Why Did Stalin Tried To Act In Opposition To Capitalism

664 Words2 Pages

The authors say that revolutionary socialism was in opposition to capitalism. Explain in what ways the Soviets tried to act in opposition to capitalism. The efforts to build non-capitalist society had began in the countryside, where the majority of the population lived. Stalin wanted to combine the farms into larger units that would be run by regime loyalists. Established new collective farms Who were the kulaks and what happened to them? The kulaks were better off peasants and they rebelled. In response, Stalin wanted to liquidate the Kulaks because of their rebellion, so he got peasants to burn their crops, kill their livestock and destroy their farm machinery. What was collective agriculture and what was the result? Policy of abolishing private farms and replacing them with state …show more content…

Mussolini: Intimidation and fraud were Mussolini’s methods for coming to power. For example, he suppressed parties to join the fascist party. However, he also used peace to come to power as well. For example, he didn't use force when he marched to Rome in an effort to get the king to appoint him as Prime Minister. Hitler: Peace and legal might was used in Hitler's rise to power. Field Marshal Paul von Hindenburg appointed Hitler chancellor (prime minister) in January 1933. He pledged that the government would not be dominated by traditional conservatives. Thus, he came to power in a less radical manner. He did use intimidation and fraud too; ater being appointed he burned the Reichstag building in Berlin and blamed it on the Communists. What was the Enabling Act? Law that was passed on March 23, 1933, and it freed Hitler from the parliament. Essentially he could make laws without support of the parliament. What ideas and policies did the Nazis use to win popular support? They won popular support for restoring order and reviving the the German

Open Document