Annotated Bibliography: Should College Athletes Be Paid?
analytical Essay
705 words
Kyle Rojem Annotated Bibliography Should College Athletes Be Paid Van Rheenen, Derek. "Exploitation in College Sports: Race, Revenue, and Educational Reward." International Review for the Sociology of Sport 48.5 (2013): 550-71. Print. Some feel that by not paying college athletes that college institutions are thereby exploiting their athletes free of charge, which is unfair. However, this article feels that college athletes are paid very favorably by the large amount of money they receive for schooling through scholarships. Also, since college athletes don’t pay to play or go to school they are receiving a free college degree whether or not they decide to stay in school for four years or not. With the training that they receive from professional trainers and nutritionists for a professional controlled diet they save possibly thousands within the 4 years they attend school and perform in collegiate athletics. This article is helpful because it is giving you examples of what college athletes at the NCAA level are given just by playing college athletics. Torr, James D. Sports and Athletes: Opposing Viewpoints. Detroit: Greenhaven, 2005. Print. Those who play popular and highly competitive college sports are treated unfairly. The colleges and universities with successful sports like football and basketball receive millions of dollars in television and ad space revenues, so do the National Collegiate Athletic Association, which is the governing body of big time college sports. Many coaches are also paid over $1 million per year. Meanwhile, the players that help the colleges receive these millions of dollars are forbidden to receive any gifts or money for their athletic achievements and performances. As a solution college athletes ... ... middle of paper ... ...letes: The Debate over the Pay for Play Model: A Counterpoint." Journal of Law & Education 31.3 (2002): 293-303. Print. Critics feel that the term amateurism is only a term used in collegiate sports to show the distinguish the difference between professional and collegiate so that they don’t have to pay college athletes. College athletes are just as talented and just as exposed as professional athletes. The argument is for there to be a share in the profits for wage compensation amongst players is know as pay-for-play. College athletics is a corporate enterprise that is worth millions of dollars in revenue. Pay-for-play is an assumption that colleges and universities receive huge revenues from marketing their collegiate sports programs and that the profits from these revenues are not shared with players who perform in the arena. Which some feel that they should.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that college athletes are paid favorably by the large amount of money they receive for schooling through scholarships.
- Argues that college athletes should be paid due to the amount of revenue they generate through their sport. the ncaa claims to be an amateur association and yet it is a multibillion-dollar industry.
- Analyzes how college students' perceptions on the payment of intercollegiate student-athletes differ from players receiving money. the university of texas renovated their football stadium and planned to raise $3 million dollars per season.
- Explains haden, christopher w., "foul! the exploitation of the student-athlete: students deserve compensation for their play in the college athletic arena."
- Explains that the ncaa is a multibillion dollar industry and that college athletes should be paid for their performances.
- Analyzes beckham, joseph c., and michael j. mondello. "workers' compensation and collegiate athletes: the debate over the pay for play model: a counterpoint."
- Argues that amateurism is only a term used in collegiate sports to distinguish the difference between professional and college athletes. pay-for-play is an assumption that colleges and universities receive huge revenues from marketing their sports programs and that the profits are not shared with players.
Let Our AI Magic Supercharge Your Grades!
Related
- analytical
- opinion
- Should College Athletes be Paid?analytical essayOver the past century college athletics have grown more popular than most professional sports. Most of its popularity is due to a large student body in addition to its Alumni, but nonetheless it has surpassed professional sports from its monetary success to its fan support. College athletics are also a very important commodity to Universities around the nation. Next to student's tuition, that's where the majority of the money comes from. No one is more responsible for bringing in that money more than the coach and his/her players. In this notion, one would think that such important people should be paid for a job well done. But this isn't the case. Over the years a question has emerged, should college athletes be paid? After all, college athletics is a job. Some coaches make more than professional coaches. Why shouldn't the players have a chance to do the same? In the article entitled, "Show them the Money", Mark Martinez argues why college athletes should be paid.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that college athletes should be paid for a job well done. some coaches make more than professional coaches.
- Explains that martinez's point of view is simple: college athletes should be paid for their work. he supports his argument by supplying information from important figures the sports world may know.
- Analyzes how martinez uses the "amateurism" argument from the ncaa to explain why college officials would not allow college athletes to be paid.
