Summary Of Synopses By Jorge Frascara

434 Words1 Page

Synopses: Reading 1 At the beginning of this article, Jorge Frascara disagrees with how EI Lissitzky relate graphic design to fine arts without considering its social impact. Some artist viewed it as an art form while he stands at the opposite side. He points out the flaws of Lissitzky’s failure to recognize graphic design from several aspects. For example, he ignores the problems of appropriateness, performance and the impact on the public and in the visual environment. Lissitzky and some contemporary avant-garde artists did not clearly distinguish the difference between visual creation and visual manipulation. This results in negative influence in mass communication. Jorge used the example of Pelikan ink to illustrate how inappropriate it is to overemphasize visual structure during the graphic design process. The image created …show more content…

He argues that graphic design can never be fully interpreted only with esthetic analysis. The technology, Efficiency of communication, and its social responsibility should also be taken into account. From Jorge’s perspective, a successful graphic designer is someone who build a communication link between the design and its audience while creating a pattern. It is important that the clients’ needs must be meet, but the author does not support the idea that schools should directly serve industry. He suggests a balance between esthetic construction of pattern as well as a clear implication that can be easily understood by viewers. Jorge talks about the quality of graphic design, which is how the design can be measured. He stated that clarity and beauty do not determine its overall achievement. The evaluation of the communication design process need to focus on the behavioral changes it produces in the target population, that is, to consider it social significance. Jorge’s answer to question in the topic should therefore be both fine art and social

Open Document