1.2 Problems In Obtaining Audit Evidence During my industrial training at Aljafree & Co, there are several significant problems that might be occur during the gathering information of audit evidence and the problems that incurred can cause the auditing works cannot to proceed very well. The problems that have to consider are:- a) Inadequate records When conducting audit for the company that has high level of difficulty, it is hard for them to identify appropriate audit evidence since there is a lot document that they cannot to obtain. Inadequate records are defines as “lack of records” or records so incomplete that correctness of information cannot be determined. For the example, incomplete files, excessive adjustments to books and accounts, …show more content…
However, some of their client did not give cooperation and collaboration to give the information necessary. So, this will lead to the delay and audit process cannot be proceed smoothly. Auditors need to have sufficient evidence to ensure that to prove that financial statement which are prepare are true and in fair view free from any fraud and misstatements. As for example, during my practical day at Aljafree & Co, I also face with a lot of problems with client related to obtain information like a difficulty to call the client, and I request any information to make as audit evidence, but they just ignore …show more content…
According to the ISA, audit evidence need to be ‘sufficient’ and ‘appropriate’ because sufficient refer to the quantity, as well as the quality, of the audit evidence. Appropriateness of audit evidence means that its relates to the nature and timing of audit procedures. Appropriateness (the quality of audit evidence) is achieved if the evidence are obtained is valid and reliable. Besides that, the audit evidence also should be sufficiency documented so that they can use before issuing auditor’s
Auditors do not provide audit opinions for different levels of assurance. Therefore, auditors consider providing more or less assurance when modifying evidence for engagement risk to be unnecessary. However, auditors should be professionally responsible to accumulate additional evidence, assign more experienced personnel, and review the audit more thoroughly, particularly when a client poses a higher than normal degree of engagement risk. The auditor should also modify evidence for engagement risk when high legal exposure and other potential actions affecting the auditor
During the 2004 DHB audit, the company’s independent auditors had considerable difficulty obtaining reliable audit evidence regarding the $7 million of obsolete vest components that allegedly had been destroyed by a hurricane. What responsibility do auditors have when the client cannot provide the evidence they need to complete one or more audit tests or procedures?
According to PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3520 a registered public accounting firm and its associated persons must be independent of the firm's audit client throughout the audit and professional engagement period. Independence is required for all audit engagements. The auditor must be independent of an entity when performing an engagement according to General Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS). Independence is very significant to the audit profession, because the primary purpose of an audit is to provide financial statement users with reasonable assurance an on whether the financial statements are presented fairly. The auditor’s report gives credibility to an entity financial statement and without an auditor’s report the financial statement would be consider worthless. Reliance on management for the fair presentation of a financial statement would often result with a bias and impressive financial statements that doesn’t reflect a true picture of the entity’s financial position. An auditor’s independence should not in anyway be influenced by any relationship between their client and
This case covers an audit on the IT department of Bluegreen Corporation; bluegreen corp. is a real estate developer and resort operator based in Florida, arranged by the company’s’ Vice President and CIO Sheila Beauchesne to achieve growth in the IT infrastructure of the company. The audit was carried out by the VP and CIO Sheila Beauchesne to understand the company’s overall spending and expenditure on its IT, GIP (Global information partners) were hired as the auditing team, Bluegreens IT financial auditor Krista Parker was made the audits main point of contact in case when the auditing team needs any information regarding the organization, and the IT manager of support Gary Kaul
There are several important people involved with this project and will help with the necessary changes needed for the Payable Audit System (PAS). Each person has a very detailed job description and the skills that would be used to make the changes to the system. First, Ted Anderson the director of disbursement began to notice how their current system was very labor-intensive. He knew of other ways to increase the productivity to the system and he would help in the plan to transform these changes. First, he changed the mind-set of how the system would work, and he organized a difficult training course with a 9 month duration designed for the employees. With his role on this project the company will make several fundamental changes, to pay the invoices in their tolerance. Keeping all history transactions, they would adopt a quality-control approach. Also eliminating all their paper files they would develop a Document Control System (DCS), where they would scan all of their documents into their computer system.
According to the article authored by Mark Rupert, what are the seven best practices in the roles and responsibilities of an internal audit function?
Integrity in the accounting profession involves adhering to the rules and principles of the profession. This includes remaining free of conflicts of interest and maintaining client relationships in which the accountant can remain objective in discharging his or her responsibilities. This requires independence in fact and in appearance as mandated under section 1.200.001.01, Independence Rule the AICPA Code. In other words, no one should be able to view the accountant as being biased with respect to a client’s financial reporting due to an improper client relationship. Lack of integrity in accounting practices has been, and continues to be, a key element in the downfall of many institutions which has hurt the public trust in the accounting
As audit firms look to invest in big data, it will be even more critical to understand the implications of using big data and analytics on the audit profession. There are multiple ways in which data analytics would enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of external audits. From looking at the complete population, to finding trends, to allowing employees to do less routine tasks, there are multiple ways big data benefits audits. Big data would also enhance critical procedures performed for the sales and collection cycle. These benefits are not without some drawbacks that would need to be addressed by the profession.
The quantity of accounting fraud cases keeps on rising. Fraud is a consistent thing that will reliably be around, and in a bigger number of routes than just a single. An extensive apportion of organizations out there fight with fraud, either from within the organization, or from outside the organization. Knowing how to manage this is essential for an organization to be productive over a drawn out extended period of time. The investigation regarding the matter of accounting fraud will utilize sources from the web and the DeVry school library. The principle territory we are planning to address is accounting fraud and how it could impact an organization by answering, the who, what, when and how. Its goal is to increase the awareness
Exercise of “reasonable skill, care and caution” varies according to situations (Lopes, J. in Kingston Cotton Mill Co 1896). Nevertheless, to achieve such in performing an audit, its an auditors responsibility to comply with the requirements cited in ISA (NZ) 200, as follows (1) Ethical requirements
Auditing has been the backbone of the complicated business world and has always changed with the times. As the business world grew strong, auditors’ roles grew more important. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed. It also became easier with the use of internal controls, which introduced the need for testing, not a complete audit. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. Computers played an important role of changing the way audits were performed and also brought along some difficulties.
Are Auditors Becoming Too Cozy With Their Clients? By: Briloff, Abraham J.. Business & Society Review (00453609), Summer85, Issue 54
Overall, the company is having ineffective controls regarding different departments and in the whole organization. An effective internal audit department should be established within the organization which should test the effectiveness of these controls on regular basis and make it sure that all controls are working effectively and efficiently with the different departments of the organization. Also the Internal auditor should implement the most effective processes and measures to prevent and detect the fraud, corruption and non compliance with the laws and regulations in the organization. Establishment of internal audit committee would be helpful in this regard which comprises of executive and non executive directors.
Audit is a process to evaluate and review the accounts and financial statement objectively. We can divide it into internal auditors and external auditors. Internal auditors have a inner knowledge of business process. Auditor has access to the much confidential information and all levels of management. But they may lose their judgement and they are not acceptable by the shareholder. “The overall objective of the external auditors is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to report on the financial statements in acco...
No matter auditors work with technology or not, the most important thing in process of auditing is evidence. The basic framework for the auditor understands of evidence and its use to support the auditor's opinion on the financial statement. In reaching an opinion on the financial statements, the evidence gathered from the audit procedure is used to determine the fairness of the financial statements and the type of audit report to be issued. The characters of paper audit evidence are: