paying the players. College athletes are receiving more from the school that they would not need pay from boosters or the college board. Student athletes get top of the line coaching, free tuition, free transportation, free meals, aside from getting a college level education while

Open Document