Perodua Case Study

828 Words2 Pages

In 1993, the Malaysian Government established another national car manufacturing company called Perodua (Perusahaan Otomobil Kedua Sdn Bhd) to support its local auto industry before the start of the ASEAN (The Association of Southeast Asian Nations) Free Trade Area (AFTA). Paired, together, Proton and Perodua rule much of the Malaysian car market. Proton and Perodua has been at each other’s heels since the beginning of time. Perodua was able to outsold Proton in monthly sales by 99 cars on the December 2006. This had shaken Proton undoubtedly, but at the same time awaken Perodua that it had the opportunity to outperform the national giant carmaker and replace its placement in public image. Ever since then, Perodua’s vendors and dealers collaborated …show more content…

This spells concern for the Proton brand as it no longer has any importance in the automotive industry. Enhanced innovation by its competitors like Naza Kia or Perodua has injured Proton’s brand. Instead, the reduced level of brand awareness has contributed to its declining sales in the automotive market. In a prospering economic situation in Malaysia, labour charges are comparatively affordable for Proton. With an increase in unemployment rate, Proton should not have any problem in hiring suitable labour force for their manufacturing plants located in both Tanjung Malim and Shah …show more content…

With this in mind, from 1997, Proton began preparing to equip themselves by boosting its Research & Development (R&D) capabilities. Currently thanks to rigorous R&D, it is a fully fledged automotive manufacturer capable of designing and producing its own car platforms, bodies and engines. However, at this time when most car manufacturers are quickly moving into hybrid engines, Proton had just made its first combustion engine and there would always be a hiccup in the technology used by Proton from its first predecessor engine technology i.e. Mitsubishi up to the current Campro engine, built in-house with Lotus touch. For an example, many Gen2 owners complained that the cars had a dragging acceleration. This puts Proton into a situation that frames the lack of an up to date technology to boost the car to a satisfactory pick up level. With the weight of Waja Campro (1205kg) and even the latest Exora (1422 kg), heavier than Gen2 (1190kg), this problem is more pertinent causing a slow drive as driver had to rev pretty high all the time to get decent

More about Perodua Case Study

Open Document