Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the ethical implications of gene therapy
Is genetic modification ethical
Ethical issues of gene therapy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the ethical implications of gene therapy
Have you ever wondered what it would be like to be able to choose your own characteristics, or even get rid of unwanted ones? Although at first, this may seem like the main idea of a cliche science fiction novel, it is, in fact, a current controversy known as gene editing. Gene editing is a widespread possibility for the future. The hope is that one day scientists will be capable of changing the genes in human embryos to remove dangerous inherited diseases. Despite the clearly positive results of healthier children, people are split on whether or not it’s actually beneficial. Some argue that it’s unsafe and that we don’t know if it has negative effects that could end up doing more harm than good. On the other side, some believe that if we …show more content…
In the article “Despite moral objections, panel gives cautious approval to gene editing research” by Eva Botkin- Kowack, it says, “There are thousands of genetic diseases- gene editing could be a huge help for these people and deserves some consideration.” This is true because we will greatly improve the lives of many by allowing them to rid themselves and their children the burden of having, or even carrying, a genetic disease. In the text, it also states it can “treat a range of diseases such a sickle cell, hemophilia, to even lowering risks of certain cancers.” This shows us more specifically some of the viruses that could be gone just by genetic editing. We have access to curing diseases, which is too great of an opportunity to pass up. If society can save lives, why shouldn’t …show more content…
In the article written by Eva Botkin-Kowacki, she states “fears have persisted that such technology could lead to a dystopian society in which people with the means could pay to alter the traits of their offspring to give them an advantage in life, or governments might use the technique to build super-soldiers.” What this means to them is that it could get out of hand. Those who say this are short-sighted. If we set strict regulations and guidelines now to ensure that gene editing remains only for getting rid of diseases, there is no concern for superhumans whatsoever. This idea is shown by Project Syndicate when it says “The sick should not be left untreated just because of fears that some parents will want to build superkids.” Besides, this situation presented by those anti-gene editing is merely hypothetical, not fact-based by any
SUMMARY: Director of the Ethics Institute, Ronald M. Green, in his article “Building Baby from the Genes Up” discusses why he thinks that genetically modifying babies genes is more beneficial than destructive. He begins his article off by mentioning a story of a couple who wishe to genetically modify their baby so that they could make sure the baby would not develop the long family line of breast cancer. Green then notifies the reader that no matter where they stand on the matter, genetically modifying babies is going to become more and more popular. Even the National Institute of Health is beginning to invest in technology that can be used to genetically modify human genes. He then explains how genetically modifying human genes can be beneficial,
It will then inform the reader of the effects it will have on our society. Diseases like cancer, AIDS, cardiovascular disease, cystic fibrosis and Alzheimer’s could potentially be cured (American Medical Association). However, serious risks can be associated with gene therapy. If a gene is added to the DNA, there is a possibility it may be inserted in the wrong place, which can lead to other harmful effects (Gene Therapy and Children). However, it also has the ability to positively affect patients lives.
Many people often ask, “Is it acceptable for human beings to manipulate human genes” (Moral and Ethical Issues in Gene Therapy). Most of the ethical issues centralize on the Christian understanding of a human being. They believe God made them the way they are and people should accept their fate.The Society, Religion and Technology Project have researched and found that countless people are curious if gene therapy is the right thing to do. They have a problem with exploiting the genes a person is born with due to the fact they consider it to be “playing God” (Moral and Ethical Issues in Gene Therapy). They are also concerned with the safety. On account of the unfamiliar and inexperienced technology. Gene therapy has only been around since 1990, so scientists are still trying to find the best possible way to help cure these diseases. Multiple scientists are cautious with whom they share their research. For the reason that if it were to get into in the wrong hands it could conceivably start a superhuman race. Author Paul Recer presumes using germline engineering to cure fatal diseases or even to generate designer babies that will be stronger, smarter, or more immune to infections (Gene Therapy Creates Super-Muscles). Scientists could enhance height, athleticism and even intelligence. The possibilities are endless. Germline engineering, however, would alter every cell in the body. People would no longer have to worry about the alarming and intimidating combinations of their parents’ genes. Genetic engineers are able to eliminate unnatural genes, change existing ones or even add a few extra. Like it or not, in a few short years scientists will have the power to control the evolution of
Genetic modification may decrease the chances of genetic diseases, but how can we be sure we obtained and modified all the infected cells. If that would be where the line is drawn it would be a positive thing for everyone. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Once one starts messing with an embryo, then you began to wonder and curiosity gets the best of you. You begin to want to start changing eye color, way of thinking amongst a number of other stuff. Children don’t ask to be conceived and they sure as hell don’t ask to
In September 14, 1990, an operation, which is called gene therapy, was performed successfully at the National Institutes of Health in the United States. The operation was only a temporary success because many problems have emerged since then. Gene therapy is a remedy that introduces genes to target cells and replaces defective genes in order to cure the diseases which cannot be cured by traditional medicines. Although gene therapy gives someone who is born with a genetic disease or who suffers cancer a permanent chance of being cured, it is high-risk and sometimes unethical because the failure rate is extremely high and issues like how “good” and “bad” uses of gene therapy can be distinguished still haven’t been answered satisfactorily.
