The Arab world at its height, stood united as one nation. It was in the 9th and 16th century during the Abbasid Empire and the Ottoman Empire’s reign that the arts and sciences flourished in the Arab lands. The Arab world changes dramatically as it degenerates from a strong, united force to a weakened and fragmented state ruled by misguided individuals. Some Arabs became self-aware of their decline as they saw the loss of territories that were historically held to the Europeans. The decline sparked movements that saw people wanting to return or recreate the past glorious and prosperous as it was. Two notable thinkers by the names of Jamal ad-Din al-Afghani and Michel Aflaq developed methods and ideas that would help the Arab world reach that goal and express them in “Commentary on the Commentator” and “Nationalism and Revolution” respectively. Although the goal of revitalizing and reunifying the Arabs are the same, both Afghani and Aflaq have conflicting notions on what role the Arabs should play and choose to pursue different ideas based on this.
Afghani and Aflaq’s arguments are divergent from the start on account of the differences between how and what transformed the glorious Arab world into a former shell of itself. The what has already been established as corruption; it is a common ground that they both agree is the cause of the problems in the Middle East. Both arguments realize that corruption works to destabilize the Arab state but they disagree on how it happened. Aflaq asserts that the decline comes from the people themselves. The people had become content during the years of high stability; there was no reason to change society and so it became stagnant. It led society to, as Aflaq writes, “[sink] to a low level, being...
... middle of paper ...
...ecause they are also sufferers of the decline. It becomes necessary to unify the Arab nation because it will allow the reforms to begin. The two arguments would never have had the chance of being the same as Afghani and Aflaq regarded humans differently.
Works Cited
Aflaq, Michel. “Nationalism and Revolution.” Fi sabil al-ba’th. Beirut: n.p., 1959. 242-249. Print.
Al-Afghani, Jamal ad-Din. “Commentary on the Commentator.” An Islamic Response to Imperialism. N.p.: n.p., n.d. 123-129. Print.
Cleveland, William L., and Martin Bunton. History of the Modern Middle East. 5th ed. N.p.: Westview, 2012. Print.
Gettleman, Marvin E. The Middle East and Islamic World Reader. Revised and Expanded ed. New York: Grove, 2012. Print.
Sedra, Paul. “Islamic Reform”. History 151. Simon Fraser University. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby,
B.C. 23 Sept. 2013. Class Lecture.
Ansary, Mir Tamim. Destiny Disrupted: A History of the World through Islamic Eyes. New York: PublicAffairs, 2009. Print.
Ibn Munqidh, Usama. "From Memoirs." McNeill, William and Marilyn Robinson Waldman. The Islamic World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973. 184-206.
In the novel War and Peace In the Middle East, author Avi Shlaim argues that Arab nations have been unable to escape the post-Ottoman syndrome. In particular he describes how the various powers inside and outside the region have failed to produce peace. While some of Shlaim's arguments hinder the message, I agree with his overall thesis that the Middle East problems were caused and prolonged by the failure of both powers and superpowers to take into account the regional interests of the local states.
Print. Doak, Robin. Empire of the Islamic World. Rev. ed.
Hassan, Nafaa. "ARAB NATIONALISM: A RESPONSE TO AJAMI'S THESIS ON THE "END OF PAN-ARABISM." Journal of Arab Affairs 2.2 (1983): n. pag. ProQuest. Web. 21 Feb. 2014.
Lewis, Bernard. The Middle East: A Brief History of the Last 2,000 Years. New York: Scribner,
Early 2011 uprisings swept across the Middle East and North Africa, and many rebellions are still going on today. The Arab region has seen revolts and conflict since the 1800‘s, but only recently have these revolts been redirected to the problems of Arab society (Ghannam, J. 2011 pg 4-5)The Arab Spring Uprising was first sparked in Tunisia and eventually struck Algeria, Jordan, Egypt, Yemen and then spread to other countries. Citizens throughout these countries were dissatisfied with the rule of their local governments. Issues like human rights violations, political corruption, economic decline, unemployment, extreme poverty, dictators...
