Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Julius Caesar ambitious
Julius caesar ambition essay
Julius Caesar ambitious
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Julius Caesar ambitious
What was Julius Caesar’s motive for launching the Gallic Wars? Multiple arguments can be made to better understand his intensions. The first argument is that Caesar was responding to aggression in order to preserve the sovereignty of Rome. The second more likely explanation is that Caesar took over the Gaul to improve his political strength within the Roman republic and did so by exploiting the Celts. Caesar’s war commentaries, show evidence of his conflicting motives and actions to his invasion of the Gallic regions. Although there is some credibility to seek security, it is clear that the Gallic people did not present a significant threat to Rome, and is evident in Caesar’s campaigns in the Gaul and the opposition he faced. The primary source used to understand Caesar’s motives is a direct translation from Caesar’s personal
His motive was to bring justice to the peoples of Gaul who he claimed had been of threat to Italy. Caesar even claimed that “Rome was a victim of unprovoked aggression” as a result of the Helvetii’s actions. Where he said that Rome was obliged to punish them for their crimes. Caesar’s rhetoric continues to view the Germans as hostiles for crossing the Rhine River into Gaul. Regardless that the area crossing is further north of Italy he viewed them as a threat. As Caesar continued his campaign into Belgae, the people sought to respond to what they had seen as aggression due to Caesar’s occupation of their territories. Caesar justified this as a threat to Rome. Likewise Caesar made similar accusations of hostilities from Britain that they had supported the enemy, yet stated that only traders had travelled between Gaul and Britain. Caesar’s motive to conquer Gaul can be further seen through the responses and reactions of the Gallic people to his advance through the
Claudius’s Decision to Invade Britain in AD43 as Motivated by a Desire to Emulate Julius Caesar
He wanted to expand his empire, power, and get the Franks out of the Dark Ages. They both had new goals and ideas for their empires, and they would both do whatever it took to achieve them. Many may say that Julius Caesar and Charlemagne are extremely similar, but one could argue that they are also very different. Caesar won peoples loyalty and trust. He also looked out
In this case, the rise of Caesar’s power was considered by some as disregard and disrespect of authority, tradition, and Roman rules. Caesar on many occasions challenged Roman commander Pompey and his main opponent, thus leading to many civil wars. Additionally, his decision to cross Rubicon was contrary to the Roman law that restricted him to enter Rome because he was a governor of Gaul at the time. Additionally, following Pompey’s death, Caesar conferred more powers to himself by diluting the Senate’s reaches and powers (Alvin 82). One major flaw that Caesar possessed was his strong ambition. This made him overconfident and thought he had become invincible both in Rome and battle. Because his soldiers respected and loved him, Caesar thought that he would pursue whatever he desired. This is what led to his
Caesar, Julius. "The Internet Classics Archive | The Gallic Wars by Julius Caesar." The Internet Classics Archive | The Gallic Wars by Julius Caesar. Web. 28 May 2014. .
Julius Caesar was unquestionable a cunning Politian as portrayed within historical documents, even though the events were documented after the accounts of his rule materialized there are still numerous theories about his political ability’s and how he was viewed by the people he governed. This paper is intended to present the reader clear vision on how Julius Caesar was viewed during his dictatorship of Rome. Was Julius Caesar a selfish dictator or model politician? There will be five diverse source accounts of the events which will be examined for similarities and differences based on the historical evidences.
...for the Romans. Besides that, he conquered Gaul (modern France) and defeated his rival Pompey in the civil war of 49-45 BC. By doing so, he managed to bring peace to Rome and also expanded Rome's provinces. Caesar proved himself as a potential leader, whom the Romans agreed after the conspirators killed him.
