More handpicked essays just for you.
Communication strengths and weakness
Communication strengths and weakness
Communication strengths and weakness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Exercise 1:
First, please describe your preferred communication style based on the test that you just took. What surprised you?
The test relating to my communication style revealed I am a Conventional communicator. I would have to say that I would agree with the explanation of the style and see myself fitting into the category most of the time, particularly in the work place. I do feel with certain situations I can be an expressive communicator, especially when trying to get my point of view across in an argument, or giving advice to a friend. I could see myself as a strategic communicator at times when talking to patients. I would have to change my style of words into words they could understand better, like medical jargon into layman’s terms. As a whole though, more times than not, I see myself fitting into the conventional guidelines below.
Most leaders are Conventionals. If you are a Conventional, you generally are already a good communicator. Understanding the principles of framing will help you to be seen as an even more effective communicator and leader (Fairhurst, 2011).
Conventionals have some sensitivity to the idea of framing because they generally follow the rules for communicating with
…show more content…
This manager will want to make all the decisions and not want to hear other options from the team or staff. This will make working rather difficult and unbearable at times. The first thing I can do is try my hardest to gain this persons trust. I would alter my communication style to be slightly more expressive. In my dealings with this manager I would try to get right to the point, and be firm but also polite. I don’t want the manager to think I am challenging them. Perhaps they will see I mean business and don’t want to make small talk with them. Hopefully the manager will come around to respecting me for that and deal with me in a more of a democratic leadership style when it comes to engaging with
Communication is a two-way process which involves the conveyance of information from a source to a recipient be it an individual or a group. Based upon The Kiersey Temperament Test taken earlier this week, I am an ISFJ which is basically an introvert personality style with reflective communication style (The Kiersey Temperament Test, n.d.). In this memo I will discuss my ISJF personality style and how it affects my writing. I will also present any things I might do things I might do to improve my writing style, and also, how my personality relates to my communication style.
This Communications Style Inventory provided an accurate reflection of my communication style for the majority of the time. I would argue my communication style is dependent on the situation. When I communicate with students, I tend to take on the role of supporter/relator. I listen to their problems and tailor my reactions to their emotions. When I am with friends, I am a promoter/socializer. I still value building those relationships, but they often do not require the emotional support the students need. Although controller and Analyzer are my lease score traits, I do use those qualities when I need to be direct or need to work by myself.
Knowing that audience members create ideas about their world based on one or more of the terms of the pentad, burke theorizes that persuaders can use language to structure the world view of audience members (Brochers 197). A persuader can focus on the terms of the pentad that would be favorable to his or her persuasive goals (Brochers 197).
The most recent full explication of frames and framing effects comes from Bertram and Dietram Scheufele (2010), and serves to define what frames are, what they do, how they do it, and where they come from. However, it is lacking a predictive model for when effects will occur. Adding this level to the framing model will greatly expand the ability of researchers to accurately measure the effects of framing on individual cognitions and will at least in part fulfil the call of Scheufele and Scheufele (2010) to integrate disparate sociological and psychological theories into our understanding of framing (p. 131). This literature synthesis draws upon recent research to show that the occurrence of framing effects may be dependent upon the processing strategy utilized by the message receiver (Stewart, 2013).
Management styles often change when new managers become experienced managers. How a person chooses to use their experience often depends on the positions that they chose to take on. The average younger baby boomer has held 11 jobs by the time they had turned 44 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010). These changes will often force a person to be different type of manager from when they first started. Pete Torrez (Torrez) has had multiple jobs that have led to a varied career path. He has had to adapt to make sure the communication techniques he is using are appropriate for the audience that he is addressing. The communication styles have been developed because of the career choices he has made and the people that he has associated with in the workplace. The communication style has used and is using is because of the positions he has held. Nonverbal and written communications are an important piece to how he has been able to continue growth in all his positions and career path. Influence of technology has had a great impact on how he has had to communicate with peers and employees, and as a Baby Boomer there have also been challenges. As a teacher in junior high education and manager in retail, the power of persuasion and conflict resolution has been used consistently. Although a strong communicator in many ways, there are recommendations that could help him progress and be a strong communicator.
