Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflections on behavioral change
Health Behavior Change Focus
• behaviour change approach to health promotion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflections on behavioral change
In this week lecture, we compile the different level of approaches to target behavior change. We reviewed behavioral change approach with the primary goal of modifying individual behavior through cognitions by the provision of education and raising awareness. We also reviewed self-empowerment approach with the focus on helping individuals make choices through participatory learning techniques and increases one control over physical, social and internal environments. Last, we introduce collective action or community development approach. This approach looks to improve health by addressing the social determinates of health. This approach instead of targeting only individuals or individual interpersonal relationship, it targets multilevel factors that affects the health of individuals such as policy, laws, …show more content…
The CDC ecological framework states that health intervention should target individual, relationship, community, and societal. Similar to the CDC ecological model Mcleroy model has the following levels: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community and public policy. Although, both the CDC ecological and the Mcleroy model are both very self-explanatory, the first person to bring about the idea of health intervention on a ecological framework was Urie Bronfenbrenner. He found an interaction of several ecological levels with children development and behavior. First level he found, microsystem, which is an immediate environment a person operate such as parent, school and day care. Second level, mesosystem is the interaction of two-microsystem environment such as parents and schoolteacher or day care. Third, exosystem is social system that encompasses both meso and microsystem. An example of exosystem would be school districts, department of children services. Four, macrosystem is the larger cultural context such as societal/cultural norm. Lastly, Chronosystem is multiple systems operating over
Microsystem. There are several immediate factors acting on the individual. This nearest level of the system is known as the microsystem that directly interacts with the individual. This system might include forces such as family, peers, school, or religion. (Video 1)
Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., Lewis, F.M. (2002). Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
The main concept, or topics of this paper is personal wellness and behaviour change. It will explore the seven dimensions of health, and the negative and the positives of each one. The paper will show how one dimension of health affects another dimension. For behaviour change there will be topics including the, barriers, stages, and health behaviors for change. As well it will be discussed about the two personal goals each student was to make at the beginning of the course, and show the plan in which they went by and how they assessed themselves. Showing the challenges one may have trying to achieve these goals, and strategies to overcome each one is another topic discussed. Some of the topics discussed are related to personal opinions with
Ecological theory is a theory developed by Urie Bronfenbrenner that states that the “systems” around you are vitally important in human development. Within the theory there are many systems including the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem. Each system is defined by a different aspect of a person’s surroundings that would affect their development. The systems begin with the aspect that is closest to you, your day-to-day life. The Microsystem includes all of the places, people, and experiences that are found in your daily life. These include school, work, parents. friends, neighbors, and so forth. The next most impactful system is the exosystem. The mesosystem is defined by two entities within your microsysytem affecting each other. The next system is called the exosystem. The exosystem is full of things that don’t affect you directly but will eventually
The Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Theory focuses on how ones environment can affect a person’s development. It focuses on 5 main areas namely the Microsystem, Mesosystem, Exosystem, Macrosystem and Chronosystem (Bronfenbrenner, 1977, p. 514-515). Each system represents the setting in which they live in and how these people affect their growth. In this particular case study, Andy’s main influence is from the Microsystem and Mesosystem.
It is the largest and final outer layer which wrap the microsystem, mesosystem, and exosystem. Refers to Boemmel and Briscoe (2001), macrosystem influence and support child within the environment such as economic patterns, customs, society, and nationality. As stated by Paquette and Ryan (2001), the principles have a cascading influence throughout the interactions of external layers. As an example, if the culture belief parents should be solely responsible for taking care and raising their children, then the culture is less likely provide available sources to guide the parents. Thus, this affects the parents function based on the parents' ability or inability to carry the responsibility.
Therefore Adler et al noted that existing evidence seems to suggest that better population health would be achievable through the formulation of a health policy framework that addresses the behavioral and social determinants of health. After all, Short et al (2015) also opined that at any particular point in time, an individual’s health behaviors and health are a stark reflection of their physical endowments combined with their circumstances and experiences over time. This is within the physical and social contexts. The social milieu of health is of great importance to the overall population health. The important thing to note
The mesosystem includes the connection between the structures of the child’s microsystem (Berk, 2000). The exosystem includes the child interacting with some structure in her microsystem (Berk, 2000). The macrosystem the outermost layer in the child’s environment is comprised of cultural values, customs, and laws (Berk, 2000).