The author exposes how the American and Arabs cultures met and interacted. It is clear that the Arab people did not comprehend the changes they would face. Furthermore, the Americans had to adapt but somehow still overcome religion and tradition. Consequently, the beginning of the oil era brought financial wealth but for the greater part brought painful changes to Arab societies. It is difficult to understand how oil wealth did not completely modernize the Middle East for a greater good. Instead we know about the real situation in both the novel and the real Arab culture and how oil money paired with retroactive empires, old religious beliefs and self-absorbed Western governments took over.
G. Hossein. “Legitimacy, Religion, and Nationalism in the Middle East.” The American Political Science Review, Volume 84, Issue 1 (1990. 3), 69-91.
Orientalism as termed by Edward Said is meant to create awareness of a constellation of assumptions that are flawed and underlying Western attitudes towards the Muslim societies. Evidence from his 1978 book “Orientalism”, states that the culture has been of influence and marred with controversy in post colonial studies and other fields of study. Moreover, the scholarship is surrounded by somehow persistent and otherwise subtle prejudice of Eurocentric nature, which is against Islam religion and culture (Windschuttle, 1999). In his book, Said illustrates through arguments, that the long tradition in existence containing romanticized images of Islamic stronghold regions i.e. Middle East, and the Western culture have for a long time served as implicit justifications for the European and American Imperial ambitions. In light of this, Said denounced the practice of influential Arabs who contributed to the internalization of Arabic culture ideas by US and British orientalists. Thus, his hypothesis that Western scholarship on Muslim was historically flawed and essentially continues to misrepresent the reality of Muslim people. In lieu to this, Said quotes that, “So far as the United States seems to be concerned, it is only a slight overstatement to say that Muslims and Arabs are essentially seen as either oil suppliers or potential terrorists. Therefore, very few details such as human density, the passion of Arab-Muslim life has entered the awareness of even the people whose profession revolve around reporting of the Arab world. Due to this, we have instead a series of crude, essentialized caricatures of the Islamic world presented in such a way as to make that world vulnerable to military aggression” (Said, 1980).
The article, “Why Is There So Much Conflict in the Middle East?” written by Mirjam E. Sørli et. al corresponds a great deal with the text Politics and Change in the Middle East as far as the reasons for conflict in the Middle East. Sørli et. al disputes the idea of “Middle East exceptionalism,” which says that there is something different about Middle Easterners that make them prone to violence and conflict (142). Sørli et. al says this is not true, but rather there are very simple reasons as to why there has been conflict in the Middle East. As stated, the lack of regional natural resources such as water, oil, and arable la...
Thomas W. Lippman gives an introduction to the Muslim world in the book Understanding Islam. He has traveled throughout the Islamic world as Washington Post bureau chief for the Middle East, and as a correspondent in Indochina. This gave him, in his own words, "sharp insight into the complexities of that turbulent region." However, the purpose of the book is not to produce a critical or controversial interpretation of Islamic scripture. It is instead to give the American layman an broad understanding of a religion that is highly misunderstood by many Americans. In this way he dispels many myths about "Muslim militants," and the otherwise untrue perception of Islamic violence. In this way the American reader will become more knowledgeable about an otherwise unfamiliar topic. However, the most significant element of Lippman’s book is that it presents Islam in a simple way that makes the reader feels his awareness rise after each chapter. This encourages him to continue learning about the world’s youngest major religion. Understanding Islam dispels many misconceptions about the Muslim world, and presents the subject in a way that urges his reader to further his understanding of Islam through continued study.
Gerner, Deborah J., and Philip A. Schrodt. "Middle Eastern Politics." Understanding the contemporary Middle East. 3rd ed. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2008. 85 -136. Print.
...nd Politics." Encyclopedia of the Modern Middle East and North Africa. Ed. Philip Mattar. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2004. 890-895. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 24 Jan. 2012.
G. Esposito, John L (2002) Islam; What Everyone Should Know. New York. Oxford University Press Inc.