By reducing anxiety, this makes the communication and interaction more effective. If a high level of uncertainty remains, that leads to anxiety and people may completely avoid the interaction and communication. One’s communication style may assist with reducing uncertainty in these interactions. Jim McCroskey and Virginia Richmond detail two types of communication style or “sociocommunicative orientation” that affect how one interacts and communicates in situations (Neulip, 2015). These two communication styles are assertiveness and responsiveness. Assertiveness is a style that one is active and asks questions, make requests, express positive or negative feelings, initiate and sustain or terminate conversations, and practice self-defense without being attacking. Responsiveness refers to the communicative style in which one is more sensitive to communication of others, a good listener that engages in comforting communication and recognizes the needs of others during the interaction (Neulip, 2015). These sociocommunicative orientations are not necessarily a “good” or “bad” thing, however, they are associated with reduced uncertainty during initial cross-cultural interactions (Neulip, 2015). These styles also vary from culture to culture. For instance, American men and women scored higher on the assertiveness dimension than Japanese men and women (Neulip,
The communication style is that portray me is the self-assured style. Consequently, I have confidence in accomplishing objectives without harming others, ensure my own particular rights and regard different rights, tolerating and offering compliments to my representatives, put belief in myself as well as other people, amazing relational abilities, and rouse others. Assertive correspondence is conceived of high self-regard. It is the most beneficial and best style of correspondence the sweet spot between being excessively forceful and excessively aloof. When we are self-assured, we have the certainty to impart without turning to recreations or control. We know our cutoff points and don't permit ourselves to be pushed
For this report I will be studying the key communication concepts and analyses the responses and develop actions for improvement to my self. I will start with the explanations and identities of my personal style within listening and responding & Emotional Intelligence as well as make some references to these communication dimensions. Also in the report would be provided an interview to my friends to meet information about my communication style from different perspective. Then report will finish by myself-reflection to the response and develop actions for improvement.
... Communication is one of the most intricate and under looked areas of human beings. By completing this assignment I learned a great detail about my self and how others perceive me. Though I do feel that I am an a good communicator I now realize what aspects of my communications skills that I need to fix the problem. The areas I would like to change are to try to be more open with others.
It is very important to understand that in everyday communication we are either the speaker or listener and it’s important that we do those jobs as best we can in order to have a healthy communication relationship. This activity was very useful because I got to reflect on my past successes and failures in my communicating strategies and in doing so I can improve and adapt to become a better communicator and listener. I believe that this assignment is very useful because it is real life experiences that may occur again and I can better assess the situation and use the appropriate communicating strategy necessary. This reflection will help me in my personal development by giving me situational experience that I will be able to correctly approach in and out of the
Prior Knowledge my knowledge about effective communication was limited and I did know much about “what is the most effective way of communicating “with a person. Thought the lecturer i have known more about, importance of communication anywhere, whether it’s in an organization or with someone outside. Moreover, later i was able to pin point the difference
Assertive communication style describes the communicator who makes his point in a direct and clear manner. The speaker achieves it with a strong and firm voice without any counterproductive and unnecessary fillers, such as “ahs” and “ums” (Hopkins). This way, the listener is left with no doubt of what the speaker is stating and the reasons behind what is being said. Aggressive communication style, on the other hand, is common for the communicators who use a tone that is deemed by the audienc that in some cases personal, resulting in unnecessary conflict. Individuals who use this style in most cases are poor listeners and always want things to go their way.
I have a probing communication style. When I am face to face with people I often forget material I wanted to mention if it is not written down. My listening skills are good. When I am talking, if I am permitted to lead the conversation my listening skills suffer. However, if the other person does most of the talking I listen fairly well.
One of the main aspects in communicating is listening. An effective listener is one who, not only comprehends how the speaker feels but, also understands what they are stating. Building a strong connection between the speaker and the listener is one of the first steps to become a good listener. By building this connection speakers should first be in an environment with open minded listeners, it makes them feel more comfortable to state their opinions, feelings and ideas. Listeners should avoid being judgmental. The individual does not have to agree with the ideas, values or opinions of the speaker; however, to fully understand them, one must put aside their criticism. Speakers will believe that they can trust the listeners with their information when they know that they will not be judged. Miscommunication happens frequently, listene...
As in all aspects of personal and professional life, having effective communication is a key element of success. Effective communication can benefit your relationships with people. By conveying your message and integrating them as a member of the team and not just a subordinate leads to better production. By effectively communicating you can clearly define job responsibilities and expectations. The better you are able to communicate the less likely organizational turnover of personnel will occur. Supervisors and leaders in the professional workplace find that the most important factor in advancement and retain ability is effective communication. Senior level executives and human resources managers are stressing the importance of communication and providing more training for mid-level management. Emphasis is placed on communication being clear by being transmitted strongly.