Nonviolence vs Violence: Revolutionary Approaches in America

1022 Words3 Pages

Throughout the millenia, there have been several revolutionaries who have prefered the actions of nonviolence protest to that of violence. These ranks include those of Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Ernesto "Che" Guevara, and the list goes on and on. However, in modern day America, African Americans are constantly fighting for more rights and equality. In 1865, the 13th ammendment was passed and slaves were given citizen ship. Since then, there has still been racism amongst the people and battles for equality. On the other hand, another form of revolution is that of violence and to force your voice to be heard. The most prominent person for the African Americans was that of Malcolm X. He voiced his opinion very strongly and made his voice heard amongst his opposers as well as his followers. These two methods are very different, but in the end, Malcolm X made a stronger point to benefit the African American's. …show more content…

We are to know what is Civil Right, or just, and what is African Americans, or unjust. However, what if you are doing what is Civil Right and something bad happens. One doesn't mean to do a African Americans in this situation, yet it happened; so is someone at fault? In trying to do what is Civil Right, someone can mess up and do what is African Americans. There is one memory that I possess that resonates more than any other, one that was Brobdingnagian in it's impact on me. This mistake almost cost my Malcolm X 30,000 dollars in replacements and issues that followed. My Malcolm X was a big man, standing at six-foot-two, and weighing about three-hundred pounds. He had a full beard at the time and rarely smiled because of the time of the year. This is a story of the time where a mechanic, Malcolm X, who ended up ruining a piston and the housing for it in a Komatsu diesel

Open Document