Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tattoos in the workplace laws
Tattoos in the workplace why they should be accepted
Tattoos and Piercings in the workplace, essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tattoos in the workplace laws
After reading and evaluating the article, Tattoos and Piercings in the Workplace by Erika Icon I am able to stand on my view on the frequently asked question, should tattoos and piercings be covered up in the workplace? Yes, they should be covered. Although I am all for “self expression” I believe the workers of a company represent the overall appeal of the business and unless they are a tattoo company, showing your neck tattoo may give off the wrong impression to valued customers. The current mainstream culture and younger generation see no problem with the art of tattoos, but this does not include older men and women. Some people have a negative connotation towards tattoos and piercings and may affect their support of a business. It is up to the workplace to consider this when hiring. If I were an owner of a company visible tattoos would be a huge downside when looking for possible employees. I would have to consider if their experience and other resume attributions made up for their body art. Overall, at the end of the day I would rather choose a worker with no tattoos than one with them …show more content…
Some people have consulted laser tattoo removal. This profession of laser tattoo removal found in dermatologist and cosmetic surgery facilities has grown in popularity over the years with the increase of tattoos. On the flip side, careers in the art field have no issues with hiring tatted workers. The author added their own excerpt at the end of the article expressing her opinion on the whole debate. It gave an interesting perspective from a person with actual tattoos in the work force. Despite having the opportunity to “be herself” she still abided by the rules. I think this was very professional and considerate. At the end of the day you are the one who needs the job and it is best to follow the rules to avoid any dilemmas that may cost you your
A controversial topic today is whether or not body piercings and tattoos should be accepted by professionals working in health care. Currently, tattoos and piercings are allowed in health care as long as they are not visible. According to one of the studies, “Body piercing is defined as a piercing of the body anywhere other than the earlobes” (Westerfield). Therefore, the only visible piercings allowed are small studs in the lobes of the ears for females. The reason body piercings and tattoos are not suggested in health care is that they keep someone from looking professional as well as making them look intimidating. Not everyone sees them that way. The opposing side is that they do not affect
In “Judging by the Cover” author Bonnie Gainley argues that employers have the right to discriminate against job applicants who have chosen to decorate their bodies in ways that, in the employers’ estimation, may detract from the applicants’ job performance. She supports this claim by explaining two major points: First, employers have an obligation to hire workers who will favorably “represent the business to its customers” (667), and second, job applicants with potentially offensive decorations, such as tattoos and piercings, have freely chosen to place them on their bodies, so the applicants must take responsibility for the consequences.
Even though tattoos are becoming part of culture and socially acceptable, the negative and prejudiced attitudes towards those with body art are still present. Not all tattoos are gang related, and one must note that they have historically been a symbol of someone’s culture or religion. Other tattoos may have just a personal meaning to its owner and was not intended to be offensive. People also do not understand that a tattoo may impede them from pursuing a professional career, regardless of their qualifications. Employers realize that the need to recruit workers from different backgrounds are important in such a competitive workforce, so they provide accommodation by having reasonable dress code policies.
Just because someone has most of their body covered in tattoos and many piercings, that does not mean that they are not a wonderful person and it is not great at their job. On a personal account, I have met many great people covered in wonderful tattoos and are the nicest people in the world. But, I can understand why jobs will look at a person, and understand why they will not hire them for a job based on body modifications and tattoos that they have. Yes, when getting a job, they must look presentable and when working you can cover the tattoos with shirts and makeup. You should still be able to get the job based on how you work, if you are good for that job, not on how you look.
“According to 2010 survey Millennials are the most tattooed generation followed by Generation X” (Negley 1). As Generation X takes over leading roles in our work places, they are allowing new ideas, and different views of social norms to take place. Implementing new social norms for tattoos and piercings will allow the following generations to have the freedom to express themselves freely without being held down by conditions of their employment. “Research reported that in 2009 our nation showed a prevalence rating of 35% for people between the ages of twenties and thirties” (Williams, Thomas, and Christensen 1). This alone shows that our society is changing, and becoming more accepting towards people that receive body modifications. Our country has begun to rethink common standards of professional appearances, specifically to respect the employees that may have tattoos that are
The world has changed tremendously throughout the years. Through the personal and cultural expression of tattooing oneself most wonder why people today get tattoos. Furthermore, those who think tattoos are just for looks will have to realize that tattoos are a part of ones life. Therefore one might say, “ Tattooing is used in a way to mark important events or people in their lives in a permanent way.”(Milcetich) people today should look in the meaning and value of a tattoo “As a statement carved in ones body” (Milcetich). Along with that meaning in ones body, people’s attitudes towards tattoos have begun to change what one thinks about tattoos.