- Analyzes how martinez uses opponent's views to help support his argument, stating that opponents of the play for play idea say that college-athletes should not be paid because scholarships are already being paid.
- Analyzes how martinez uses actual people and guidelines in his article to validate his argument. he uses steve spurrier as an example.
- Explains that college coaches make more than enough money, such as tubby smith, former university of dayton basketball coach, and ncaa enforced rules that wouldn't let student-athletes on full scholarships to work.
- Analyzes how martinez's article helps aid his argument on why college athletes should be paid. martinez does a good job at attempting to reach the general public.
- Analyzes how martinez presents this argument efficiently and effectively. though his attempts to draw the reader's attention through logic and reason were exceptionally well, his greatest strength was through emotions and values.
706 wordsRead More - College Athletes Should Be Paidopinion essayCollege athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. It’s simple: bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the university’s revenue, apparel sales, and lack of spending money.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that college athletics is a billion dollar industry and that bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money.
- Opines that college sports should be considered a profession and that athletes deserve to be paid for their work.
- Explains that the ncaa regulations state that an athlete loses eligibility if they are paid to play, sign a contract with an agent, receive salary, incentive payment, award, gratuity educational expenses or allowances, or play on professional teams.
- Explains that college athletes get paid by having a scholarship, but if you look at it differently, scholarships might change your mind. the ncaa doesn't want friends or boosters to offer athletes jobs because they fear it will interfere with their sport.
- Explains that the grant-in-aid system has been around since 1956, and the ncaa is using college players as a means to make money-bottom line.
- Compares college football to a business, where the owner, management, and workers make the business work, but the athletes receive no money from their hard work.
- Analyzes how iowa state basketball coach larry eustachy suggests that paying athletes should be explored and would even contribute money out of his own salary to do it.
- Opines that college athletes should get paid for their hard work and dedication. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities.
1602 wordsRead More - College Sports Persuasive Essayanalytical essayThe huge amount of money being made off college sports has led some to question whether student-athletes can be considered amateurs any longer, and whether they should, instead, be paid for their efforts, the argument can be made that the opportunity to both receive an education and get the exposure to win a major professional contract more than compensates NCAA athletes for their
In this essay, the author
- Explains that football is the most viewed sport in the united states. the national football league makes over 500 million for a regular season and their players get paid an average of 2.11 million.
- Explains that college football is regulated by the national collegiate athletic association (ncaa), which has over 40 million viewers in the united states. the ncaa's players practice and play with the same standards and effort as a professional nfl player.
- Argues that college football players aren't paid because they're amateurs, not professionals, student-athletes or employees, which is how colleges get away with paying them nothing.
- Argues that the opportunity to both receive an education and get exposure to win a major professional contract more than compensates ncaa athletes for their efforts.
380 wordsRead More - College Athletesopinion essayWhile the country is split in weather or not to pay college athletes, they should not be paid. College athletes arrive on a scholarship that pays there way through college. They have very little expenses they have to pay for. College sports have always been amateur because the real reason athletes play sports is because of their true love for the game. Overall, nothing can compare to being able to say I played a sport in college, and weather or not they got paid they will remember it for a lifetime.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that college athletes drive college popularity and nationalism. scholarships pay for tuition, room and board, and meal plans.
- Explains that college athletes perform in front of paying crowds and the money they pay to watch goes to the college. the athletic department has many options with what they can do with money, such as putting it into the scholarship fund or buying new equipment.
- Argues that college athletes should not be paid due to unequal opportunity. if a college were to unfairly pay athletes, they would be violating title ix.
- Argues that college sports are the closest thing to amateurism. the ncaa must remain strictly amateur. athletes should be playing the sport because they love it and have a passion for it.
- Opines that while some people don't want athletes paid, others do. they claim that athletes have no other means to compensate for this need since sport practices take up all of their time after their academic responsibilities.
- Opines that while the country is split in weather or not to pay college athletes, they should not be paid. college athletes arrive on a scholarship that pays their way through college.
739 wordsRead More - College Athletes: Should College Athletes Be Paid?opinion essayIn today’s world, college athletes may not play a sport for “the love of the game” instead; they may play with the hopes of making it as a professional athlete. While “the love of the game” feeling may have gotten an athlete to a Division I school to play and the chance to display their talent; at the Division I level, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) see sports strictly as a business. Over the past few months, college athletes have started to come forward claiming that they feel they should be rewarded for being one of the main sources of profit for their university. Many people believe that college athletes should not be paid due to the fact they are receiving a free education; however, college athletes may have expenses that their scholarships or grants may not cover, and being paid for what they are good at may help them cover the differences.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college athletes may not play a sport for "the love of the game" instead, but the national collegiate athletic association (ncaa) see sports strictly as business.
