Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Shriberg and Shriberg 2011 Pros and cons of transformational leadership
Shriberg and Shriberg 2011 Pros and cons of transformational leadership
Essays on transformational leadership behaviours
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
James MacGregor Burns has defined leadership as “leaders inducing the followers to act for certain goals that represent the values and the motivations – the wants and needs, the aspirations and expectations – of both leaders and followers” (Burns 1978. p.19.)
The concept of leadership as a whole encompasses different explanations, theories and leadership styles and has been popular not only from the organizational perspective but in the educational and political context as well. This essay aims to address the key concepts of Transformational leadership which belongs to the more recent approach taken towards leadership.
From around the mid-19th century, social scientists have been engaged in understanding and developing the nature of leadership in social evolution. This has led to the development of various theories and approaches to leadership. The early approach to leadership began with the Great man theories and has gradually led to the formation of the ‘New Leadership Approach’ (Bryman 1992) which included ‘visionary’ (Sashkin 1998) , ‘charismatic’ (Conger 1989; Conger and Kanungo,1988; House 1977) or ‘Transformational models’ (Bass 1985; Tichy & Devanna,1986). While the early approaches to leadership focused on the traits of the leader the subsequent approaches gave more importance to additional variables such as skill level and the situational factors ( google- dads link)
Review of Literature
Max Weber’s (1947) approach to leadership was based on charisma and it was based on his approach that James MacGregor Burns proposed the theory of Transformational Leadership.
In his book titled Leadership (1978), Bur...
... middle of paper ...
...t of the early research on Transformational leadership Theory originated from studies that were conducted in the United States. Therefore there was a need to develop a UK version in order to address some of the problems of generalizability and to most importantly, determine whether the dimensions of Transformational Leadership that have emerged in the North American studies were similar to those found in the UK. (Alimo- Metcalfe & Alban –Metcalfe, 2001)
What must be taken into account is the fact that Leadership as a part of the “New Paradigm Model’ has been viewed as a process of “Social Influence” (Bass 1998a, b; Bryman 1992).
The main objective in developing and designing a UK instrument was to create one that is of practical value to managers at all levels (Alban-Metcalfe & Alimo-Metcalfe,2000)
(MENTION 14 DIMENSIONS)
Leadership is a topic of great importance not only in military or organisational settings but all most in all settings which involves people. It’s a universal activity evident in humankind (Bass,1990). It is a wide and diverse field of knowledge. Leaders are individuals who help their followers or subordinates to carry out a particular task in an efficient and an effective manner. Researches on the topic of leaders and leadership have been taking place for past many decades. One of the more recent styles of leadership which has been considered to be very effective is the transformational leadership. It’s a concept explained by James McGregor Burns in 1978 who was influenced by the work of German sociologist Max Weber. The concept was then further refined and developed by Bernard.M.Bass. The whole concept of transformational leadership talks about how leaders can transform their followers into doing a task better than what is expected from them and how it can help in the betterment of the organisation and the followers. The purpose...
Transformational leadership can be defined as causing a change in individual and social system. Besides, transformational leaders usually connect follower’s aspirational with the organizational goal and persuade the followers to achieve the organizational goals to satisfy themselves (Tauber, 2012).
A definition of leadership by Mumford is “the influence of others towards a collective goal” (Mumford, 2010). Some other definitions of leadership include; leadership is a force that leaders posses that causes followers to act and head in the intended direction of the leader (Hogue, 2013). Another definition by Gary Yukl is leadership is influencing others to understand what need to be done and how to go about getting it done (Yukl, 2006). Leadership requires the inevitable use of power to influence the thought and also the actions of other people. (Zalezink, 1977).
Bass B. M., Avolio B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
To be successful in business will require much more than just dedication and creativity, you’ll also need the right product and service in order to meet the demand customers are looking for in the completive market. Your organization needs to be able to adapt and willing to change to achieve the needs and wants of market. This will only happen if you and the people around you are good leaders. In the book “Leadership Transformed” it offers some of the basic fundamental strategy and framework using metaphors to describe steps of leadership transformation and the path to become exordanary leader in the 21 first century. This book helps shaping leadership by providing evidence, research data and experience for young upcoming leaders. This is a great book for people who are looking to improve their leadership skill, and improve the outcome of their business venture.
Bass, 1990, explains that the word ‘‘leadership’’ was initially used to explain political influence and control of the British Parliament in the 1800s. He further elaborates that leadership was based on heritage and appointment and used to take place often in Anglo-Saxon countries (Bass, 1990, p. 11). Katz and Kahn, 1966, p.334 expands that leadership is to acknowledge the skill to influence others on organisational relevance. Michener et al. (1990) described leadership ‘‘as a process that takes place in groups in which one member influences and controls the behaviour of the other members towards some common goal’’ (cited in Denmark, 1993, p. 343), signifying that the control of employees was a required aspect of effective leadership. The assumption therefore is that if someone is to lead, he should extend beyond influence. This comprises motivation and helping others to accomplish the goals of the organisation.
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.
Carson Dye describes leadership as “a living phenomenon”; and that “it is expected to shift shape according to its purpose and the demands of its followers and the environment. It is as a social influence process in which the leader seeks the voluntary participation of subordinates in an effort to reach organizational goals”. (Dye, 2010) According to Dye, Leadership is both
According to Yoder-Wise (2015), a leader can be defined as, “an individual who works with others to develop a clear vision of the preferred future and to make that vision happen” (p 35). As employees, we often have our own ideal of a good leader, which may be influenced by experiences and perception of workplace norms. While one’s opinion of an effective leader may vary, there are several recognized leadership theories. The following will focus on the transformational leadership approach.
Certainly, an army would not be able to battle in the war without a commander who in charges of the whole strategy. Correspondingly, any organisations cannot function without leaders. Leader is the most substantial element of successful organizations. Becoming outstanding leaders, leadership skill is vital in order to drive the organizations forward. Several leadership principles are extensively used these days. Burns (1978) identified two types of leadership comprise of transactional and transformational leadership. Hence, leaders should be capable to indicate which theory should be applied in accordance with organization’s culture and objectives. This essay aims to evaluate the resemblances and the differences between transactional and transformational leadership as well as the feasibility to utilize a mixture of them by giving the definitions and examples followed by the supporting researches and studies.
A brief description of transformational leadership, according to James MacGregor Burns, is a new paradigm
Leadership is defined as a process by which an individual influences others to obtain goals. There are three aspects that should be addressed when explaining leadership. One aspect is that leadership is a social influence process; leadership could not exist without a leader and one or more followers. Another leadership aspect is compliance; all of the leader’s directions must be complied with voluntarily. Compliance is what separates leadership from other influence-based formal authority.
“Leadership might be interpreted in simple term, such as getting others to follow or getting people to do things willingly or interpreted more specifically” (J.Mullins, 2007).
Northouse (2001) recognizes the underlying strengths and weaknesses of the theory of transformational leadership as strengths and weaknesses are inevitable dimensions of any leadership premise. Strengths of Transformational Leadership include widely researched with instances of eminent leaders, successfully impacting followers at different levels ranging from one-on-one level to the entire institution and robustly accentuating requirements and values of the associated people. Weaknesses of Transformational Leadership encompasses issues like containing extremely wide-ranging contents, considering the concept of leadership more as a character attribute than as a taught act and most importantly possessing the risks of power misuse. Prior researches
Transformational leadership focuses on what the leader can accomplish instead of his personal characteristics and how his relationship with others. This leader “helps to bring about major, positive changes by moving group members beyond their self-interests and toward the good of the group, organization, or society (Dubrin, 2007, p. 84). The essence of this leader is to develop and transform people.