Social ecological perspectives are often described as a web of relationships (k218, Learning guide 3, 3.1). They make us aware that each individual has many defining factors making up who they are. Social ecological perspectives have the child/young person at the centre and show how they are connected to the family, community and society as a whole. They demonstrate the layers that go into making the individual and show that everybody has a unique set of circumstances that affect the person they are, their achievements, social standing and even their health. Social ecological perspectives give us the opportunity to quantify these factors and offer a tool to collate the data, giving us the chance to see how factors such as employment, housing or demographic area can affect life chances in both the short and long term. Social economic perspectives tell us that to fully understand the individual we must also understand their environment and how they are connected to it. Rather than just looking at the child or young person on a standalone basis we must look at what factors affect their behaviour, where they are living, what the home or community environment is like and try to respond appropriately to this.
In this assignment I am going to assess how the social context may influence the ability of health education campaigns to change behaviour in relation to health. Health education is described as any activity promoting health related learning which can help bring about changes in the thinking or behaviour of individuals. The main purpose of this is to improve the health of people. There are different approaches to health. These approaches all have different explanations and focuses on health of people.
The SMART goal of the obesity program is to reduce the obese population in Pitt County by creating a healthier diet program. Different objectives will be needed in order to reach this goal. The first objective is that from July 2016 through December 2016 100 community members will participate in the health department’s health promotion activities. This objective aligns with the reinforcement construct of the Social Cognitive Theory. By repeatedly participating in the activities, the 100 community members will be rewarded with the knowledge they receive and also motivation to change their behavior. By having an enjoyable time, they will be rewarded and want to keep coming back to the activities. The second objective is that following the 6-month duration; the majority of the participants will lose 2-10% of their original body weight by changing to a healthier diet. The reason the participants need to lose 2-10% of their body weight is to either prevent or reduce the chances of gaining other health diseases associated with obesity, including coronary artery disease and Type 2 Diabetes. This objective aligns with the self-efficacy construct. By losing a little bit of body fat, the participants will believe in their ability to lose weight, and continue to do so. The third objective is that on June 17 and June 24, informational brochures will be distributed to the community members to create awareness and reminders to join the obesity program, and gain knowledge about the health condition of obesity. This objective deals with the behavioral capability construct of the Social Cognitive Theory because the participants will gain the knowledge and skills needed to change their behavior through the brochures.
There are three major theories used to model behaviour change at the individual level. The Health Belief Model (Becker et al 1997) is a motivation-based framework that uses the desire to avoid negative health outcomes to promote positive health actions. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (Ajzen 1985) suggests that intention is the most important determinant of behaviour, and can be influenced by both attitudes and subjective norms. The final model is the Trans-theoretical Model (TTM), which I will use to critically assess my own proposed health-behaviour change.
Effective identification of the issues will push the individuals within the target population to start looking at ways in which they can address the problem. This will create an environment where such individuals will readily embrace the change initiative with the hope that it will provide the much-needed support and guidance to the eversion of the health issue and the promotion of better life quality through the adoption of healthy lifestyles characterized by proper nutrition and productive physical activity. Therefore, the identification of the issue will have a galvanizing effect on the target
Urie Bronfenbrenner was a psychologist who developed the ecological systems theory. This theory views the child as developing within a complex system of relationships affected by multiple levels of the surrounding environment. He divided the environment into five different levels, the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and an ever-changing system (chronosystem). The microsystem is the system closest to the child like whom they have direct contact with such as family members and peers.
Nancy Milio proposed that an individual’s health and lifestyle choices are influenced by resources, availability, cost and convenience more than knowledge obtained from education. This thought provides the framework for influencing community habits by developing policies that protect and promote health (Nies & McEwan, 2015-a). In this paper, I will identify and analyze a community health problem using Milio’s framework for prevention, use Healthy People 2020 to find national goals that relate to my diagnosis and develop one long-term goal, three short-term goals, and accompanying interventions.