Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays On Uber
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Insuring Uber’s App-on Gap
Case Summary
In San Francisco, CA on December 31st, 2013 at approximately 8pm, a mother and her two young children were struck by an SUV while crossing the street at a busy intersection. They had waited for the “walk” signal before they stepped out into the street but the SUV took a right turn and struck the family. The mother and her 5 year old son were seriously hurt and the 6 year old daughter was killed. The SUV was driven by a man who worked for the ride sharing service called Uber.
Uber tried to remove liability by saying that the driver was not providing services for any passengers at the time of the accident. The lawyer for the family of the young girl argued that even though there were no services being
…show more content…
Taxi companies would like to close the App-On Gap because Uber would no longer have a competitive advantage over taxi companies who already have to carry commercial liability insurance. American Insurance Association, Uber customers the California App-Based Drivers Association and the attorneys for consumers would benefit from closing the App-On Gap because there would be a much lower risk of a company not paying for insurance than there is of a single individual not paying their insurance …show more content…
Economic because customers may choose what transportation service, if any, to use. Legal power because customers have a right to file a lawsuit against Uber if they so choose.
• Taxi companies, other ride sharing companies (Lyft) have political and legal power because they may lobby government for fair competition like supporting the App-On Gap law. Legal power because they can sue companies that compete unfairly.
• California App-Based Drivers Association, American Insurance Association, the public, attorneys for consumers, the Government, and internet based companies all have political power because they can network or work together in groups to lobby, present arguments for and publically support proposed legislation like the App-On Gap law. Governments can adopt laws and also dis allow commercial activity like banning Uber from cities and
“the exercise of that authority is curbed and shaped by the concern of government officials for its possible adverse effects of business, since adverse effects can cause unemployment and other consequences that government officials are unwilling to accept. In other areas of public policy, the authority of government is again curbed and shaped by concern for possible adverse effects of business” (Lindblom page 178).
Kay’s argument talks about the rideshare service “Uber” and how they are taking over the taxi industry. Weaknesses found in Kay’s article is when he makes Uber look bad when talking about their flashy and innovative app, which seems like he is promoting it and with a little more research, Kay can find other apps that are similar to Uber. He sounds tongue-in-cheek when writing it. Secondly, Kay is lacking evidence to support what he is trying to say in his article because his points are too weak and basic. Finally, this article left the reader wondering what is he really trying to prove in his argument about Uber since he seems to be all over the place with his arguments. Overall, this article was very weak and not
The ability for the federal government to regulate businesses’ activity is given in the Constitution. Article 1, Section 8 is known as the commerce clause; it states, “Congress shall have the Power…to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes” (Reed, 173). Through the commerce clause, the government is able to regulate business activity by the use of administrative agencies, which is defined as “a governmental regulatory body that controls and supervises a particular activity or area of public interest and administers and enforces a particular body of law related to that activity or interest” (Administrative Agency, 1). There are two types of regulatory authority that agencies may possess; quasi-legislative and/or quasi-judicial. Quasi-legislative means that agencies can make rules and regulations that have the same impact as a law created by federal legislation. Quasi-judicial authority gives agencies the power to make rulings, just like in federal courts.