- Opines that college athletes should be able to receive compensation for their talent because it would decrease media scandals that are brought to the public.
- Explains that college athletes should receive money because the ncaa is using the athletes talent to make a large profit.
- Opines that college athletes should be compensated if they suffer any type of injury while playing at their university, which often leaves the athlete with a large bill after their injury.
- Opines that college athletes should not be paid because they are already receiving money to attend school. however, if coaches had a generous pay reduction, the ncaa wouldn't have to dig so deep.
- Concludes that there is no quick fix in determining whether a college athlete should be paid to play.
- Explains that paying college athletes isn't just fair to players; it could improve college basketball. edelman, marc. "21 reasons why student-athletes are employees and should be allowed to unionize."
1176 wordsRead More - Paying the Players: College Athleticsanalytical essayCollege athletics are a source of entertainment for sports fans all over America, especially during football and basketball season. Watching college football on Saturdays during football season is an every weekend tradition in many households throughout the United States. Every February college basketball fans fill out their March Madness brackets and try to pick the winner of every game in the sixty-eight team tournament. College sports have not always been as polarizing as they are today though. When collegiate sports first started students were the coaches and managers of teams. As sporting events started making more money, teams started feeling more pressure to win, and with this came the need for a more experienced individual to coach and manage teams. This eventually evolved into colleges hiring coaches as school employees to train and coach the schools team. As college sports started making more money and becoming more popular the National College Athletic Association, NCAA, was formed to make rules and regulate college sporting events. Schools also started offering athletes athletic scholarships, players would come play a sport for a college, and in return their college would be payed for. It is not that simple anymore though. The NCAA and colleges benefit greatly from the sporting events student-athletes participate in today. Many people don’t think that college athletes should be compensated because their college is paid for; however, colleges exploit athletes for their talents and use them to make millions for the school and everyone involved in the athletics program while the athletes are struggling to get by because they can’t work, they can’t receive help, and they have to try to keep ...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college athletics are a source of entertainment for sports fans all over america, especially during football and basketball season.
- Explains that college sports bring in big bucks to the ncaa, colleges, and coaches, while players receive none of it. the revenue some schools make off of their football program alone is ridiculous.
- Explains that college head coaches make a lot of money and receive many benefits, especially when their team is doing well. while coaches are important, they are not the ones that play in the games.
- Explains that the sec, a premier conference in college athletics, is taking full advantage of fans wanting to watch their favorite teams and teams play the most competitive and entertaining games.
- Explains that being a college student-athlete is tough, but they also get put in many rough spots. athletes don't have time to work.
- Explains that college athletes are supposed to be students first and athletes second, but this is not the case most of the time.
- Explains that many people do not believe that college athletes should be paid. they argue that they get their college paid for, but many athletes don't graduate.
- Explains that 85 percent of college athletes live below the poverty line, so how is it possible to say no to paying them when universities, the ncaa, and college coaches profit from college athletics.
- Explains bender, david, and leone, bruno, sports in america opposing viewpoints, san diego, greenhaven press, 1994.
- Analyzes berkowitz, steve, “contract perks big deal for some football coaches.” usa today.
- Analyzes edelman, marc, and mitchell, horace, “ should college student-athletes be paid?” u.s. news digital weekly, 2013.
- Opines that the sec network will launch in august 2014 bringing more money, exposure to league’s teams.
- Opines that athletes should share in their school’s profits. kiplinger's personal finance 66.3: 11. mas ultra-school edition.
- Analyzes rosenberg, michael, and middle search plus' "workers' comp." sports illustrated 120.14 (2014):64.
1946 wordsRead More - Paying College Athletesanalytical essayIn recent years, the argument about whether or not to pay athletes playing at the college level has become a matter of national debate. Currently, the ruling is that college athletes cannot be paid. This is a stance that should be maintained. Paying athletes to compete at the collegiate level is unfeasible because it would cost colleges too much, influence student’s educational decisions and create an unfair financial atmosphere between athletes and non-athletes.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that paying college athletes to compete at the collegiate level is unfeasible because it would cost colleges too much, influence student’s educational decisions and create an unfair financial atmosphere between athletes and non-athletes.