Imagine a parent walking into what looks like a conference room. A sheet of paper waits on a table with numerous questions many people wish they had control over. Options such as hair color, skin color, personality traits and other physical appearances are mapped out across the page. When the questions are filled out, a baby appears as he or she was described moments before. The baby is the picture of health, and looks perfect in every way. This scenario seems only to exist in a dream, however, the option to design a child has already become a reality in the near future. Parents may approach a similar scenario every day in the future as if choosing a child’s characteristics were a normal way of life. The use of genetic engineering should not give parents the choice to design their child because of the act of humans belittling and “playing” God, the ethics involved in interfering with human lives, and the dangers of manipulating human genes.
Finally, some opponents of germline genome editing argue that it should not be allowed in clinical practice because it is unnatural. However, this argument is predicated on the incorrect assumption that “natural” is synonymous with “good”. These opponents should consider that birth defects and other genetic diseases and disorders are also natural. If society advocated for a totally natural existence, the medical system would not exist. Medicine exists primarily for people’s desire to defy nature and live as long and as healthily as we possibly can. This opportunity should also be afforded to future people, especially now that there are more technologically advanced ways of accomplishing it.
Announced by scientists in, “Breakthroughs of the Year,” (qtd. By Cohen). 60,000 plus genetic combinations are at fault of diseases and roughly half are caused by the slightest error in the genetic code. Harvard University managed to use a genetic editing tool invented in 2012 to go the extra mile and instead of cutting into the DNA scientists are now able to substitute specifically the A,C,T, or G genes. The selected embryos are simply injected with the editing complexes in either the cytoplasm or other parts of nuclei and it is even farther to manipulate the actual gametes such as the egg or sperm. Unfortunately, the only issue in the science world is that scientists have not perfected their art, some of the issues include a group of cells staying their original form which were meant to be manipulated. The National Academies of Science and Medicine allow human gene editing strictly for the purpose of ridding the possibilities of genetic diseases in babies, its stated that anything else is forbidden because of the lack of perfection on the subject. Do not give up on the scientist yet because the benefits could be worth some of the evolutionary hiccups. In this article it was stated that a lecture was given by Dr. Maddy Young from a European cancer research institute with the purpose of informing the audience briefly over genetics
The editing of human embryos, also known as human germ line modification is the changing of the genetic makeup of embryos altering the DNA that would normally be passed from parent to offspring. The editing of human embryos is very dangerous and unethical in today’s world. Although the editing of embryos may seem to have some positive benefits, they are far outweighed by the negative side effects and the possible unknown side effects. This is a scientific innovation that has not been touched until recent times due to legal restrictions in most areas, but it is just begging to be explored in our modern day world, who knows what the outcome will be.
Human genetic engineering can provide humanity with the capability to construct “designer babies” as well as cure multiple hereditary diseases. This can be accomplished by changing a human’s genotype to produce a desired phenotype. The outcome could cure both birth defects and hereditary diseases such as cancer and AIDS. Human genetic engineering can also allow mankind to permanently remove a mutated gene through embryo screening as well as allow parents to choose the desired traits for their children. Negative outcomes of this technology may include the transmission of harmful diseases and the production of genetic mutations. The benefits of human genetic engineering outweigh the risks by providing mankind with cures to multiple deadly diseases.
Many debilitating and severe unwanted diseases, genetic disorders and disabilities can be avoided through the creation of designer babies. A child's quality of life would be drastically increased if they evade Down Syndrome, deformities or heart disease for example. In a sense, it isn’t all that different to hearing aid, medication for an illness or chemotherapy for cancer, but on a larger scale and earlier in someone’s life, before it even really begins in fact. Some people would argue that changing genes is changing who people are, which they view as ‘wrong’, but genes aren’t exactly the only things that make up a person anyway. The way that they grow up and their surroundings also make people...
Genes are made of DNA – the code of life (Gene Therapy- The Great Debate!). The changes in genes may cause serious problems, which we called genetic disorder. In theory, the only method to cure genetic disorders is gene therapy, which basically means the replacement of genes in order to correct the loss or change in people’s DNA. Although gene therapy gives patients with genetic disorders a permanent cure, it is controversial because it has safety and efficacy problems, and raises ethical issues.
In a recent study by Editas Medicine, they are working with CRISPR to prevent a blinding disorder called “leber congenital amarurosis” which is a rare inherited disease (Knapton, 2015). This disorder is due to a defect in a gene that encodes for a protein that is essential for vision, using CRISPR they are able to cut out the mutated areas. This is one example on how modifying DNA can be beneficial and why it should be accepted. Many inherited disorders like cystic fibrosis or Tay-Sachs. With parents having genetic screen tests they can provide a better future for their children and prevent them from a life with a
Scientists and the general population favor genetic engineering because of the effects it has for the future generation; the advanced technology has helped our society to freely perform any improvements. Genetic engineering is currently an effective yet dangerous way to make this statement tangible. Though it may sound easy and harmless to change one’s genetic code, the conflicts do not only involve the scientific possibilities but also the human morals and ethics. When the scientists first used mice to practice this experiment, they “improved learning and memory” but showed an “increased sensitivity to pain.” The experiment has proven that while the result are favorable, there is a low percentage of success rate. Therefore, scientists have concluded that the resources they currently own will not allow an approval from the society to continually code new genes. While coding a new set of genes for people may be a benefitting idea, some people oppose this idea.
...ring deadly diseases and preventing abortions. In order for gene therapy to one day become effective much more research needs to be done to discover the consequences of altering specific genes. Also the technology of gene therapy needs to be cost effective so people who need help are able to get help. In the end gene therapy in humans needs to come a long ways before it will be widely accepted but there is great potential in the technology and it needs to be pursued.