Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Collaborative Leadership: A Case Study
Chrislip and Larson's six principles of collaborative leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Collaborative Leadership: A Case Study
The book Collaborative Leadership by Chrislip and Larson was an interesting read with great insight regarding how to tackle critical issues and challenges many communities face today in a new and meaningful way. Using real, varied examples of complex community based predicaments that were navigated successfully utilizing a collaborative leadership approach, authors Chrislip and Larson were able to outline ways to take up complex community issues by unifying a diverse, often frustrated group of citizens in a way that enables them to overcome bureaucratic barriers and legacy process. At the core of the book, Chrislip and Larson indicate that “successful collaborative initiatives depend on a thorough understanding of the motivation and the context …show more content…
While it seems simple, the authors later provide greater detail and unveil the complexity and challenges within collaborative leadership. The authors also discuss traditional leadership and why it is failing citizen and communities during the first section. The authors site increasing complexity within society along with fragmentation of traditional power within towns, cities, and counties within our country as the primary reasons for failing traditional leadership. Citizens are more diverse than ever, yet they are focused on individualism. Traditional leadership fails to prevent societal division from occurring when these diverse citizens come together with their individual needs. This division has resulted in frustrated citizens and leaders …show more content…
The section begins with an overview of “six exemplary cases” of complex community issues addressed in various U.S. cities utilizing collaborative leadership (Chrislip, Larson 39). The authors then continue on to discuss what they have identified as the critical keys to successful collaborative leadership. Per Chrislip and Larson, for an initiative to achieve its goals utilizing collaborative leadership, there are things that must be organically present or purposely formulated into the collaborative process to ensure success. These things are “a good timing and a clear need, strong stakeholder groups, broad based involvement, credibility and openness of the process, commitment of high level leaders, visible leader involvement, support of established authorities, an ability to overcome mistrust and skepticism, and strong leadership of the actual process” (Chrislip, Larson 52-53). In addition, there must be a deep understanding regarding the need to collaborate. Group members from varied backgrounds need to understand why all experiences, opinions, efforts, and ideas are needed and the group at large must “buy-in” to the idea that the resolution itself requires the input and buy-in from the all members of the varied group. Section two then continues on to reveal why this type of collaborative leadership can be difficult and how each of the critical things needed
The author writes that in asset based community development and a core Public Allies belief, is that the symbolic “glass of water” is both half empty and half full. The author extends the example to individuals as well as communities in saying that “ever member of a community, no exceptions, has gifts and talents that contribute to the community.” Additionally, every individual and community has weaknesses, and the proper application of leadership is to combine everybody’s assets to counter everybody’s weaknesses in the process of improving our communities. Public Allies makes no attempt as an organization to find and correct weaknesses, they only identify Allies’ assets to train them into community leaders. These ideas align well with the authors definition of leadership.
has to build upon the work that has already been done before. The leadership action council
Mlls, D. Q. (2005). Leadership How to Lead, How to Live. Boston: Harvad Business School Press.
Participative (Democratic) leadership is, as its name implies, a participation of the group. The participants all collaborate in the decisions the group must make. “Researchers have found that this learning style is usually one of the most effective and lead to higher productivity, better contributions from the group members, and increased moral.”
Ibarra, H. and Hansen, M. (2011). Are You a Collaborative Leader? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/2011/07/are-you-a-collaborative-leader/ar/1
Particularly, two members within my group began to emerge as leaders due to their knowledge, skills, as well as experience working with our chosen population. Although I always view them as ‘experts’ in this topic, our group became less focused on our goals and more concerned about the ‘power struggle’ between our two leaders, before we could reach any consensus. Essentially, our group had two authoritarians butting heads and trying to take lead throughout the beginning of the group process. Thus, the other members or ‘followers’ contribution, like mine, seem to not matter unless they adhered to either leaders’ opinions without question. According to Stringer (2014), “Leadership… Is defined according to its function of facilitating organizational and operational processes, rather than defining and controlling them” (p. 31). The researcher further states that active participation is the key to encourage and motivate group members to invest their time and energy to shape the quality of the group's production. Therefore, our group needed to find ways for all members to have a chance to participate fully and apply their individual strengths, in order to enhance our group’s
The leadership is a privilege and it is such a privilege and an honor which will carry the tremendous responsibility which will inspire others to direct them to accomplish goals and vision of the organization. Leadership is about influencing the people, by producing direction, purpose and motivating in order to accomplish the mission, vision and improving the organization. The leadership philosophy is evolved based on the experiences, both positive and negative, in most of the initiatives and activities that we undertake. It is also one among the collaboration and teamwork within which the team members can utilize each other’s strengths to counter the weaknesses of the individuals. By observing, introspecting and experimenting we can developed a leadership paradigm which is inclusive, collaborative and proactive. We can develop the ability to recognize which will approach in order to reach the productive conclusion. The great leaders know their limitations and are capable at utilize their strengths and also the strengths of others to compensate.
