Ultra-Processed Foods In Human Health Rhetorical Analysis

911 Words2 Pages

Natural, earth grown foods are an essential part of every living being’s health. However, in the past century, people have begun to eat food made by man rather than from the earth. Recently, finding natural, organic, or raw foods has become more difficult than finding foods that have been processed in some way. Due to the bad eating habits that have become common in today’s society, people are living shorter, less fulfilled lives than people who eat healthy, well balanced diets. The article “Ultra-processed foods in human health: a critical appraisal” written by Michael J. Gibney, a nutrition scholar, explains how processed food consumption has increased dramatically, which in turn has caused an increase in chronic diseases and obesity rates. …show more content…

argument, CA Monteiro et als. article is entitled “Nutrition and health. The issue is not food, nor nutrients, so much as processing”, and argues for the importance of controlling the amount of processing allowed in foods. The main point Monteiro is trying to portray is the lack of knowledge people generally have on processing versus nutrition. He expresses this information by writing, “What is generally overlooked in such approaches, which currently dominate official and other authoritative information and education programmes, and also food and nutrition public health policies, is food processing,” expressing his complaints about the inadequacy in nutritional education systems (Monteiro et als., 729). The food pyramid is seen as a guide to healthy eating to many people. However, this pillar of health does not include processed foods in any categories, which allows for people to factor it in on their own. The absence of this determining factor can lead to people believing that foods such as prepackaged vegetables and raw vegetables have the same health advantages, whereas in reality the health benefits are significantly less in prepackaged …show more content…

Cogswell et al. in the article “Modeled changes in the US sodium intake from reducing sodium concentrations of commercially processed and prepared foods to meet voluntary standards established in North America: NHANES,”, with a focus on sodium overconsumption. Although there has been a limit to the amount of sodium used in foods, the guideline created by Dietary Guidelines for Americans was not very well enforced. Consuming more than the recommended amount of sodium in a day can lead to high blood pressure, which is a “major risk factor for heart disease and stroke, which are the first and fifth causes of death, respectively, in the United States” (Cogswell et al., 530). Cogswell chose to write this article to show how simple it could be to reduce the amount of sodium permitted in foods. The less sodium there is in foods, the less sodium people will consume overall, helping to lower the risks of obtaining diseases associated with sodium overconsumption such as diabetes. She writes, “Our analyses confirm NSRI predictions that an average twenty-five percent reduction in the sodium concentration of these foods would result in a twenty percent reduction in US intake,” which shows how little of a change would be necessary to reduce sodium intake and improve the overall health of the people in

Open Document