- Explains that paying college athletes is a bad idea because of the cost associated with it. according to jim walker, these massive costs may cause colleges to close less profitable activities like tennis or golf to save money for the big, money-making sports.
- Opines that allowing a paycheck to decide where students go to college instead of academic pursuits would be an awful failure on the part of universities.
- Argues that college athletes should not be given a stipend for competing because they are already paid in the form of scholarships.
- Argues that while sports are profitable for the ncaa and colleges, they aren't making all that much money. the high costs associated with running these sports consume most of the revenue the sport makes.
- Explains that the debate on whether or not to pay college athletes has come up many times over the years. each time, the decision must stand against paying players.
- Opines that paying college athletes would bankrupt most colleges.
1120 wordsRead More - College Athletes: Should They be Paid?analytical essayA lot of people believe college athletes are like employees and should be paid to play. College athletes spend most of their time playing their sport for the college, most athletes see themselves more as athletes than students, and they feel like they should be paid for risking their body’s every day. American colleges and universities should recognize college athletes are paid through scholarships and other opportunities and does not need to provide them additional pay. My goal in this paper is to bring some knowledge to people that people college athletes have it bad, or need more help.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that american colleges and universities should recognize college athletes are paid through scholarships and other opportunities and does not need to provide them additional pay.
- Explains that they have organized their paper into four main sections, two of which have sub-sections. they provide an account for three important factors about college athletes: don’t have to pay for anything, gives them the chance to pursue academic or athletic goals, and how they should have better rights or benefits.
- Analyzes how colleges pay student-athletes to play for them with the scholarships they give them. the average value of a full, in-state public school scholarship is $25,000 annually.
- Analyzes how the colleges provide transportation for student-athletes, free travel and gear, coaching and mentoring, academic support, and a platform to better their chances for pro careers.
- Explains that college scholarships give student-athletes the chance to pursue their own academic or athletic goals, while trying to make their life as easy as possible.
- Analyzes how many colleges would not be able to pay their student-athletes without having serious debt and money problems.
- Explains that if you pay student-athletes to play a sport for your school, they are professionals. the ncaa has already changed their definition of amateur.
- Opines that colleges and universities need to realize that it is not for the money. collegiate level sports are played against each other to prove who the best players truly are and who deserves to go pro.
- Argues that paying student-athletes to play sports would affect the smaller schools a lot more than it would the big ones.
- Opines that money is a huge problem with paying student-athletes because they are amateurs and shouldn't be paid. the ncaa already has bent their own rules to satisfy them, but they just keep wanting more.
- Argues that colleges and universities should pay their student-athletes to play sports for them. the average full in-state sport scholarship is $25,000 a year and covers tuition, fees, room, board, and expensive text books.
- Argues that college student-athletes should be paid to play, but the ncaa would not be able to afford to pay them. the ncaa and all of the college players need to come to an agreement.
1690 wordsRead More - Should College Athletes Be Paid?analytical essayThere are many people out there that believe that college athletes should not be paid because they are called to be a student first and an athlete second (Farrey). There are an ample amount of people and articles that suggest that paying college athletes is unfair and that they do not deserve to be compensated for their contributions to their respective schools. These people argue that these athletes and “st...
In this essay, the author
- Opines that college athletes deserve to be paid because of their hard work, dedication, and effort in their respective sports.
- Argues that college athletes should not be paid because they are called to be a student first and an athlete second.
- Explains that college athletes are exploited and deserve to be compensated for their services while playing sports. the term "student-athlete" is nothing more than a cover up that colleges use so that they do not have to pay any of their athletes.
- Explains that college athletes are one of the hardest working groups of people out there. they have to balance school and maintain a certain grade point average to compete.
- Analyzes how aj mccarron, former alabama quarterback, spoke about how college athletes should be paid. he said that the ncaa is a great organization but they take advantage of their athletes.
- Concludes that college athletes should be paid because of their hard work, dedication, and effort. they are a major source of income for their schools and are not receiving anything for it.
- Opines that college athletes should not receive payment for playing. boudway, ira, dodd, dennis, howe, jeff, mitrosilis, teddy.
