Integrative Approach Case Study

2166 Words5 Pages

This integrative approach focuses mainly on four approaches: psychoanalytic, Adlerian, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and the postmodern approaches. The main focus is on CBT and how psychoanalytic, Adlerian and the postmodern approaches build on this integrative approach. In this integrative approach, the problem at hand is a client dealing with depression. I chose CBT as the main approach because the cognitive thought pattern is an important key for a client and CBT can branch out to other approaches, without interfering with the key concepts. Freud’s psychoanalytic theory is an approach, which other approaches has sprung from. However, Freud’s theory has aspects to it, which I would not use in counseling. Nevertheless, other theories …show more content…

By going from a teaching aspect to an approach where the client becomes the expert might cause confusing to the client instead of helping covering multiple aspects of the problem. A problem that might occur would be the fact that the counselor does not maintain a basic role but changes depending on which of the four approaches that are emphasized at the time. Further, it might be confusing for the counselor to intertwine all four approaches without confusing oneself and knowing which one to emphasize the most. These relationship issues might be hard to handle for a new counselor who needs more training to master the integrated approach to perfection. If a client is depressed, it might vary on what approach that is most likely to help the client recover, which can be difficult to determine when multiple approaches are in …show more content…

The client might have had an event that would activate different thought-patterns, which could lead to an irrational belief, leading to a consequence. For the client with the depression, the client might have had felt isolated by friends in the stage of the early adulthood, which led to an irrational belief about the friends disliking the client, leading to the consequence of the client withdrawing from social activates. The A-B-C theory emphasizes changing the thought-pattern this irrational belief has caused, by disputing an intervention, which would lead to an effective philosophy, which eventually would lead to a new feeling. For the client suffering from depression, disputing intervention might include talking about whether the friends were actually isolating the client or if that was an irrational belief. Confronting the issue could lead to effective philosophy where the client would realize that it was an irrational belief that the friends were excluding the client, which would lead to a new feeling where the client would not withdraw from social activates (Corey, 2015). For the psychosocial perspective, Erikson’s psychosocial stages can create a diagnosing effect while confronting the root of the issue and solving the crisis. Intertwining Erikson’s psychosocial stages with the phenomenological

Open Document