Furthermore, there are benefits student players already receive, such as scholarships and other aids from their school. The scholarship conta... ... middle of paper ... ...cusing on getting an education as well as their sport; whereas, professionals are just focusing on their sport. I believe college athletes should not get paid for various reasons: they receive scholarships, perks and it would create problems with the university expenses. Paying student athletes would create major issues that the universities might face. It may lead to athletic departments becoming more of a business instead of helping athletes receive an education.
Students that attend college should not get paid for playing sports. People go to college to get an education not to get rich. The experience of college itself is priceless. If the college pays players in one sport they will have to pay players in all sports. Scholarships already pay for individuals’ education.
This can possibly cause the student-athlete to fall behind in t... ... middle of paper ... ...stitution they attend. Paying student-athletes to participate in any sports program would dilute the reason students attend college in the first place, which is to receive an education. By offering a salary to student-athletes, it would change the reason why students apply to college and universities. Instead of wanting to attend to receive an education, students would rather attend under the sports umbrella in the hopes of attaining an income. Student-athletes should be given an opportunity to participate in a sports program because of their ability and love of the game.
One consequence of passing a law relating to student-athletes receiving money may be possibly corrupting the NCAA system. Because the argument is based on how much the sport makes for the school, gambling and shaving points may occur more frequently in intercollegiate athletics. Shaving points is a method people use to pay off players if they miss shots on purpose in order to lose. Already a huge problem, this suggests athletes might have easier access to money and would affect their play. Another reason that athletes should not get paid is because they aren’t professionals yet.
Many colleges also use the revenue to recruit incoming players. “Division I teams often spend large amounts of money recruiting the best players and coaches. Although players are not paid, they are often given athletic scholarships to attend college” (Cline). There really is no need to pay college athletes since they are given scholarships. Some people argue that they need personal expense money.
Many may think the system is just right the way it is, but they are not the ones who is taking the beating these young adults take physically and mentally. The people who think it is right not to pay these kids are not considering the needs of the athletes. These colleges earn enough revenue to pay students, especially the top athletic programs. In conclusion, college sports will always be a huge money making industry in the United States. If they want to eliminate the problem of athletes taking bribes from boosters, they should take better care of their athletes by paying them for their
Why, then, must the football or basketball star be prohibited from using his or her talent to make a profit?” (Camp). College athletes deserve some sort of payment from either the university or NCAA. They aren’t asking for thousands of dollars a month, but simply just a couple hundred dollars to allow them to have a normal student life. For the millions of dollars they acquire for the university, it is only right to give some back. College sports will always be a big money maker and attraction for major universities; therefore, they should take better care of their athletes and pay them for their services.
Even the lucky few who make it, may end up getting screwed since they go from having no money to being rich. That sounds great, but how likely is it that they know how to manage their money so they can stay wealthy? Having an agent or financial advisor in their college days could help, but the NCAA forbids it. The NCAA is a growing program but is has to make some changes if it wants to be fair to the student athletes associated with them. These changes should include granting student athletes stipends, better rules for agents, and clearer scholarships.
Colleges and Universities Must Compensate Student Athletes Today, sports are no longer fun and games, sports are a business, and college sports are no different. College sports provide a huge source of universities’ income. The school takes in money from ticket sales, television contracts, and sport-related merchandise, just to name a few. The athletes, however, receive their scholarship and little more. While the prospect of receiving a free college education is something few would complain about, when the issue is more closely examined it becomes evident that it is not enough.
He further claims that schools aren 't even "out a nickel" when providing college athletes with their all expense paid vacation to to free education (Prewitt 1). What’s “Laughable, but it’s not funny” is this blatantly obnoxious response to the issue. Though there should be acknowledgement given to the amount of money coaches earn, that 's their profession. They train these young athletes to perform on the level they do and bring profit from it. Without coaches there would be no gain.