The Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes

1096 Words3 Pages

Money Hurts College athletes attend post-secondary schools in order to receive an education and to participate in sports. “Student athletes participate in an organized competitive sport sponsored by the educational institution in which he or she is enrolled. Student athletes must typically balance the roles of being a full-time student and a full-time athlete” (“Student athlete” 1). Additionally, some people believe athletes should receive a salary. However, paying college athletes hurts the school, the sports, and the athletes.
Paying college athletes can create financial problems for many schools. Most athletes get a full ride scholarship to play the sport they love, but colleges are having trouble with money because the schools offer more financial
Thus, after admitting a student, they are committing to meeting all of
Even though college athletes feel the need to be paid, they do not realize what problems they are creating for the schools. If schools cannot pay athletes, it looks bad on the program and they will lose out on other talented players who want to attend and play for that school (King 1). The reputation of the school is on the line. Paying for talent reduces the sport to a job instead of a skillful game. Not only can the school have problems, but also the sport. “College coaches are usually unpaid as well” (Furth 1). Therefore, it would not be reasonable to pay athletes and leave coaches with no currency. Furthermore, if athletes were to get a salary, university departments will be prosecuted and charged (Furth 1). On the other hand, even though athletes want to receive pay: it can create lawsuits by breaking the NCAA pay cap (Furth 2). If paying athletes can lead to serious complications like so, there probably will be no activity programs. In other words, if any sport programs are no further at those colleges, coaches could lose their jobs and maybe athletes could lose their chance to going pro or possibly lose their

Open Document