1224 wordsRead More - Athltesopinion essayA common problem in the world of college sports is the idea, as an athlete one should get paid for the sports played. This may be the greediness of humans in general, but in ways it also has an egotistic theme to it. It is felt athletes should be paid because they bring publicity and money to the school, or that they use their ability for the school and they could get hurt and not have any way to pursue what they love and seek to make a living in; sports.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that athletes should be paid for the sports they play because they bring publicity and money to the school, or use their ability to get hurt and not pursue what they love.
- Explains that ncaa rules limit athletes' benefits, such as being paid, because they feel it is not necessary for a player to receive money while playing for their school.
- Argues that a player brings publicity to their school, but this shouldn't be counteracted with paychecks. the college supplies them with equipment, facilities, publicity, and opportunity to comfortably play their sport.
- Explains that fans love watching their team play, which makes them want to buy tickets, wear fan wear, and donate to help fund the programs. players bring in all this revenue in with their shown abilities, so they should be paid for it.
- Opines that players are putting their bodies on the line for the sport they love. injury can happen in the simplest of competition. players should not be paid for this liability.
- Opines that a college should support eric legrand for the rest of his life. he deserves pay for his bills and job, which was likely moving on to play in the nfl.
- Opines that the accolades and benefits receive, is payment enough. the argument will always be two-sided, but there isn't a great reason for athletes to be paid.
529 wordsRead More - Should Student-Athletes Be Paid?analytical essayCollege athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college athletes are one of the hardest working people in the world. they play for school pride and bragging rights, not because it is their job.
- Argues that colleges should reimburse athletes for the millions of dollars they make off of their athletic abilities.
- Explains that paying college athletes would eliminate some of the problems that occur due to rule violations. the ncaa creates all the rules and regulations and works diligently to enforce the law.
- Opines that the ncaa should revise the rule so that players could make money off of autographs or receive a stipend from the school for playing sports.
- Opines that athletes should be paid for all the time they put in to sports because they deserve it.
- Argues that scholarships should be given for all that an athlete provides to a school. colleges and the ncaa should come together to pay the student-athletes during the active season.
- Argues that student-athletes should be paid to encourage them to stay in school and finish their education.
- Argues that college athletes should be paid money because otherwise it is unjust.
- Opines that college sports are a big money business and college coaches have become millionaires because of the student-athletes.
- Analyzes birkenes, adele, and akash bagaria's "pay to play." current events feb 06 2012: 7. proquest.
- Explains woods, al, and christine watkins, sports and athletes: an anthology, greenhaven press, 2009.
- Analyzes cooper, kenneth j., "should college athletes be paid to play?" diverse issues in higher education.
- Opines that college football players should be paid. the new york times upfront nov 17 2008: 22. proquest.
- Opines that the ncaa requires the loss of contests for six ohio state football student-athletes.
1960 wordsRead More - Arguments Against Paying College Athletesanalytical essayPaying college athletes has been an ongoing controversy for many years because of the NCAA’s mission to position their athletes as students first and foremost; but, are student athletes really going to college to get an education or to prepare for turning professional. Some argue that athletes are paid already with the compensation given such as free tuition, housing, athletic clothing, etc. However, others claim that athletes are not paid their fair market value. Zach Dirlam, a senior analyst for the Bleacher Report, and Jeff Dorfman, a contributor to Forbs, examine paying college athletes for two different audiences in their respective articles “There’s No Crying in College: The Case Against Paying College Athletes” and “Pay College Athletes?
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how zach dirlam, a bleacher report senior analyst, and jeff dorfman examine paying college athletes for two different audiences in their articles.
- Analyzes how both dirlam and dorfman use logic to support their arguments.
- Analyzes how dorfman relies too much on his past experience to be deemed reliable and lacks a connection with the reader.
- Analyzes how dirlam solidifies his credibility when he provides sources to back up his information and connects well with his audience showing empathy for them.
- Analyzes how dirlam and dorfman explore the topic of paying college athletes in hopes of persuading their target audiences to take their stance on the issue.
