The Argument Of The Role Of Critical Race Theory In Higher Education

What is the main argument of the article the Role of Critical Race Theory in Higher Education ?

The institution of higher education causes different forms of social inequities through its climate, curriculum, the division between student affairs and academic affairs, and so on. And the five tenets of CRT can be used to criticize the inequity and contribute the inclusivity and diversity in higher education.

What key pieces of evidence does the author Hiradlo use to support her argument?

I think the "key" evidence is the ideas from outside authors such as Ladson-Billings, DeCuir, Dixson, Delgado Bernal, Villlalpando, and so on. It is because the author Hiraldo constantly uses many other authors ' ideas to combine her own ideas for supporting

The main argument is that the race as factor in inequity and the intersection of race and property cause the inequity happening and developing in U.S society, especially in American education. Also, U.S society is based on property rights instead of human

Besides, the genetic determinist and cultural deficit models cause and maintain the low educational attainment of minority student.

What key pieces of evidence does the author G.Solorzano use to support his argument?

I think the "key" evidence is the G. Allport 's racial stereotypes list (1979). In the list, it shows that what people think or stereotype about the Blacks, Chicanas, and Native Americans. By interpreting the list, we can understand why teachers have certain attitudes and behaviors toward the students of color. For instance, the Chicanas are framed as "dumb" and "lazy", therefore, teachers have low expectations and less motivation to teach them. As a result, different students are treated differently in school.

Consider how each author’s arguments build/support each other and/or disagree with each