Why Is The Big Bang Theory Wrong

1620 Words4 Pages

Are the Big Bang Theory and Nebular Hypothesis correct?

Over the years, science has reached new levels of advancement and many scientific laws have been established in order to explain the way our universe functions. Using these laws, many scientists have come up with promising explanations for the formation of the universe and our Solar System. The Big Bang Theory, for example, explains that at one point in time, the entire universe was inside a tiny bubble hotter and denser than anything we could imagine. Suddenly, the bubble exploded and the universe was born. Over time, it began to grow from smaller than a single atom to an entire galaxy, and it is still expanding today. First suggested by physicist and priest Georges Lemaître, it is the …show more content…

In fact, to call this concept merely a theory is to underestimate the overwhelming amount of evidence. There is also a hypothesis designed to explain the formation of our Solar System. This idea, proposed by Pierre Simon de Laplace in 1976, is known as the Nebular Hypothesis and states that the material from which the solar system was formed was once a slowly rotating cloud, known as a nebula, of extremely hot gas. The gas cooled and the nebula began to shrink. As the nebula became smaller, it rotated more rapidly, becoming slightly flattened at the poles. A combination of centrifugal force and gravitational force caused rings of gas to be left behind as the nebula shrank. These rings condensed into planets and their satellites, while the remaining part of the nebula formed the sun. While much progress has been made in determining the exact formation of the Universe and Solar System, these two widely accepted …show more content…

According to the Big Bang theory, many of the elements that we see today were created as the universe expanded and cooled down. In the earliest moments after the explosion, there was nothing more than hydrogen compressed into a minute volume of high heat and pressure. The theory suggests that the universe was acting like the core of a star, combining hydrogen into helium and many other elements. This concept has become known as Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, and has been supported by the fact that many astronomers have looked out into the universe, measured the ratios of hydrogen, helium and other trace elements, only to find that they match the ratios they would expect to find if the entire Universe was truthfully once a big

Open Document