Analysis Of Black Lives Matter

1143 Words3 Pages

In “The Truth about Black Lives Matter,” the editorial board argues that the Republican Party casts the "Black Lives Matter" movement as a hateful anti-white expression. This movement has been the result of wildly executed "state sanctioned violence", as well, as "racial terror" on individuals of the black community. According to the original editorial, The Republican Party deems the “Black Lives Matter” movement as “inflammatory” and “anti-white”. However, it is only when events such as the killing of Treyvon Martin and Michael Brown along with the vindication of their killers occur that we experience the rise of this movement. This goes to show that the movement was ultimately generated from a sense of injustice toward said victim’s deaths, as well, as to black individuals as a coherent body, rather than from a source of hate for white individuals. The board suggests that the intent of this demeaning campaign by these individuals has been to convince the phrase "Black Lives Matter is a hateful statement that has no legitimate place in the civil rights campaign." However, the phrase "Black …show more content…

The Republican Party and people in opposition have tried to paint all respects of this movement in a bad light. However, when one perceives of what “Black Lives Matter” is ultimately based on, it becomes evident that it executes positive ideas and morally upstanding vitality into the public as a way of demanding a radical change. Nonetheless, as senses of “racism” and “hate” continue to bombard this movement, it will always be seen as something negative, so the ultimate conclusion has to be a change of heart and mind. A change that will not only accept the underlying cry for justice and freedom of the “Black Lives Matter” movement, but one that will also contribute to everyone valuing a black life as much as they do their

Open Document