1367 wordsRead More - Why Do Student Athletes Get Paidanalytical essayOver the past few decades, there has been controversy over whether or not NCAA athletes should get paid in addition to the other incentives they already receive. This debate emerged in 1991 when the University of Michigan men’s basketball team, also referred to as the Fab Five, was recognized as the best recruiting class in college basketball history. Although NCAA athletes dedicate much of their time and energy to sport, they receive scholarships that cover majority of their college expenses giving them an unfair advantage, therefore student athletes should not get paid for participating in sport. (CHANGE THESIS A BIT)
In this essay, the author
- Explains that there has been controversy over whether or not ncaa athletes should get paid in addition to the other incentives they already receive. the university of michigan men's basketball team was recognized as the best recruiting class in college basketball history.
- Argues that the ncaa cannot afford to pay student athletes because of the incentives they are awarded.
- Explains that an athletic scholarship at an ncaa division i university is about $65,000 if you enroll at a college with high tuition.
- Analyzes how student athletes receive full scholarships, but the amount of money provided differs from place to place. if the ncaa started to pay students, they would be at an advantage because they are receiving more funding for their tuition.
- Analyzes posnanski's article, "the college connection", which reports the benefits that college athletes receive for their involvement with the ncaa.
- Explains that a student athlete on full scholarship receives education, room, board, and coaching/training worth between $50,000 and $125,000 per year depending on their sport and whether they attend public or private universities.
- Explains that a full-time student who doesn't participate in sport graduates from college with no debt, and an opportunity to become professional league athletes.
- Explains that many people believe that ncaa athletes should get paid because of their intense dedication to sport, while others refer to this participation as a student athlete's full-time job.
708 wordsRead More - Student Athletes Should Not be Paidanalytical essayZimbalist, Andrew S. Unpaid Professionals: Commercialism And Conflict In Big-Time College Sports. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 27 Mar. 2014.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that the best argument against paying players is that it diminishes the value of an education. state university has breached its academic standard by allocating unnecessary expenditures to athletically advanced students.
- Argues that student athletes should not be paid more than any other student at state university because it implies that the focus of this university is that an extracurricular activity as a means of profit.
- Argues that the metaphorical wall between academically focused and athletically geared students is more influential than adoration of sports.
- Argues that paying student athletes to play for state university creates a bridge between athletically and academically achieving students.
- Explains that intercollegiate athletics is becoming the central focus of colleges and universities, as it is a competition of the financially fittest. having the best players could lead to an innumerable student body that would become the richest alumni.
- Argues that college athletics needs to be brought closer to academics, and that the lack of information regarding how much state university pays athletes feeds into the premise that there is indeed a bridge in between regular students and athletes.
- Analyzes how the 'pay for play' model isn't a foolproof solution for academically engaged african-american college athletes.
1793 wordsRead More - College Sports - Slavery and the NCAAanalytical essayAbstract: Collegiate athletes participating in the two revenue sports (football, men's basketball) sacrifice their time, education, and risk physical harm for their respected programs. The players are controlled by a governing body (NCAA) that dictates when they can show up to work, and when they cannot show up for work. They are restricted from making any substantial financial gains outside of their sports arena. These athletes receive no compensation for their efforts, while others prosper from their abilities. The athletes participating in the two revenue sports of college athletics, football and men's basketball should be compensated for their time, dedication, and work put forth in their respected sports.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that chris porter, a one-time star basketball player at auburn university, was ruled ineligible for taking twenty-five hundred dollars from someone representing an agent — he used the money to keep his mother from getting evicted.
- Describes the nine college football coaches who will be paid at least one million dollars or more in overall compensation.
- Argues that the loan program passed by the ncaa is ridiculous and unfair to athletes who are not projected to be probable high draft picks.
- Argues that collegiate athletes should be compensated for their time, dedication, and work put forth in their respected sports.
- Explains that the ncaa and their rules governing amateurism have a major impact on the athletes that assume that title. the coaches of college teams reap the benefits for the efforts that their athletes put forth during competition.
- Argues that the ncaa is an adverse organization to change, especially when the proponents are student-athletes.
- Argues that paying college athletes who participate in the two revenue sports of men's basketball and football is not a bad idea at all.
- Quotes walter byers' book, "unsportsmanlike conduct: exploiting college athletes." the ncaa needs to forget about "saving face" and realize that times have changed.
- Opines that it could take a while for amateur athletes seeking greater compensation to make headway against the ncaa.
- Quotes suggs, welch, and wulf, steve, in their article, "ncaa faces wave of criticism over crackdown on payments to players while in high school."
3437 wordsRead More