Abraham Lincoln and Julius Caesar are undoubtedly two men who made history by and through their governance on their own nations. When making comparison of these two great men, one significant feature or mode of comparison is their assassination. Comparing Julius Caesar’s assassination to that of Abraham Lincoln shows both differences and similarities. In either case, the Roman General and the U.S. President were killed by people who were threatened by their authority and power. The life of Julius Caesar is comparable to the life of Abraham Lincoln in a variety of ways. While unique similarities exist in the lives of these two men, distinct differences also exist. Abraham Lincoln was an orator; Julius Caesar a notable author of Latin prose. They were both leaders. Nowadays, people look up to them as heroes. They shared a significant amount of power in their respective nations. Both men were assassinated. Although a little similar, the manner of assassination of Julius Caesar was quite different from that of Abraham Lincoln. The Roman leader and the U.S. President both came from a different era; their backgrounds were also different. Gaius Julius Caesar was born in Rome in July 100 BC. Rome was a Republic at this time. He was a statesman, Roman general, Consul, and notable author of Latin prose. He played a significant role in the events that led to the collapse of the Roman Republic and rise of the Roman Empire. He was a leader in a nation where the people were not involved in the government decision-making process. Thus, he had majority of the power in the Republic and was able to form a huge army. He was able to triumph, conquer new lands with the army at his grasp and command. As Caesar acquired more power over the years, som... ... middle of paper ... ...be used to compare these two men; however, their assassination by people opposed to their use of power is the ultimate method of comparison. Abraham Lincoln was assassinated because of his backing for equality and end of slavery. His deed was gallant and honourable; however the nation at the time was not too keen on embracing such a change. Conversely, Julius Caesar’s assassination stemmed from his abuse of power and office. Works Cited Parissien, Steven. Assassinated!: Assassinations That Shook the World, from Julius Caesar to Lincoln. London: Quercus, 2008. Print. Furtwangler, Albert. Assassin on Stage: Brutus, Hamlet, and the Death of Lincoln. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2007. Print. Alvin B. Kernan. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. Print. Morse, John T. Abraham Lincoln. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 2005. Print.
Plutarch. "The Assassination of Julius Caesar, from Marcus Brutus (excerpts)." Translated by John Dryden. Reproduced by Internet Ancient History Sourcebook. August 2000. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/plutarch-caesar.asp (accessed 26 January 2014).
Julius Ceaser was a ignorant but noble man. But what person can we compare him to in todays world. I think that man is JFK. This two men have a lot in common but they are also different in their own way. Today I am going to tell you some of those differences and a likes between these two noble men.
The assassination of Julius Caesar was due to his increased power and the senate’s fear of losing their political relevance.
Caesar and Brutus have many differences and many similarities. Some of their similarities are personal and some of them are not. Their differences are the same way, some are personal and some are not. Some similarities are going to be very close, and some will be barely related to the other person. This essay is going to explain how Caesar and Brutus are similar, and how they are not similar.
Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln made history through their leadership journey on their land. When comparing Caesar and Lincoln, one detail comes to mind, and that is their assassination. Therefore, comparing the murder of an American president to that of a Roman politician and general discloses each similarity and dissimilarity. Eventually, the crucial comparison between both is the assassinations. People disagreed with Caesar and Lincoln in how they carried out and used their authority and power.
Julius Caesar and Czar Nicholas II have several things in common, but they are different at the same time.
Julius Caesar is remembered as one of the greatest military minds in history and credited with arranging the basis for the Roman Empire. Caesar’s military brilliance bought Rome more land and more power, which led into the increase of size and strength of Rome. Caesar’s dictatorship helped the strength in Rome. Julius Caesar was assassinated which lead to a monarchy that was ruled by Octavin. Caesar’s death caused an effect to the collapse of the Roman Empire. Many people today in the 21st century try and follow the greatness of Julius Caesar. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a tragedy with the contributions Caesar made to strengthen Rome’s success.
Shakespeare’s complex play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar contains several tragic heroes; a tragic hero holds high political or social esteem yet possesses an obvious character flaw. This discernible hubris undoubtedly causes the character’s demise or a severe forfeiture, which forces the character to undergo an unfeigned moment of enlightenment and shear reconciliation. Brutus, one of these tragic heroes, is a devout friend of the great Julius Caesar, that is, until he makes many execrable decisions he will soon regret; he becomes involved in a plot to kill the omniscient ruler of Rome during 44 B.C. After committing the crime, Mark Antony, an avid, passionate follower of Caesar, is left alive under Brutus’s orders to take his revenge on the villains who killed his beloved Caesar. After Antony turns a rioting Rome on him and wages war against him and the conspirators, Brutus falls by his own hand, turning the very sword he slaughtered Caesar with against himself. Brutus is unquestionably the tragic hero in this play because he has an innumerable amount of character flaws, he falls because of these flaws, and then comes to grips with them as he bleeds on the planes of Philippi.
Julius Caesar came to power when Rome was a republic. He shaped Rome in enumerable ways. He was a charismatic public speaker and won the love of the people by focusing on helping the poor and looking after his soldiers with appointments and property. One of his most substantial contributions to Rome was his skill as a General. His brilliance allowed him to win many military campaigns and expand Rome’s territory. His talents made him a rich and popular man in Rome but this was a threat to conservatives in Rome. Ultimately, his
Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther king Jr. both have many similarities and differences. Abraham Lincoln had many great accomplishments (Abraham Lincoln 2014). Martin Luther King also, did as well (Foundation 2014). Abraham Lincoln had quite the working life as a child, before he became president (Website ). However, Martin Luther King’s childhood was very different from Lincoln’s (book). However, these men became some of the greatest leaders this country has ever had.
The Roman Republic has acted as a model for most Western countries and some empires have even tried to name themselves the heirs to this powerful empire. One of the most famous plays about this ancient empire describes the death of Julius Caesar, a well known general dictator of Rome. As we all know, Caesar was murdered by the Roman Senate in order to terminate his dictatorship. The play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, was written by William Shakespeare and includes two speeches which are analyzed frequently for their rhetorical appeals and figurative language. One speech is given by Mark Antony while the other was given by Brutus. Both of the speakers were close friends of Caesar and delivered effective speeches using powerful rhetorical
Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) was one of the most outstanding leaders in history. He was the first ruler of the Romano-Hellenic civilization and achieved his goals with great success throughout his life of 56 years. He was assassinated by the conspirators, who accused him for practicing tyranny. This essay will discuss whether it was right for the conspirators to murder Caesar and what its consequences were.
The similarities between them is they both truly care about Rome and its people, they both are seen as a very noble by the people of Rome, and they respect each other. Their similarities also has some differences between them as Caesar wants to rule Rome as king as the event which he went to the senate even though he was warned several times but Brutus doesn’t think it’s great for Rome to have a king as he joined the conspiracist
Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln have many similarities and differences. They both undeniably made history within their lifetimes. When comparing the two one thing in their history comes to mind, their assassination. The assassinations are similar based on the fact that they were done by people who disagreed with Caesar’s and Lincoln’s ideas of ruining their countries. They were both in very different time periods, but they are still similar in reason.
There have been four presidents that have been assassinated. Along with Lincoln and Kennedy, James Garfield and William McKinley were also assassinated as presidents. Lincoln and Kennedy are the two that are the most similar and are missed and talked about the most out of the four. Both men were heroes of their time and both were greatly respected and revered by most of the nation they led. Although Lincoln was born into poor home and Kennedy was born into the political world, they were able to accomplish many great things while they were in office. They were both reelected for another term but were then killed on November 8th exactly one century later. Although these men are dead they are still greatly missed by those that loved them.