Julius Caesar was ruling over the Roman provinces of Gaul, (now modern day France, Belgium, and parts of Germany), as governor and military commander. After his campaign against the Germanic tribes attacking Gaul, Caesar turned his attention toward Britain. While Gaul was still out of Roman control, the kingdoms of Britain assisted Gaul in their fight against the Romans. “Therefore, in August of the year 55 BC, Caesar along with two
After spending so much time and energy on his bridge, Caesar ended up tearing it down. “He marched back across the dignity bridge. And tore it down,” the document states. After all the handwork and resources used, Caesar ended up tearing down the bridge. If he was just going to tear it down after, why waste all the time and resources to make a bold statement when he had other options? There was no reason to build a whole bridge just to tear it down after, especially when the Ubians offered a perfectly stable way to cross the river. The Romans could have scared the Germani even by crossing the river with
Gaius Julius Caesar was born in Rome in July 100 BC. Rome was a Republic at this time. He was a statesman, Roman general, Consul, and notable author of Latin prose. He played a significant role in the events that led to the collapse of the Roman Republic and rise of the Roman Empire. He was a leader in a nation where the people were not involved in the government decision-making process. Thus, he had majority of the power in the Republic and was able to form a huge army. He was able to triumph, conquer new lands with the army at his grasp and command. As Caesar acquired more power over the years, som...
After the conclusion of the Gauls sacking Rome, Rome became obsessed with the security of their empire and acutely aware of any and all potential threats. “Following the sack by the Gauls, the Romans were frightened by strong neighbors and sometimes made preemptive strikes against peoples they believed were becoming too powerful” (Kidner, 129). Rome became a walled city that would not let any foreign soldiers through its gates from the conclusion of the sacking in 390 B.C. until 410 A.D., earning it the nickname of the Eternal City. The Roman mantra of Lex Fetiale, which prohibited Rome from going to war unless under siege or asked for assistance, was suddenly much easier to justify than before.
Moreover, to enhance his mind to join the conspiracy, he said that Caesar is just an ordinary man by giving specific instances that showed Caesar is as ordinary as others e.g. Caesar cried out to help him when he was about to drowned if Cassius and that Caesar was an epileptic. Showing their weakness is fatal especially if the person is a leader because if the leader shows the weak si...
In this play, Cassius’ motivation is completely inspired by evil and hatred. His jealousy of Caesar and greed for power drives him to create the conspiracy and start plotting the death of Caesar. While talking to Casca, he says, “What trash is Rome, / What rubbish and what offal, when is serves / For the bas matter to illuminate / So vile a thing as Caesar!” (I.iii.109-112). This shows some of the true feelings Cassius has about Caesar. He believes that Caesar is not worthy of his power and does not want anyone to hold more power than him. Although he justifies the killing of Caesar as an act for freedom from tyranny, his motivation is full of bad intent. In an attempt to disguise his true motives, Cassius convinces Brutus, an honorable and well-respected man, to join the conspiracy. He tells Brutus, “Brutus and Caesar-what should be in that “Caesar”? / Why should that name be sounded more than yours? / Write them together, yours is as fair a name. / Sound them, it doth become the mouth as well. / ...
THESIS STATEMENT: The assassination of Julius Caesar was due to his increased power and the Senate's fear of losing their political relevance. PURPOSE STATEMENT: Through critical analysis and research, it has been shown that Caesar's gain in power worried the Senate. INTRODUCTION: On July 13, 100 B.C., Gaius Julius Caesar was born into a family that was proud of being patrician.
Cicero wrote mostly about Verres’ failings in Sicily while Publius Rupilius and Manius Aquillius attempted to save Sicily from complete destruction. Cicero wrote, “Is not Verres’ entire treatment of Sicily of such a kind that even if Athenion himself, the king of the fugitive slaves, had won the war, he would not have acted this way?”. In another passage, Cicero stated, “And during the war with the fugitive slaves, Manius Aquillius even had to make loans of cereal grain to the cities of Sicily”. Cicero essentially ‘bashed’ Verres and his treatment of Sicily and how much turmoil it had created, having left no one unaffected, including Manius Aquillius who had helped defeat the Second Servile
Ambition drives Caesar to become a strong leader of Rome. Caesar works hard and consequently is given power, but in the process makes many enemies