Autonomy Transactional Analysis

1901 Words4 Pages

As a group facilitator or a group leader, it can be difficult to stick to just one technique to help clients reach personal goals. What works for one set of clients might not necessarily work for another group. There is no rule that states that a group leader must stick to just one technique. Transactional Analysis and Cognitive Behavioral are both great cognitive ways to help clients from different types of group reach their personal goals. TRANSACTIONAL ANALYSIS Transactional Analysis, also known as TA is the theory of “personality, a language of behavior, and an organizational system of interactional therapy. It is grounded on the assumption that we make current decision based on early experiences.” (Corey. 2014. pg. 325) Autonomy …show more content…

Each one is just as important as the next for clients to be successful with their own contract. In the initial stage, the group facilitator attempts to help the client discover what aspects of their life are not working for them and where change needs to start occurring. In the initial stage is also where trust is established, both between client and group leader and between group members themselves. The facilitator starts to question their contract, what exactly they are trying to get out of this group session, or as an ultimate …show more content…

Its goal is to change patterns of thinking or behavior that are behind people's difficulties, and so change the way they feel. (Martin) CBT is an educational approach and focuses on clients’ current problems. This particular approach to group therapy is focused on scientific method. The goal of the group leader is to navigate the client in fixing his problems by conducing behavioral assessment, coming up with treatment goals, formulating a treatment procedure towards the problem, and since it is a scientific method, the last step would be to evaluate the outcomes of the

Open Document