How did Uber and Lyft become more popular in 2016-2017? Because people love the latest and greatest trends once popular. As a result, many of us, especially young people, are unaware of the many reasonable safety standards that these companies are not required to follow, like in-depth background checks, vehicle safety and valid insurance policies. According to an article in Forbes Magazine titled, “Uber's Background Checks Failed to Catch a Murderer and Other Felons, Prosecutors Say”, prosecutors from San Francisco and Los Angeles contends that ridesharing companies like Uber and Lyft continue to mislead their customers by selling the notion that the company conduct in-depth background checks on all of their drivers. Despite the fact records show that drivers are intentionally providing false personal information to these companies, hiding incidents of sexual assault, assault, pedophilia, robbery, theft, kidnapping and murder. Recently, both Uber and Lyft settle lawsuits, requiring them to change the wording in their message to customers. Prosecutors maintained that the “gold standard” for criminal background check must include fingerprinting or other biometric identifier; therefore, Uber and Lyft cannot claim “industry-leading”
In an article that appeared on CNBC.com, “According to the 2014 Census data, there are more than 4.4 million Americans aged 16 and over working as drivers, and the vast majority of those are men are categorized as "driver/sales workers and truck drivers" (Fahey). Uber is a company that has many drivers working for them out of the 4.4 million and it is at stake if driverless cars are going to play a part of the future. "’The reason Uber could be expensive is because you're not just paying for the car — you're paying for the other dude in the car," says Uber CEO Travis Kalanick’” (Fahey). If you were to take the Uber driver out of the picture since the car is driverless, the cost of the ride would go down because you would only have to pay for yourself and not the one driving you as well. This change would cause Uber to lose half of their income due to receiving half of what they would usually make before driverless vehicles were in the picture. Another negative outcome of driverless cars is that some police officers may be laid off because there’s no need for a lot of them if these cars won’t be speeding or drunk driving. But fortunately, there will be fewer
industries strive for. Government regulations are meant to help more than just the one entity; the
The suit alleges that the rental car company should be liable for the woman’s death because they “either knew
General Motors Company attaches importance to add value for customers. They important partnerships are Lyft and Maven, which are leading the way with ride sharing and car sharing. Summarize Mary Barra’s words, I knew General Motors Company focusing on safety, convenient and technology. They changing the way people get from point A to point B. Mary Barra told General Motors will corporate with IBM to create OnStar Go which use IBM Watson. This is the car industry’s first cognitive mobility platform. In early 2017, the platform provides personalized content through the dashboard, such as you can pay for
There are a lot of positive reports about the benefits working for Uber has compared to working for a taxi company. Cab drivers have to pay exponential rates to lease cabs; Uber drivers have the freedom to drive cars they own. Many former cab drivers have switched to Uber due to the personal financial benefits (“Uber isn’t Just Good For…”). There have been some reports of inappropriate
With regards to the power of customers within both industries, the forces are rather high as the consumer drives the business growth within each sector. Additionally, with various alternative methods of commuting available to the consumers, there is an extreme need to develop solutions that appeal and add more value to customers. For Barriers to Entry, each industry is completely different causing the overall threat to be considered medium. The transportation industry is very well established and new methods along with additional tracks and routes are not physically possible within the Chicagoland area. For the Smartphone APP industry, the force threat is extremely low as hundreds of new applications are released weekly along with the ability for new applications to be
It is a part of the American culture, angry people on their way to work all in a hurry in rage that someone cut them off. While traffic is a well known irritating aspect of everyday transportation, Uber claims that they have not added more traffic. They claim that their data proves they do not add to the congestion in cities but, “transportation analyst Charles Komanoff has crunched Uber’s own numbers and estimates that the service has actually reduced traffic speeds in the central business district by about 8 percent”(3). Eight percent, that does not seem like a lot but remember this is still a new business and it is only growing larger everyday. Uber is adding to the everyday problem people deal with on their way to work.
Uber needs to focus its entry into densely populated areas of Canada lacking a well developed public transit system. These opportunities can easily be taken advantage of if Uber was to further develop its existing strengths.
With the introduction of the modern ride-sharing app Uber, the ethical issue of whether the initiative should be used in favour of the more traditional taxi has been subjected to debate. Wendy Squires wrote an article in the ‘Sydney Morning Herald’ on the 30th of May 2015 titled “Why I hail Uber and damn Taxis”. Her contention was that the Taxi industry is a ‘disgrace’ and terribly outdated, and wrote in an informal, yet very attacking tone. In contrast to Squires article, a reader named Andrew posted a comment on ‘The Age Online’ on the 10th of September 2015, contesting that he too is a supporter of Uber, yet he wrote in a much more logical and reasonable tone. ‘The Courier’ cartoonist H. Payne also shared their viewpoint on the issue, with
When the government tries to regulate business it can cause an economic downfall because there is no longer a demand from the consumers. Overall, the government intervening with competition will always cause more harm than
Also, people should have the right to the “pursuit of happiness” in terms of economic success through competitive private markets to a certain extent. Government should step in when companies are monopolizing or when there are not enough supplies for a certain good or service. The most common example is liquor stores. Privately owned liquor stores are usually preferred as the products are cheaper for customers and more profitable for business owners. In this situation, the free-market mentality interferes with federal regulation, so the government should interfere in order to benefit