Throughout the course of a Master’s counseling program, moments of doubt, and a lack of working knowledge are bound to play a major role in the confidence a future counselor will posses in effectively implementing interventions early on in the instructional phase of his or her career. Corey (2010) states that an effective group leader, is able to become aware of their own vulnerabilities, and take responsibility in their responses. To become aware of a possible vulnerable area, a counselor must first take a concise look into their personal strengths and weakness, and then decide to actively seek out assistance with working on vulnerabilities. In exploring the roles of an effective group leader, I have realized that within the group process, I most fear the roles of a group leader that pertain to direct confrontation of a client, I also fear that the improper implementation of a intervention could lead to potential harm of the client. Attending to these fears I hold regarding group member confrontation, and intervention implementation is the key to gaining further understanding into how I can become comfortable with these essential functions of a group leader. The current paper will take a closer look into my vulnerabilities, using current research to gain insight into how I can overcome fears, when facilitating a task, psycho-educational, counseling, and psychotherapy group.
Chrislip, D. D., & Larson, C. E. (1994). Collaborative Leadership: How Citizens and Civic Leaders Can Make a Difference. San Francisco, California , USA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Retrieved December 2, 2013
I am feeling that my leadership style is collaborative. It means that I am willing to hear and accommodate the inputs and feedback from my team member. My decision-making process is started with the brainstorming, discussion and idea generation from all team members, to make sure that everyone in the team is aware and contributes to the decision process. I also always encourage the team member to speak up and provide any ideas or feedback during the decision-making process. In the end, I will feel that my final decision would be a team decision, so everyone in the team will be honored. I believe that the involvement is the key success factor of the teamwork. In the simulation of Matterhorn Health, I collaborated with all the people in the organization and considered their ideas or point of view in making my decisions.
There has been sufficient evidence shown over the past few years that teamwork, especially within leadership, directly affects the health care system in a positive way (Miller, Walmsley, & Williams, 2007). The Health Foundation, “made a decision to invest in a Shared Leadership for Change initiative – leadership development for teams rather than individuals – as a component of its strategic aim ‘Developing leaders to improve health and health care services’” (Miller, Walmsley, & Williams, 2007, p. 24). In most instances, when a group of people with the same set of goals come together to work towards that goal the results are usually better than individual work. The same concept is true for those with leadership roles in the nursing or any health care department. Shared leadership utilized in health care will have enhanced clinical team and
Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Lussier, R.N. & Achua, C.F. (2010). Leadership: Theory, application, skill development (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
...he solution. Instead the solution is to develop richer and more complex processes of accomplishing the leadership tasks. Project Managers facing a complex challenge should focus on how to set direction for the team, create alignment between them, and generate their commitment and ignore how many people are, or are not, leaders. Making the accomplishment of the leadership tasks at the core of leadership raises new questions: What are the barriers or obstacles project managers should clears in order to set a clear direction, create an effective alignment, and generate a solid commitment? What resources exist in the organization that project managers could tap in for creating direction, alignment, and commitment as a complex challenge is being tackled? Answering these kind of questions can assist organizations avoid the traditional problems of distributed leadership
Many people associate leadership with a specific job title or form of power within an organization. However, through personal experience, I have concluded that leadership can come in many forms and position as well as from multiple sources of roles and job titles both with and without power. Based on the definition of leadership, anyone can be considered a leader as long as they have the ability to influence people to achieve a particular result or goal which benefits the organization or group as a whole. Individuals with a secure sense of self and understanding, acceptance of diversity within an organization tend to be the strongest leaders that not only make others want to follow, but they also encourage other leaders to gravitate to their