The Principles Of Freedom Of An Individual

857 Words2 Pages

Introduction
The principle of freedom of an individual is the core tenet of liberalism. The foundation of liberalism is categorized into three. The first is the freedom from arbitrary rule, termed “negative freedom” which includes freedom of the press, equality before the law, freedom of conscience and right to property. The second set of rights ensures the protection and promotion of the capacity and opportunity for freedom, which is called the “positive freedom.” Example of such rights are the social and economic rights to health care, education, gainful employment, for human dignity and participation in the society. Thirdly, political rights of democratic representation or participation i.e right to vote or be voted for to ensure that the other two rights are not infringed upon (Kant & Political Philosophy, 1993. p. 173).
Liberalism today could slightly be different from earlier views as a result of changes in time and history however the fundamental tent of liberty and the ideals of freedom, equality, independence as expressed by Kant remains the same and paramount.

He was an eighteenth-century philosopher during a period dominated by the ideas of the Enlightenment. He was heavily influenced by Jean-Jacque Rousseau…. His first philosophical writing was the Critique of Pure Reason published in 1781. Kant view of freedom is the independence of one from the constraint of another’s will

Kant was more concerned with the establishment of a republican government that respects the political rights of all men to live in a just and peaceful society. If we are to achieve peace, we must focus our effort towards ensuring that we identify our shared identity for peace and equality. We must also believe in the noumenal reality.
His ...

... middle of paper ...

...mony in preparation for any such occurrence creating unnecessary tension in the world society. It is stated that there are approximately 15,700 nuclear warheads worldwide, around which 4,300 of them are considered to be operational and 1,800 are ready for immediate use (FAS.org, September 28, 2015). His however not a pacifist, he admitted that war for the sake of freedom is justifiable. He strongly criticised the concept of balance of power stressing that it does not guarantee perpetual peace. The combination of forces by two or more states against a mutual enemy state is according to him a violation of right. He dismisses utilitarianism noting that rulers should not take actions that make their citizens happy; happiness is subjective. Every decision should come as a result of reason which would allow the subject pursue happiness on their own terms (ibid., p. 25).

Open Document