Furthermore, I believe that an individual may have a tattoo, no matter what field of work they are doing and this is because that
Have you ever seen a banker or doctor with tattoos or piercings? Chances are you probably haven’t because people think that these body modifications are unprofessional and not meant to be in the work place. Even though it might not look like what you usually think of when you think of a professional, nevertheless, people should be able to have them because it’s a form of freedom of expression. It can also help people feel better about themselves and feel unique in the sense that most people won’t have the same exact tattoos.
In the labor market, for example, employers have expectations of conduct, maturity and discipline from their employees. Given that tattoos are still, generally, connoted with rebellion and youth, some employees may regard them as an undesirable trait because they can be interpreted as a sign of immaturity. In fact, surveys have shown that up to 31% of employers say that visible tattoos is the top attribute for rejection of a candidate. This has been specially relevant in recent times of higher unemployment as a result of the
They should change the rules of having to cover them up. There shouldn’t be discrimination to a person with them and them having a lower percentage of getting a job because they have visible tattoos. The workplace should make the dress code policy less strict and should allow for people with tattoos to have the same changes of getting the job as much as everyone else. Also on stapaw.com they list off 10 reasons why tattoos and piercings should be covered in the workplace. Four of those reasons related directly to this essay explaining the workplace’s reasons why they believe tattoos shouldn’t be allowed in the workplace.
With an increase of people supporting tattoos it is fair to say that there will be a staggering increase of people entering the workforce with visible tattoos. This is applicable to most all fields of employment which differs from the
What impression would the employer get if someone came in for an interview with piercings and tattoos? The employer would think that this person really doesn't want the job because he/she doesn't care about their appearance. Unfortunately, people are very stereotypical and do judge a book by its cover. The business world is very conservative, and that's how you should look. It would be extremely uncommon to see people with tattoos all over and piercings everywhere.
Tattoos have been around for over 5,000 years they are not something new, yet society still treats them like they are. Their new found popularity should be celebrated amongst everyone. You do not have to get a tattoo to be accepting of the fact that others have them. If tattoos were more openly accepted by society, there would be less of a social divide amongst each other. Tattoos are just another medium of art, we are told to embrace art and to evolve as human beings. Part of that process is to accept all forms of art without excluding one, just because you think it might be
People with tattoos and piercings are classified as uneducated, less qualified, lazy, irresponsible, and even defined as delinquents. This is simply prejudice and biased. There are so many employees today, including doctors, lawyers, teachers, and even businessmen, who have tattoos and/or piercings, and are qualified to successfully complete the tasks they are given on a daily basis. Whether these people had tattoos or not, each individual would have the same educations and same work ethic. If someone who had tattoos and/or piercings was serving a customer, and this customer knew the employee had tattoos, the service would be no different if the customer did not know. This clearly shows that having tattoos and modifications in the workplace is not a negative thing. However, in Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi’s article they state that Dr. Elzweig advises, “Employees need to use discretion in the workplace. In addition, employers need to recognize that the paradigm is shifting and that body modifications are becoming more mainstream” (Texas A&M University-Corpus
There’s also been appearance discrimination on Individuals that like self-expression and therefore tattoo their bodies. As David Kirby states, in “Inked Well”, “[I]n addition to being nasty and unsanitary, tattoos only grace the skins of either bottom feeders or those who pretend they are” (693). To make a statement so profound based off an individual having tattoos is abhorrent and absurd. A tattoo does not define a person as being a criminal or bottom feeder. As Kirby later realized, “Tattoos have always been a means of identifying oneself, notes Ms.DeMello, and are always meant to be read”( 695). Tattoos are a way of self-expression, a way of art and are also spiritual and meaningful to the individuals with them. As Kirby interviewed a couple individuals he came across a woman named Jodie, “ Jodie was the sweetest, the most articulate, and the most heavily inked…Jodie explained that she had been a “cutter” who “was having a lot of trouble with hurting myself physically for various reasons, so I began to get tattoos”(694). Tattoos can have a positive meaning behind them. Jodie’s comment shows that people with tattoos are not criminals or bottom feeder but articulate individuals. Therefore, it’s not valid to discriminate on an individual that had a choice to be